Question

If we extend the MM's framework by corporate taxes (but no distress costs) then a) Equity...

If we extend the MM's framework by corporate taxes (but no distress costs) then

a) Equity becomes more attractive because it is subject to corporate tax and we can take advantage of the tax shield

b) Interest payments on debt are tax deductible which increases the Weighted average cost of capital for high levels of debt relative to the standard MM framework

c) The present value of future tax savings increases the market value of the firm

d) More than one answer is correct

Homework Answers

Answer #1

When the tax shield that will be resulting out of the tax detectable interest payment will be making the value of levered company higher than the value of unlevered company and it can be said that the present value of future tax saving increase the market value of company.

All the other options are false as we donot have to consider distress cost and interest payment on the debt are tax deductible which will be lowering the overall weighted average cost of capital.

Correct answer is option ( C) the present value of future tax saving increases the market value of firm

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
When corporate taxes and the cost of financial distress are taken into consideration, the market value...
When corporate taxes and the cost of financial distress are taken into consideration, the market value of a firm is equal to the value of the all-equity firm ________ the PV of the tax shield ________ the costs of financial distress.
According to Modigliani and Miller (1963 which allows for the presence of the corporate taxes), which...
According to Modigliani and Miller (1963 which allows for the presence of the corporate taxes), which of the following is/are true? a. an increase in the corporate tax rate will increase the value of the debt tax shield, ceteris paribus (holding all else constant) b. firms will maximize value as the D/TA ratio approaches 100% c. WACC continues to decrease as we use more and more debt d. only a & b are correct e. a, b, and c are...
If we acknowledge the existence of corporate taxes (while still ignoring other market imperfections such as...
If we acknowledge the existence of corporate taxes (while still ignoring other market imperfections such as bankruptcy), which of the following statements about capital structure is true according to M&M? Statement I: Increasing leverage will increases the required return on equity but will not change the value of the firm. Statement II: Increasing leverage will increase the value of the firm. Statement III: Increasing leverage will increase the present value of the tax shield.
The basic point being made by Modigliani and Miller is that in the absence of taxes...
The basic point being made by Modigliani and Miller is that in the absence of taxes and transaction costs 1. the optimal capital structure balances the firm’s tax-shield and financial distress costs. 2. a firm cannot change the total value of its outstanding securities by changing its capital structure 3. greater debt leads to a lower weighted-average cost of capital and greater firm value. 4. we must account for the timing and risk of cash flows in order to properly...
n year 1, AMC will earn $1,600 before interest and taxes. The market expects these earnings...
n year 1, AMC will earn $1,600 before interest and taxes. The market expects these earnings to grow at a rate of 2.7% per year. The firm will make no net investments (i.e., capital expenditures will equal depreciation) or changes to net working capital. Assume that the corporate tax rate equals 45%. Right now, the firm has $4,000 in risk-free debt. It plans to keep a constant ratio of debt to equity every year, so that on average the debt...
1. A company is financed 60% by debt and 40% by equity. The pre-tax cost of...
1. A company is financed 60% by debt and 40% by equity. The pre-tax cost of debt is currently 10%. The Finance Director has stated that the weighted average cost of capital for the company is 9.6%. What is the cost of equity? Assume the tax rate is 40%. 2. What weakness does the NPV method have that is not present in the payback method? Group of answer choices: a Initial cash flows are ignored. b The NPV method is...
We present 2 examples of the corporate valuation model. In the first problem, we assume that...
We present 2 examples of the corporate valuation model. In the first problem, we assume that the firm is a mature company so its free cash flows grow at a constant rate. In the second problem, we assume that the firm has a period of nonconstant growth. a. Assume today is December 31, 2019. Barrington Industries expects that its 2020 after-tax operating income [EBIT(1 – T)] will be $410 million and its 2020 depreciation expense will be $60 million. Barrington's...
Suppose the portfolio of a large institutional investor “Parthenon” has an expected return of 13 percent...
Suppose the portfolio of a large institutional investor “Parthenon” has an expected return of 13 percent and its beta relative to the market portfolio is 2, while its return’s standard deviation is 8 percent. Suppose there is a firm called “Atlantis”, whose equity beta is 2. The equity value of “Atlantis” is £1 million and its debt is worth £1.5 million. Its debt is a consol bond (i.e. perpetual bond) with an annual coupon of £45,000. The present value of...
We can express a firm in terms of a call/put option. In this context, the equity...
We can express a firm in terms of a call/put option. In this context, the equity in the firm is like the (a) with its strike price being the face value of debt. From another perspective, stockholders position is equivalent to holding a portfolio of a long 2 position of the (b), a short position of the (c), and a long position of the (d). Which of the following has the correct answers for blanks (a)-(d) in that order? A....
The United States federal government is responsible for meeting the spending obligations of the US government,...
The United States federal government is responsible for meeting the spending obligations of the US government, or its "unpaid bills." Krugman & Wells (2015), explained if taxes are insufficient to cover government spending then the federal government must borrow to cover the difference. These government borrowing are US Treasuries (Chapter 10, Matching Up Savings and Investment Spending). Reuters (2018, February 18) reported, “…tax reform is expected to add as much as $1.5 trillion to the federal debt load, while the...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT