Yusuf is considering installing a new energy-efficient lighting in his firm’s warehouse. The installation will cost $300,000, and he estimates total savings of $75,000 per year. The lights will depreciate evenly over five years, at which point they must be replaced. The cost of capital is 7% per year. What do the NPV and EVA rules indicate about whether Yusuf should install the lights?
NPV of the installation |
Intial Cost+PV of savings for 5 yrs.at 7% Cost of capital |
ie. -300000+(75000*4.10020) (P/A,i=7%,n=5) |
7515 |
As NPV is POSITIVE, it will add value to the firm . |
Hence installation is recommended. |
Economic Value Added approach: |
EVA per year =Economic benefits ,ie.net of depreciation -(initial investment*Cost of capital) |
ie. (75000-(300000/5))-(300000*7%)= |
-6000 |
As per EVA approach, installation does not add value |
& hence not recommended |
The difference is due to the depreciation charge in EVA method |
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.