Stevie Wonder was hired to record for XYX Recording Company. Stevie and the producer for XYZ had a difference in opinion and Stevie refused to record with XYZ. Stevie decided that he would record his song with Blue Label Recording Company. XYZ sued Stevie and requested that the court enjoin him from recording with Blue Label. Using IRAC what would be the outcome.
I have answered the question below
Please up vote for the same and thanks!!!
Do reach out in the comments for any queries
Answer:
The fact that an artist (Stevie Wonder) had a difference of opinion with the producer does not void the contract terms and conditions with the recording company.
There has to be a negotiation between the recording company and the artist to set the terms if there has to be termination of the contract with the artist. Unless and until there is an explicit condition in the contract mentioning that the artist not approving results in the termination of the contract, the terms are still in effect. The artist is owed to the recording company the mentioned amount in the contract for the songs and albums.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.