2. Consider an existing project with an annual cash generation of $8000 expected to last 15 years. If an additional single investment of $10,000 is made, the cash flow will be accelerated to $12,000 per year but would last only 10 years, since no new cash was generated.
a) Generate a cash flow table for this project
b) Analyse the profitability of this accelerated project using discounted cash flow rate of return.
(No discount rate was given)
Year | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
Cashflow | 0 | 8000 | 8000 | 8000 | 8000 | 8000 | 8000 | 8000 | 8000 | 8000 | 8000 | 8000 | 8000 | 8000 | 8000 | 8000 |
NPVA | $19,894.82 | |||||||||||||||
Year | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |||||
Cashflow | -10000 | 12000 | 12000 | 12000 | 12000 | 12000 | 12000 | 12000 | 12000 | 12000 | 12000 | |||||
NPVB | $19,842.22 |
Cash flow table is given above, while looking into it we can say that both project at 10% wacc will be alomost equal. If the WACC is more than 10% then one should select exisitng project and if the WACC is less than 10% then accelerated project will be a better option.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.