Portfolio Weights (%) |
Benchmark Weights (%) |
Portfolio Sector Returns (%) |
Benchmark Sector Returns (%) |
|
Consumer Discretionary |
25 |
20 |
12 |
16 |
Health Care |
25 |
15 |
10 |
7 |
Industrials |
10 |
20 |
5 |
5 |
Technology |
30 |
20 |
25 |
20 |
Real Estate |
10 |
25 |
18 |
15 |
The portfolio performance is 0.25*12%+0.25*10%+0.1*5%+0.3*25%+0.1*18%= 15.3%
Benchmark performance is 0.2*16%+0.15*7%+0.2*5%+0.2*20%+0.25*15%= 13%.
So, the portfolio outperformed the benchmark by 2.3%
Lets consider Allocation effect.
It can be calculated as (Portfolio weight-Benchmark weight)*(Benchmark return)= (25%-20%)*16%+(25%-15%)*7%+(10%-20%)*5%+(30%-20%)*20%+(10%-25%)*15%= 0.75%.
Allocation effect contributes to the portfolio performance by allocating assets of a portfolio to different segments. By overweighing or underweighing the segments with respect to the benchmark results in the allocation effect of the portfolio.
Lets consider selection effect.
It can be calculated as (Portfolio return-Benchmark return)*(Benchmark weight)= (12%-16%)*20%+(10%-7%)*15%+0+(25%-20%)*20%+(18%-15%)*25%= 1.4%
Selection effect contributes to the portfolio performance by decisions within each sector of the portfolio. For example, in equities, selecting superior stocks compared to benchmark results in better performance of the portfolio.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.