Question

Farmer Co. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects...

Farmer Co. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and repeatable.

Year                           0                1                2                3                4

CFS                          -$900         $800          $600                 

CFL                          -$700         $300          $200          $400          $200

WACC: 10%

Given the two projects are of different length and both are repeatable, one suggestion is to use the replacement chain approach in evaluation. If this approach is used, which project will you choose? Show the calculations and explain your decision.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Please refer to the image below for the solution. The WACC is used to discount the two projects to find their NPVs.

Please let me know in the comment section below if you have questions.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Farmer Co. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects...
Farmer Co. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and repeatable. Year                           0                1                2                3                4 CFS                          -$900         $800          $600                  CFL                          -$700         $300          $200          $400          $200 WACC: 10% Given the two projects are of different length and both are repeatable, one suggestion is to use the replacement chain approach in evaluation. If this approach is used, which project will you choose? Show the calculations...
Moerdyk & Co. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These...
Moerdyk & Co. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? Note that under certain conditions choosing projects on the basis of the IRR will not cause any value to be lost because the one with the higher IRR will also have the higher NPV, i.e., no...
Moerdyk & Co. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These...
Moerdyk & Co. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? Note that under certain conditions choosing projects on the basis of the IRR will not cause any value to be lost because the one with the higher IRR will also have the higher NPV, i.e., no...
Moerdyk & Co. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These...
Moerdyk & Co. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? Note that under certain conditions choosing projects on the basis of the IRR will not cause any value to be lost because the one with the higher IRR will also have the higher NPV, i.e., no...
Using Excel (if applicable), CocaCola is considering Projects X and Y, whose cash flows are shown...
Using Excel (if applicable), CocaCola is considering Projects X and Y, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. What is the crossover rate and what does it tell management? WACC: 9% 0 1 2 3 4 CFS -$1,000 $950 $750 $550 $350 CFL -$1,000 $500 $600 $700 $1000
Tinner Corp. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects...
Tinner Corp. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO believes the IRR is the best selection criterion, while the CFO advocates the NPV. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much, if any, value will be forgone, i.e., what's the chosen NPV versus the maximum possible NPV?   WACC:...
A firm is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects...
A firm is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO wants to use the IRR criterion, while the CFO favors the NPV method, and you were hired to advise the firm on the best procedure. If the CEO's preferred criterion is used, how much value will the firm lose as a result of this decision? WACC: 13.00% 0 1 2 3 4 CFS -$1,025...
a firm is considering projects S and L whose cash flows are shown below. these projects...
a firm is considering projects S and L whose cash flows are shown below. these projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. the ceo wants to use the IRR criterion, while the cfo favors the npv method. you were hired to advise the firm on the best procedure. if the wrong decision criterion is used, how much potential value would the firm lose? wacc: 7.75% 0. 1. 2. 3. 4. cfs -1,025. 380. 380. 380. 380 cfl -2,150....
Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally...
Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO believes the IRR is the best selection criterion, while the CFO advocates the NPV. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much, if any, value will be forgone, i.e., what's the chosen NPV versus the maximum possible NPV? WACC=8.75% Year 0 Year 1...
Kosovski Company is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects...
Kosovski Company is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and are not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? Note that under some conditions choosing projects on the basis of the IRR will cause $0.00 value to be lost. WACC: 6.25% 0 1 2 3 4 CFS -$1,050 $675 $650 CFL -$1,050 $360 $360 $360...