Is the following statement accurate? Please provide a numerical reasoning to support your claim. A firm that is debt-using with a negative leverage gain will always have a return on equity that is negative.
If Return on Investment is less than cost of borrowing(negative leverage) then there will be erosion of Net worth (ie equity)
Eg suppose I borrow $100,000 @10%pa and invest the same in a project that earns me a return @ 5% see what happens
CF from project $105,000
Less Interest $10000
Balance $95000
Less Principal Repayment $100,000
Decrease in my net worth $5000
ie negative Equity means I have to break my FDs in order to pay off this liability and therefore my net worth is eroded to the tune of $5000
higher the borrowing higher the erosion of networth (if Return on Investment is less than cost of borrowing)
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.