Question

Assume the price of a Big Mac in the U.S. is​ $5.99 and the price in...

Assume the price of a Big Mac in the U.S. is​ $5.99 and the price in Turkey is 29 Turkish Lira​ (TRY). Thus, according to PPP and the Law of One​ Price, at the current exchange rate the TRY​ is: A. undervalued B. Insufficient information to answer this question C. correctly valued D. overvalued

Business   Finance   
0 0
Add a commentTranscribed image text
Next >

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Data provided here is not sufficient because the exchange rate would have been given in order to determine whether the price of big Mac in United States is undervalued or overvalued with comparison to its price in Turkish Lira.

To answer this question we will either need,inflation rate between both the countries or the exchange rate between both the countries in order to find out the purchase price parity.

Correct answer is option (B) insufficient data to answer the question.

0 0
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Log In

Sign Up

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
If the price of a Big Mac in the country of Hatchland is 4.25 Hatch dollars...
If the price of a Big Mac in the country of Hatchland is 4.25 Hatch dollars ($H4.25), the price of a Big Mac in the US is $5.30, and the exchange rate between the $H and the $ is $1.10/$H, assuming a Big Mac is a good representation of the cost of goods in both countries, according to PPP is the Hatch dollar overvalued, undervalued, or correctly valued. Please show your calculations to prove your argument. (4 points)
As of Jan 2012, in Canada a Big Mac costs $4.20. In Turkey it costs 6.5...
As of Jan 2012, in Canada a Big Mac costs $4.20. In Turkey it costs 6.5 Lira for the same product. According to the PPP theory, what would you expect the dollar-lira exchange rate (lira/$) to be? If the actual exchange rate was 0.93 (lira/$), does this imply that the Lira is being over or under valued?
Find the current prices of a Big Mac in China and U.S. Find the current nominal...
Find the current prices of a Big Mac in China and U.S. Find the current nominal exchange rate. According to the Big Mac Index, is RMB (or Chinese Yuan) currently overvalued or undervalued? By how much? (Show all the steps)
In the US, the price of a Big Mac is $3.5. In China, the price of...
In the US, the price of a Big Mac is $3.5. In China, the price of a Big Mac is ￥12. a. What is the exchange rate of Chinese Yuan under purchasing power parity? b. What is the dollar price of Big Mac in China, if the actual exchange rate is $0.15/￥? c. Is the Chinese Yuan overvalued or undervalued? By how much? d. If China’s GDP in 2018 is ￥80 Trillion, what is its Nominal GDP in USD (use...
Suppose Big Mac costs 120 pesos in Mexico City and 6 pounds in London. If the...
Suppose Big Mac costs 120 pesos in Mexico City and 6 pounds in London. If the current exchange rate is 25 pesos per pound, then according to law of one price, pound is ______ and should _______ in the long run. undervalued; appreciate overvalued; depreciate overvalued; appreciate undervalued; depreciate
In Norway, a Big Mac costs 65 Norwegian Krone (NOK), while in the United States, the...
In Norway, a Big Mac costs 65 Norwegian Krone (NOK), while in the United States, the average cost is $5.71. The implied (Purchasing Power Parity) exchange rate is ___________. The current exchange rate is NOK 9.09/$. The $ cost of a Big Mac in Norway at the current exchange rate is ___________. The NOK is _____________. Group of answer choices NOK11.3835/$; $7.15; 25.2% overvalued. NOK11.3835/$; $7.15; 25.2% undervalued. NOK 11.3835/$; $5.71; correctly valued. None of the above.
1.Suppose that a Big Mac costs $5.79 in the US, and CHF 6.5 in Switzerland. You...
1.Suppose that a Big Mac costs $5.79 in the US, and CHF 6.5 in Switzerland. You are told that the exchange rate between $ and CHF is CHF=$0.5 From what you know about PPP theory and Law of One Price, the swiss franc is ____________ (undervalued/overvalued/just right) 2.Suppose that a Big Mac costs $5.79 in the US, and CHF 6.5 in Switzerland. You are told that the exchange rate between $ and CHF is CHF=$0.5 From what you know about...
Some people read tea leaves to predict the future, The Economist magazine prefers hamburgers. The magazine...
Some people read tea leaves to predict the future, The Economist magazine prefers hamburgers. The magazine started the Big Mac Index in 1986 as a light-hearted guide to test whether currencies are at their “correct” exchange rate based on the Law of One Price. Under the Law of One Price, the price of the Big Mac should be the same if its local price is converted into dollars at the current exchange rates. Currently, the average price of a Big...
4. The Economist publishes annually the ”hamburger standard” by which they compare the prices of the...
4. The Economist publishes annually the ”hamburger standard” by which they compare the prices of the McDonalds Corporation Big Mac hamburger around the world. The index estimates the exchange rates for currencies based on the assumption that the burgers in question are the same across the world and therefore, the price should be the same. A Big Mac costs USD2.54 in the United States and JPY294 in Japan. The current exchange rate is 124 Japanese yen per U.S. dollar. (a)...
The Economist magazine uses the price of a Big Mac to determine whether a currency is...
The Economist magazine uses the price of a Big Mac to determine whether a currency is undervalued or overvalued. In July​ 2017, the price of a Big Mac was​ $5.30 in New​ York, 19.80 yuan in​ Beijing, and 6.50 Swiss francs in Geneva. The exchange rates were 6.79 yuan per U.S. dollar and 0.96 Swiss francs per U.S. dollar. The price of a Big Mac in different countries​ _______ provide a valid test of purchasing power parity because​ _______. A....
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT