Question

Which of the following statements is FALSE about product liability suits brought in strict liability? Most...

Which of the following statements is FALSE about product liability suits brought in strict liability?

Most courts will award damages in strict liability only for personal or property loss, not for economic loss.

The statute of limitations is longer for suits in strict liability than for lawsuits based on breach of warranty.

Under Restatement (Third) of Torts, plaintiffs in strict liability cases need only prove the existence of a manufacturing defect, not that the defect was unreasonably dangerous.

Claims filed in strict liability do not have the same notice requirements as claims based on breach of warranty.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Claims filed in strict liability do not have the same notice requirements as claims based on breach of warranty is false.

The reason behind is that both strict liability and breach of warranty are the most common claim associated with product liability and they both have the same notice requirements. Strict liability is associated with the manufacturing defects and breach of warranty is related to the express and implied warranty. In both the cases claims filed must have the same noticwe requirements.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Which of the following statements about product liability is true? a. it may be pursued against...
Which of the following statements about product liability is true? a. it may be pursued against all sellers, including those at a local yard sale b. product liability cases are based on breach of warranty c. misuse of the product will usually protect the seller against liability d. the person injured by the product must prove privity of contract e. all of these are correct
Liebeck v. McDonalds Restaurants: The Original Coffee Product Liability Case James M. Dedman, IV Back in...
Liebeck v. McDonalds Restaurants: The Original Coffee Product Liability Case James M. Dedman, IV Back in 1994, Stella Liebeck v. McDonalds Restaurants became one of the most talked about lawsuits in American history. To this day, that New Mexico state court case is an essential component of any tort reform debate or discussion of litigation lore. At that time, and to this day, the thought of a fast food drive-thru customer spilling coffee on herself in her vehicle and later...
The following appeared in a brief article in a major business newspaper: A local court is...
The following appeared in a brief article in a major business newspaper: A local court is in the process of ruling on whether the public accounting firm of James Willis and Co., CPAs, PC, should be required to pay all or part of $16 million in damages relating to Geiger Co. for failing to detect a scheme to defraud the company, a former audit client. Geiger Co., an SEC registrant, charges that Willis was negligent in failing to discover fraud...
The differences & similarities between the federal & state court systems. 2. The structure of the...
The differences & similarities between the federal & state court systems. 2. The structure of the Washington state court system; i.e. the trial court of general jurisdiction, the intermediate appellate court, the state supreme court. 3. Remember, Washington is in the 9 th Circuit Court of Appeals. 4. Under both the Washington state and federal court system, there is one appeal as of right. Appeals to the Washington Supreme Court(in the state system), or to the U.S. Supreme Court in...
Under the LB&I Directive on Information Document Requests Enforcement Process, all of the following are part...
Under the LB&I Directive on Information Document Requests Enforcement Process, all of the following are part of the mandatory enforcement process, except: Delinquency Notice. Notice of Deficiency. Pre-summons Letter. Summons. Miles Patrick’s timely filed Form 1040 for the 2010 tax year is selected for audit and the Service ultimately issues a timely SNOD asserting $100,000 in additional tax due arising from Miles’ failure to substantiate business expenses. (The Service never provided Miles with a 30-day letter). Miles does not file...
Please read the article and answear about questions. Determining the Value of the Business After you...
Please read the article and answear about questions. Determining the Value of the Business After you have completed a thorough and exacting investigation, you need to analyze all the infor- mation you have gathered. This is the time to consult with your business, financial, and legal advis- ers to arrive at an estimate of the value of the business. Outside advisers are impartial and are more likely to see the bad things about the business than are you. You should...
What role could the governance of ethics have played if it had been in existence in...
What role could the governance of ethics have played if it had been in existence in the organization? Assess the leadership of Enron from an ethical perspective. THE FALL OF ENRON: A STAKEHOLDER FAILURE Once upon a time, there was a gleaming headquarters office tower in Houston, with a giant tilted "£"' in front, slowly revolving in the Texas sun. The Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies, collapsed in 2001 under a mountain of debt...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT