Question

Principles laid down in law in the case of Salmon Vs Salmon and Co Ltd 1897....

Principles laid down in law in the case of Salmon Vs Salmon and Co Ltd 1897. AC 22

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Principles laid down in law in the case of salmon vs salmon and Co 1897 are as follows

1) It recognised the separate legal entity of the company distinct from that of the shareholders

2) It recognised the limited liability of members

3) It recognised that members can give loan to compmay

4) It recognised that a secured creditor(over assets), even he is a member ordirector of the company, will have preference over unsecured creditors

5) It lifted the corporate veil of the company

6)Any rights, obligations or liabilities of a company are discrete from those of its shareholders

7) The shareholders cannot be called to pay the debts of the company

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
State the legal principle on company law established by the case of Salomon vs Salomon &...
State the legal principle on company law established by the case of Salomon vs Salomon & Co. Ltd. (1897) A 22
What is the law which has been decided in the case of Associated Metal Smelters Ltd...
What is the law which has been decided in the case of Associated Metal Smelters Ltd vs Tham Cheow Toh (1971) 1 MLJ 271?
Salmon Co manufactured custom-made fishing boats that were guaranteed to withstand the harsh open seas. They...
Salmon Co manufactured custom-made fishing boats that were guaranteed to withstand the harsh open seas. They manufactured only 1 boat at a time, and each boat took 18 months each to build. An 18-month contract with one of Salmon Co’s clients was canceled in December 2018 with 14-months to run. Salmon Co received $400,000 as compensation for the loss of the contract. Salmon Co had no other income and no orders to manufacture another custom-made fishing boat. They were anticipating...
In the case of Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne, which of the following statements is...
In the case of Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne, which of the following statements is untrue? Group of answer choices Horne’s company was held to be subject to the same contractual provisions as Horne was himself The decision in Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne was overruled by the Supreme Court in Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd Horne’s company was held by the court to be a sham company The case is an example of piercing the veil of...
Please, write down King Steel Machinery Co., Ltd. Market allocation and market distribution Thanks
Please, write down King Steel Machinery Co., Ltd. Market allocation and market distribution Thanks
Case Incident-   “Could that Happen to Me?” Marlie and Johanna were cooling down after their weekly...
Case Incident-   “Could that Happen to Me?” Marlie and Johanna were cooling down after their weekly game of hockey at the local rink. While several of their team members had already left for the pub, the two millennials struck up a conversation about their lives since the last game held earlier that month. “You’ll never guess what happened to one of my co-workers earlier this week,” said Johanna.“I bet I can top whatever that was with my own story,” countered...
The Partnership Act 1890 section 24 sets out rights of partners (in default of their own...
The Partnership Act 1890 section 24 sets out rights of partners (in default of their own agreement). Which one of the following is not included in section 24? Group of answer choices The right to share equally in the capital and profits of the business. The right to be indemnified by the firm for any liabilities incurred or payments made in the course of the firm's business. The right to a salary The right to take part in the management...
Mattel Responds to Ethical Challenges Business Ethics This case was written by Debbie Thorne, John Fraedrich,...
Mattel Responds to Ethical Challenges Business Ethics This case was written by Debbie Thorne, John Fraedrich, O. C. Ferrell, and Jennifer Jackson, with the editorial assistance of Jennifer Sawayda. This case was developed for classroom discussion rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of an administrative, ethical, or legal discussion by management. All sources used for this case were obtained through publicly available material. Mattel, Inc. is a world leader in the design, manufacture, and marketing of family...
Discuss ethical issues that can be identified in this case and the mode of managing ethics...
Discuss ethical issues that can be identified in this case and the mode of managing ethics Enron finds itself in this case. How would you describe the ethical culture and levels of trust at Enron? Provide reasons for your assessment. THE FALL OF ENRON: A STAKEHOLDER FAILURE Once upon a time, there was a gleaming headquarters office tower in Houston, with a giant tilted "£"' in front, slowly revolving in the Texas sun. The Enron Corporation, which once ranked among...
CASE: Sharesies: NZ investment platform Everyday investment company Sharesies was launched in February 2017, after conducting...
CASE: Sharesies: NZ investment platform Everyday investment company Sharesies was launched in February 2017, after conducting research on New Zealanders’ attitudes towards investing. Prior to launching the company, the co-founders interviewed over 200 people asking them “If I gave you $50 right now, and you had to do something with it in the next 5 minutes what would you do?” Only 5 out of 200 people chose an option to save or invest the $50. More popular options were bills,...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT