Question

Understanding risks that affect projects and the impact of risk consideration Yatta Net International has manufacturing,...

Understanding risks that affect projects and the impact of risk consideration

Yatta Net International has manufacturing, distribution, retail, and consulting divisions. Projects undertaken by the manufacturing and distribution divisions tend to be low-risk projects, because these divisions are well established and have predictable demand. The company started its retail and consulting divisions within the last year, and it is unknown if these divisions will be profitable. The company knew that opening these new divisions would be risky, but its management believes the divisions have the potential to be extremely profitable under favorable market conditions. The company is currently using its WACC to evaluate new projects for all divisions.

If Yatta Net International does not risk-adjust its discount rate for specific projects properly, which of the following is likely to occur over time?

Check all that apply.

The firm will accept too many relatively risky projects.

The firm will become less valuable.

The firm will accept too many relatively safe projects.

Generally, a positive correlation exists between a project’s returns and the returns on the firm’s other assets. If this correlation is   , stand-alone risk will be a good proxy for within-firm risk.

Consider the case of another company. Kim Printing is evaluating two mutually exclusive projects. They both require a $1 million investment today and have expected NPVs of $200,000. Management conducted a full risk analysis of these two projects, and the results are shown below.

Risk Measure

Project A

Project B

Standard deviation of project’s expected NPVs $80,000 $120,000
Project beta 1.2 1.0
Correlation coefficient of project cash flows (relative to the firm’s existing projects) 0.7 0.5

Which of the following statements about these projects’ risk is correct? Check all that apply.

Project A has more stand-alone risk than Project B.

Project B has more stand-alone risk than Project A.

Project B has more market risk than Project A.

Project A has more corporate risk than Project B.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

1. Check all that apply.

The firm will accept too many relatively risky projects.

The firm will become less valuable.

2.

Generally, a positive correlation exists between a project’s returns and the returns on the firm’s other assets. If this correlation is High , stand-alone risk will be a good proxy for within-firm risk.

3.

Which of the following statements about these projects’ risk is correct? Check all that apply.

Project B has more stand-alone risk than Project A.

Project A has more corporate risk than Project B.

Please upvote

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Yatta Net International has manufacturing, distribution, retail, and consulting divisions. Projects undertaken by the manufacturing and...
Yatta Net International has manufacturing, distribution, retail, and consulting divisions. Projects undertaken by the manufacturing and distribution divisions tend to be low-risk projects, because these divisions are well established and have predictable demand. The company started its retail and consulting divisions within the last year, and it is unknown if these divisions will be profitable. The company knew that opening these new divisions would be risky, but its management believes the divisions have the potential to be extremely profitable under...
Cranberry Corp. has two divisions of equal size: a computer manufacturing division and a data processing...
Cranberry Corp. has two divisions of equal size: a computer manufacturing division and a data processing division. Its CFO believes that stand-alone data processor companies typically have a WACC of 8%, while stand-alone computer manufacturers typically have a 12% WACC. He also believes that the data processing and manufacturing divisions have the same risk as their typical peers. Consequently, he estimates that the composite, or corporate, WACC is 10%. A consultant has suggested using an 8% hurdle rate for the...
Abrosz Inc. is considering two projects, A and B. In assessing the projects’ risks, the company...
Abrosz Inc. is considering two projects, A and B. In assessing the projects’ risks, the company estimated the beta of each project versus both the company’s other assets and the stock market, and it also conducted thorough scenario and simulation analyses. This research produced the following data: Project A Project B Expected NPV $6,000 $6,000 Standard deviation (σNPV) $1500 $1200 Project beta (vs. market) 0.8 0.9 Correlation of the project cash flows with cash flows from currently existing projects. Cash...
A company has two separate projects A and B. Project A has less risk than Project...
A company has two separate projects A and B. Project A has less risk than Project B and company requires WACC plus 0.5 percent return for Project A. Project B has more risk and the firm asks its WACC plus 1 percent return. The company has a debt-equity ratio of .45. The company’s cost of equity is 14.7 percent and the after-tax cost of debt is 5.1 percent. If you expect 11.64 percent rate of return from project A and...
Suppose William Inc. uses a WACC of 9% for below-average risk projects, 11% for average-risk projects,...
Suppose William Inc. uses a WACC of 9% for below-average risk projects, 11% for average-risk projects, and 13% for above-average risk projects. Which of the following independent projects should William accept, assuming that the company uses the NPV method when choosing projects? Project A, which has average risk and an IRR = 12%. Project B, which has below-average risk and an IRR = 9.5%. Project C, which has above-average risk and an IRR = 13.5%. Without information about the projects'...
Puckett Inc. risk-adjusts its WACC to account for project risk. It uses a risk-adjusted project cost...
Puckett Inc. risk-adjusts its WACC to account for project risk. It uses a risk-adjusted project cost of capital of 8% for below-average risk projects, 10% for average-risk projects, and 12% for above-average risk projects. Which of the following independent projects should Puckett accept, assuming that the company uses the NPV method when choosing projects? a. Project C, which has above-average risk and an IRR = 11%. b. Without information about the projects' NPVs we cannot determine which project(s) should be...
When projects involve certain, or constant, cash flows, the capital budgeting analysis that can be conducted...
When projects involve certain, or constant, cash flows, the capital budgeting analysis that can be conducted is very simple and straightforward. Unfortunately, this type of project rarely exists. When a project’s cash flows, or the conditions that affect their magnitude or timing, vary from their expected values, then the analysis becomes more complicated. Projects that have the potential to exhibit greater or lesser levels of risk than the firm’s average, or normal, level means that adjustments should be made to...
Capital Structure, WACC, and Firm Investment Suppose a firm can borrow money to finance projects from...
Capital Structure, WACC, and Firm Investment Suppose a firm can borrow money to finance projects from a bank at a marginal, pre- tax rate of 4.0%. Suppose the firm’s stock currently has a beta of 1.2, the market risk premium is 6% and the risk-free rate is 4.0%. The firm is currently financed with 40% debt and faces a 30% marginal tax rate. The firm is considering an average-risk project with the following free cash flows: Year 0 1 2...
1. Net present value (NPV) Evaluating cash flows with the NPV method The net present value...
1. Net present value (NPV) Evaluating cash flows with the NPV method The net present value (NPV) rule is considered one of the most common and preferred criteria that generally lead to good investment decisions. Consider this case: Suppose Happy Dog Soap Company is evaluating a proposed capital budgeting project (project Alpha) that will require an initial investment of $400,000. The project is expected to generate the following net cash flows: Year Cash Flow Year 1 $375,000 Year 2 $400,000...
Net present value (NPV) Evaluating cash flows with the NPV method The net present value (NPV)...
Net present value (NPV) Evaluating cash flows with the NPV method The net present value (NPV) rule is considered one of the most common and preferred criteria that generally lead to good investment decisions. Consider this case: Suppose Happy Dog Soap Company is evaluating a proposed capital budgeting project (project Alpha) that will require an initial investment of $450,000. The project is expected to generate the following net cash flows: Year Cash Flow Year 1 $300,000 Year 2 $475,000 Year...