Patagonia and Columbia Sportswear released the following
financial statement information:
Patagonia | Columbia Sportswear | |||
(in thousands) | 2019 | (in millions) | 2019 | |
Year-end accounts payable | $ 1,242 | Year-end accounts payable | $ 203,872 | |
Average accounts payable | 1,193 | Average accounts payable | 190,373 | |
Sales | 16,148 | Sales | 3,305,802 | |
Cost of goods sold | 9,855 | Cost of goods sold | 2,191,803 |
Which of the two companies listed above is leaning on the
trade more?
Patagonia because its accounts payable turnover is higher and its accounts payable days outstanding is lower. |
||
Columbia because its accounts payable turnover is lower and its accounts payable days outstanding is higher. |
||
Columbia because its accounts payable turnover is higher and its accounts payable days outstanding is lower. |
||
Patagonia because its accounts payable turnover is lower and its accounts payable days outstanding is higher. |
Patagonia Sportswear Account Paybale turnover = COGS/ Average account Payable
Patagonia Sportswear Account Paybale turnover = 9,855/ 1,193
Patagonia Sportswear Account Paybale turnover = 8.261
Columbia Account Paybale turnover = COGS/ Average account Payable
Columbia Account Paybale turnover = 2,191,803/ 190,373
Columbia Account Paybale turnover = 11.51
Patagonia Sportswear APDO = Year end account Payable/ (COGS/365)
Patagonia Sportswear APDO = 1,242/ (9,855/365)
Patagonia Sportswear APDO = 46 days
Columbia APDO = Year end account Payable/ (COGS/365)
Columbia APDO = 203,872/ (2,191,803/ 365)
Columbia APDO = 33.95 days
A company is said to be leaning on the trade more when it has lower account paybale turnover and higher account payable day outstanding
Patagonia Sportswear has lower account paybale turnover and higher account payable day outstanding
Option D is correct
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.