Question

A minor purchased a car from a dealer. After becoming an adult, the buyer drove the...

A minor purchased a car from a dealer. After becoming an adult, the buyer drove the car for 3 years and then attempted to cancel the contract, demanding a full refund with return of the car. The court would probably interpret these facts to result in

  1. An avoidance

  2. A rescission

  3. A ratification

  4. A discharge

Homework Answers

Answer #1

A minor purchased a car from a dealer. After becoming an adult, the buyer drove the car for 3 years and then attempted to cancel the contract, demanding a full refund with return of the car. The court would probably interpret these facts to result in ratification because the buyer is now adult from three years and the contract can be rectify now by assuming him/her an adult. Avoidance is not possible here because it is not timely as buyer using the car from 3 years. Therefore the court would probably interpret these facts to result in ratification where the buyer is now in contractual capacity.

Therefore correct answer is option: A rectification

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
10. Scott takes $10,000 from his bank account to set up a small donut-shop business. He...
10. Scott takes $10,000 from his bank account to set up a small donut-shop business. He meets with an attorney, and finds out he can set up a sole proprietorship for under $100, but a corporation would cost over $500 ($175 to the state, about $400 to the attorney). He decides on a sole proprietorship. He signs a one-year lease, and starts his business. After six months of operations, he closes the business because of much-lower-than-expected sales. After using the...
During the trial, lawyers for the accused said that the men believed that the accounting decisions...
During the trial, lawyers for the accused said that the men believed that the accounting decisions they made were appropriate at the time, and that the accounting treatment was approved by Nortel’s auditors from Deloitte & Touche. Judge Marrocco accepted these arguments. Marrocco added he was “not satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt” that the trio (i.e., Dunn, Beatty, and Gollogly) had “deliberately misrepresented” financial results. Given the facts of the case, do you believe Judge Marrocco’s decision was justified? Explain....
What tools could AA leaders have used to increase their awareness of internal and external issues?...
What tools could AA leaders have used to increase their awareness of internal and external issues? ???ALASKA AIRLINES: NAVIGATING CHANGE In the autumn of 2007, Alaska Airlines executives adjourned at the end of a long and stressful day in the midst of a multi-day strategic planning session. Most headed outside to relax, unwind and enjoy a bonfire on the shore of Semiahmoo Spit, outside the meeting venue in Blaine, a seaport town in northwest Washington state. Meanwhile, several members of...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT