Why is Anheuser Busch InBev's Gross Profit Margin and Operating Profit Margin so much higher than that of it's competitors? Is it a different approach to classifying expenses? If yes, what do they do differently?
See financial tables below
Gross Profit Margin
AB InBev |
Heineken |
Kirin |
Molson Coors |
|
2013 |
59.3 |
36.5 |
42.9 |
39.84 |
2014 |
60.1 |
37.4 |
43 |
39.87 |
2015 |
60.7 |
37 |
44.1 |
40.25 |
2016 |
60.9 |
37.5 |
44.2 |
38.84 |
2017 |
62 |
37.9 |
42.5 |
43.49 |
Operating Profit Margin
AB InBev |
Heineken |
Kirin |
Molson Coors |
|
2013 |
32.7 |
12.12 |
6.3 |
11.1 |
2014 |
32.44 |
13.95 |
5.2 |
11.8 |
2015 |
31.78 |
12.99 |
5.7 |
11.15 |
2016 |
28.93 |
13.03 |
11.32 |
6.3 |
2017 |
31.17 |
14.8 |
10.6 |
15.93 |
For giving a brief overview, Anheuser Busch InBev's comes under the industry category of consumer staple and usually consumer staple companies usually have a higher sales leading to a consistent margin as the demand for staples is usually high and consistent.
Also by opting for lower-priced suppliers, and using labor-saving technology the cost of goods sold could come down, the company has used low-cost packaging alternative of 630-milliliter and 1-liter returnable glass bottles gives the company a competitive advantage over its other industry players in terms of managing the cost which could lead to a higher profit margin.
In terms of accounting methodology Operating Margin can be manipulated by adjusting the rate of depreciation, and amortization
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.