Question

The case WorldCom On 9 June 2003, the US Bankruptcy Court of New York issued an...

The case
WorldCom
On 9 June 2003, the US Bankruptcy Court of New York issued an interim report (Thornburgh, 2003) which expanded on the Court’s earlier find- ings (Thornburgh, 2002) of lack of corporate gov- ernance, mismanagement and concern regarding the integrity of WorldCom’s accounting and fi- nancial reporting functions. Amongst the numer- ous incidents of mismanagement, corporate gov- ernance failure and accounting irregularities, the most salient related to the overstatement of re- ported profitability by inappropriately capitaliz- ing very significant elements of operating costs. In June and August 2002, WorldCom restated its previously filed financial figures by $3.8 and $3.3 billion, respectively, primarily in relation to this failure to charge operating costs to the profit and loss account appropriately. The trigger for these re- statements in part was an internal audit investiga- tion into the capitalization of operating costs – al- though this only took place after the departure of WorldCom’s dominant CEO and the replacement of Andersen as the external auditor by KPMG. Indeed, an internal audit of capital expenditure a year previously had become aware of the existence of $2.3 billion of ‘corporate accruals’ in relation to
capital expenditure, but had made no attempt to verify the nature and propriety of these ‘accruals’. Internal audit at WorldCom was an in-house department first set up in a small way in 1993,
but which had subsequently grown in numbers –
although it was never heavily resourced relative
to internal audit departments in other companies
of a similar size. Formally it had a dual report-
ing responsibility – reporting to both the Chief
Financial Officer (CFO) and the audit committee,
although the bankruptcy examiner had no doubt
that its functional reporting responsibilities were
to the CFO and that its existence and role were
3
very much at the behest of senior management. This perceived dependence upon executive man- agement for resources led to the work programme concentrating almost exclusively on operational aspects, focusing on audits and projects that would be seen as adding ‘value’ to the company, and seeking to identify ways to maximize revenues, reduce costs and improve efficiencies. It did not involve itself in financial auditing per se, and even when it did check accounting entries to subsidiary ledgers it did not normally follow these through to the general ledger – apparently to avoid the perception of the duplication of work with the external auditors Andersen.
The report of the bankruptcy examiner (Thorn- burgh, 2004) also provides evidence of lack of uniform procedures within the internal audit department relating to the conduct of audits, preparation of reports, review of management responses and follow-up procedures; a lack of co- operation with internal audit by line management; limited access by internal auditing staff to the com- pany’s computerized accounting and reporting systems; unwarranted influence by management in the preparation and negotiation of the internal audit reports; and a lack of a systematic approach in relation to highlighting serious internal con- trol weaknesses and tracking of management responses and corrective action taken.
Another aspect of the corporate governance paradigm highlighted by the WorldCom case re- lates to the cooperation and liaison, or rather lack of it, between the internal auditors, the external auditors and the audit committee. WorldCom had an audit committee constituted in accordance with the requirements of the Blue Ribbon Committee (1999) and, over the relevant period, consisting of
four non-executive directors with varying degrees
of business experience and expertise. The commit-
tee met three to five times a year and at each meet-
ing would, inter alia, receive an information pack
prepared by the Director of Internal Audit and
on occasion would receive presentations from her.
Formally, internal audit reported to the audit com-
mittee but as the report notes: ‘while most mem-
bers of the Audit Committee perceived the Inter-
nal Audit Department as reporting to the Audit
Committee, that was not the case, functionally or practically’. The audit committee only received executive summaries of the actual audit reports, rarely the full reports. Perhaps more importantly, the members of the audit committee appear to have assumed there to be a much greater degree of co- ordination between internal audit and external au- dit than actually took place, and were not aware that Andersen did not receive copies of the internal audit reports. In fact, communication between internal audit and external audit was very limited, being largely restricted to joint attendance at the meetings of the audit committee. The lack of communication between the two is highlighted in relation to the ability of the external auditor to provide annual reassurance to the audit committee on the absence of material weaknesses in the company’s systems of internal control, notwithstanding the existence of internal audit reports, some of which documented significant such weaknesses. It also appears to have been a factor in the failure referred to above of internal audit to conduct meaningful financial audit, even when aware of circumstances which might have been expected to prompt further investigation.
Questions
1) Based on the paper identify four(4) coperate governance weaknesses of WorldCom
2) Adduce respective recommendations to address each weakness identified, to ensure compliance with corporate governance principles.
3) Based on the paper and the corporate governance principles set out in the preamble above, identify and explain the following:
i. Four (4) actions that the board chairmen of the firm should have taken in order to meet corporate governance requirements for the firm.

ii. Four (4) actions that the chief executive officer of the firm should have taken in order to meet corporate governance requirements for the firms.

iii. Four (4) actions that the non-executive directors on the management boards of the firm should have taken in order to meet corporate governance requirements for the firm.

iv. Six (6) actions that the audit committee boards of the firm should have taken in order to meet corporate governance requirements for the firm.

v. Three (3) actions that the risk management committee of the firm should have taken in order to meet corporate governance requirements for the firm.

vi. Two (2) actions that the remuneration committee of the firm should have taken in order to meet corporate governance requirements for the firm.

vii. Four (4) actions that the internal auditors of the firm should have taken in order to meet corporate governance requirements for the firm.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

1. Four corporate governance weakness of worldcom are as follows-

A. Inappropriate reporting of accounting figure and window dressing of accounting figure so that it can present Rosy picture of books of accounts.

B. Over statement of continuous profitability by over capitalisation of operating cost had led to failure of corporate governance.

C. Nexus between the auditors and the board of the directors to inflate the books of accounts so that the true picture of the company cannot be reported.

D. Too much reliability and dependence upon the top level of the organisation and which has resulted into inflation of the profitability figure which will be leading to weak Corporate governance

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
You are an audit manager of PY and have been assigned to the audit of TT...
You are an audit manager of PY and have been assigned to the audit of TT Co (TT), a company which is planning to list on a stock exchange within six months. The listing rules of the stock exchange require compliance with corporate governance principles, and the directors are unsure whether they are following best practices in relation to this. They have asked the audit engagement partner for their view on this matter. TT’s board is comprised of six executive...
The WorldCom fraud was the largest in U.S. history, surpassing even that of Enron. Beginning modestly...
The WorldCom fraud was the largest in U.S. history, surpassing even that of Enron. Beginning modestly during mid-year 1999 and continuing at an accelerated pace through May 2002, the company—under the direction of Bernie Ebbers, the CEO; Scott Sullivan, the CFO; David Myers, the controller; and Buford Yates, the director of accounting—“cooked the books” to the tune of about $11 billion of misstated earnings. Investors collectively lost $30 billion as a result of the fraud. The fraud was accomplished primarily...
Case Analysis Answer the assignment questions for this exercise after reading Chapter 2 and Concepts &...
Case Analysis Answer the assignment questions for this exercise after reading Chapter 2 and Concepts & Connections 2.4. The mini case is also provided below. The exercise should help you become aware of the role and responsibility of a company's board of directors in overseeing the strategic management process. Executive compensation in the financial services industry during the mid-2000s ranks high among examples of failed corporate governance. Corporate governance at the government-sponsored mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was...
You are the internal auditor of SuperHero Ltd and you have made the following notes during...
You are the internal auditor of SuperHero Ltd and you have made the following notes during the audit of the company’s inventory management activities: SuperHero Ltd’s raw materials are mainly high-cost electronic components. The raw materials are kept in a locked warehouse. The warehouse team has a manager and four clerks. Raw materials are removed from the warehouse only on written or oral authorization of one of the production supervisors of the factory. SuperHero Ltd uses a period inventory system....
You are the internal auditor of SuperHero Ltd and you have made the following notes during...
You are the internal auditor of SuperHero Ltd and you have made the following notes during the audit of the company’s inventory management activities: SuperHero Ltd’s raw materials are mainly high-cost electronic components. The raw materials are kept in a locked warehouse. The warehouse team has a manager and four clerks. Raw materials are removed from the warehouse only on written or oral authorization of one of the production supervisors of the factory. SuperHero Ltd uses a period inventory system....
In a bizarre twist to a bizarre story, on October 22, 2013, Deloitte agreed to pay...
In a bizarre twist to a bizarre story, on October 22, 2013, Deloitte agreed to pay a $2 million penalty to settle civil charges—brought by the PCAOB—that the firm violated federal audit rules by allowing its former partner to continue participating in the firm’s public company audit practice, even though he had been suspended over other rule violations. The former partner, Christopher Anderson, settled with the PCAOB in 2008 by agreeing to a $25,000 fine and a one-year suspension for...
HORIZONTAL GROWTH AT KOLEDA PURERENT, INC. CASE SYNOPSIS The case of Koleda PureRent, Inc. illustrates how...
HORIZONTAL GROWTH AT KOLEDA PURERENT, INC. CASE SYNOPSIS The case of Koleda PureRent, Inc. illustrates how a smaller firm can achieve market power and survive through horizontal integration. Growth, however is only the beginning of a successful strategic process. It does not in sure long-term success, as there are numerous strategic challenges for this and other firms in similar circumstances. The firm has reached a size that could attract the attention of larger competitors. This new level of competition would...
Unhealthy Accounting at HealthSouth PROBLEM In 1996, key executives of HealthSouth, one of the nation’s largest...
Unhealthy Accounting at HealthSouth PROBLEM In 1996, key executives of HealthSouth, one of the nation’s largest providers of health care services, began a massive fraud that eventually amounted to $2.7 billion. HealthSouth is a textbook case of unbridled greed combined with a lack of corporate governance, which illustrates the difficult situation that auditors face when clients perpetrate a massive, collusive fraud. HealthSouth was founded in 1984 by Richard Scrushy and coworkers at Lifemark, a Houston-based company that owned and managed...
Evaluating a potential client requires which of the following steps? Question 21 options: 1) Communicate with...
Evaluating a potential client requires which of the following steps? Question 21 options: 1) Communicate with the predecessor auditor. 2) Preplan the audit. 3) Establish the terms of the engagement. 4) None of these. Question 22 (3 points) What factor would most likely would cause a CPA not to accept a new audit engagement? Question 22 options: 1) the prospective client's unwillingness to permit inquiry of its legal counsel 2) the inability to review the predecessor auditor's documentation 3) the...
Government is cleaning up the way companies do business after accounting and governance scandals rocked investor...
Government is cleaning up the way companies do business after accounting and governance scandals rocked investor confidence and damaged the reputation of companies large and small. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) of 2002 was enacted in response to the high-profile Enron and World Com financial scandals to protect shareholders and the public from accounting errors and fraudulent practices by organizations. One primary component of the SOX is the definition of which records are to be stored and for how long. For...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT