Question

several years ago the Wall Street Journal reported that the winner of the Massachusetts state lottery...

several years ago the Wall Street Journal reported that the winner of the Massachusetts state lottery prize had the misfortune to be both bankrupt and in prison for fraud. The price was $9,420,713 to be paid in 19 equal annual installments. (There were 20 installments, but the winner had already received the first payment.) The bankruptcy court judge ruled that the prize should be sold off to the highest bidder and the proceeds used to pay off the creditors. If the interest rate was 8%, how much would you have been prepared for the prize ?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

The value of the prize is the present value of the 19 equal annual installments.

Each equal annual installment = prize money / 20 =  $9,420,713 / 20 = $471,035.65

(There are 20 equal annual installments in total, however only 19 will be received by you, since 1 is already paid to the winner).

PV of annuity = P * [1 - (1 + r)-n] / r,

where P = periodic payment

r = interest rate per period

n = number of periods

Here, P = equal annual installment, which is $471,035.65

r = annual interest rate, which is 8%

n = number of years, which is 19.

PV of annuity = $471,035.65 * [1 - (1 + 0.08)-19] / 0.08,

PV of annuity = $4,523,637.59

You would be prepared to pay $4,523,637.59 for the prize

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Bob, Chad and Dylan had been dreaming of this day for the past six years; ever...
Bob, Chad and Dylan had been dreaming of this day for the past six years; ever since they first met in an introductory economics course in college. For several years they had been pooling their money and buying Arizona Lottery tickets dreaming that one day they would win big. They realized that the lottery was considered by many to be a voluntary tax on the statistically challenged. But miraculously they now sat at their favorite local �watering hole� holding the...
What role could the governance of ethics have played if it had been in existence in...
What role could the governance of ethics have played if it had been in existence in the organization? Assess the leadership of Enron from an ethical perspective. THE FALL OF ENRON: A STAKEHOLDER FAILURE Once upon a time, there was a gleaming headquarters office tower in Houston, with a giant tilted "£"' in front, slowly revolving in the Texas sun. The Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies, collapsed in 2001 under a mountain of debt...
Discuss ethical issues that can be identified in this case and the mode of managing ethics...
Discuss ethical issues that can be identified in this case and the mode of managing ethics Enron finds itself in this case. How would you describe the ethical culture and levels of trust at Enron? Provide reasons for your assessment. THE FALL OF ENRON: A STAKEHOLDER FAILURE Once upon a time, there was a gleaming headquarters office tower in Houston, with a giant tilted "£"' in front, slowly revolving in the Texas sun. The Enron Corporation, which once ranked among...
Discuss how the respective organizations’ relations with stakeholders could have potentially been affected by the events...
Discuss how the respective organizations’ relations with stakeholders could have potentially been affected by the events that took place at Enron and how the situation could have been dealt with differently to prevent further damage? THE FALL OF ENRON: A STAKEHOLDER FAILURE Once upon a time, there was a gleaming headquarters office tower in Houston, with a giant tilted "£"' in front, slowly revolving in the Texas sun. The Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies,...
During the trial, lawyers for the accused said that the men believed that the accounting decisions...
During the trial, lawyers for the accused said that the men believed that the accounting decisions they made were appropriate at the time, and that the accounting treatment was approved by Nortel’s auditors from Deloitte & Touche. Judge Marrocco accepted these arguments. Marrocco added he was “not satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt” that the trio (i.e., Dunn, Beatty, and Gollogly) had “deliberately misrepresented” financial results. Given the facts of the case, do you believe Judge Marrocco’s decision was justified? Explain....