You are currently an investor in Bethes mining that earns an EBIT of $ 10,000 each year. The firm’s total assets are currently worth $ 80,000. 30% of the firm’s assets are currently funded by debt at a cost of 8%. There are totally 1000 shares outstanding of which you own 10 shares. In the recent board meeting, the executives have come up with the decision to push the firm’s leverage to 45% by replacing suitable amount of equity with debt. Suppose there are no taxes, the firm’s WACC is 10%, and you can lend/borrow at 8%, prove that increasing leverage is a value neutral proposition for you.
EBIT | 10000 | 10000 | ||
WACC | 10% | 10% | ||
Equity (100000*70%) | 70000 | Equity (100000*55%)= | 55000 | 1000/70000*55000=785.71 shares |
Debt(100000*30%) | 30000 | Debt(100000*45%)= | 45000 | |
Total assets | 100000 | Total assets | 100000 | |
Value of firm at 10%(EBIT/10%) | 100000 | 100000 | ||
Less: Value of debt | 30000 | 45000 | ||
Value of 1000 shares of Equity | 70000 | 55000 | 785.7143 | |
Value of 10 shares(70000/1000*10) | 700 | 55000/785.7143*10= | 700 |
Thus proved that increasing leverage is a value neutral proposition for the holder of 10 shares |
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.