Each group is to come up with a hypothetical ethical
dilemma that an engineer may face.
First, pick a type of engineer (perhaps what your major is…). Then
figure out what sort of
work they do (perhaps a job you hope to have one day…). Finally,
invent a scenario that
could arise such that the engineer is faced with an ethical
dilemma.
Now on to the “fun” part! It is up to your group to play out the
scenario anyway you want.
For instance, in your groups eyes, the engineer could (a) make all
of the ethically correct
decisions/actions, (b) make all of the ethically wrong
decisions/actions, or (c) make a
combination of right and wrong decisions/actions.
Your group will then put together a short (~ 10 minute) powerpoint
presentation that details
your scenario. Your group does NOT need to write a paper, just a
simple presentation.
Since this is a remote class environment, your group will simply
send me the presentation.
At the end of your presentation, your group should pose 5 questions
related to the scenario.
[What I want you to do is write down what you will include in each slide for the scenario you will create. It needs to be at least 10 slides for the PowerPoint and the last slide should be 5 questions related to your scenario. !!!!!]
HEY STUDENT, I REQUEST YOU TO UPVOTE THE GIVEN ANSWER,IT WILL BE APPRECIATED.THANK YOU :)
Since time is limited,so I'll try to provide as much information as I can.Here I'm giving you 5 scenarios( 2 slides each) but the conclusion you can vary according to you whether it should be a ethically good decision or a bad decision.
(1) SCENARIO-1
Alex is is a Quality Assurance Engineer at a large and established.electronics company. whose responsibility is to final test her company’s servers.Also, She decides when new products will be shipped to distributor.
Alex’s company has a contract with a company which makes the chips for her company's server. These products release a new generation server approximately every three months, which means she has a limited timeframe to conduct her Quality tests on servers..
Due to shortage of time between the release of each next new product,She cannot perform every quality test on the servers to ensure they do not have any defect .
Ethical right/wrong decisions
(1)If Alex will not ship a product,She will have company deadline that she fails to deliver and her company's competitor will.if there is any possibility thatto the customer.
(2) If she will ship a product that has a higher likelihood of failure resulting in data loss due to the server could malfunction and cause physical harm to the customer..
(2) SCENARIO-2
Rosey is an electrical engineer in a computer hardware company. She goes through an unfavorable scenario involving a few of her co-workers becuase of favoritism the company, She encountered that
Two newly hired employees were given visible roles in a prominent project. When the project became successful the new-hires were given generous promotions by management. On the other hand, her co-workers were asked to play supporting roles iwere not given any recognition for their work. Because of rosey's experience in professional field,they told her that they were going to leave the company, if management will not stop playing favoritism the company.
Ethical right/wrong decisions
(1) If She do not take any action on the situation of this favoritism the company because of the fear of her job.
(3) SCENARIO-3
David has been working at a well- established computer hardware company for more than 10 years. In recent years, many college graduates have been hired into the company.And this year, 3 new hired graduates were introduced into his group.David used to train these hires by having technical workshop.
Altough, He feels that, instead of growing inner infrastructure, the company has spent a lot of resources in finding young and talented employees for their new products. He is not the manager but feels her, must often assume responsibility for these hires. He is unhappy as he feels that the time invested in training these new employees could be used to complete his projects.
Ethical right/wrong decisions
David wants to bring her concerns up to her manager or ethics department, but is unsure if it is necessary. What should he do?
(4) SCENARIO-4
Joe is a task engineer for a mechanical vitality innovation organization.,and has as of late been elevated to survey ventures for in-need networks abroad. He has been placed responsible for dealing with the current organization's cause extends, and deciding how to disperse the subsidizing for them.
A portion of the tasks are entirely clear in their strategic material necessity, however for one anticipate, Joe isn't sure whether the organization ought to finance it. The venture's strategic to give new sunlight based boards to Indian people group however the undertaking information proposes it is increasingly viable to simply introduce better lighting inside the homes. Jack ponders whether to raise his questions with his chief. In view of the organization's exploration on the network, the network wants better lighting framework for their homes, and the sun based boards would be a costly and high support venture. Also, there was a past venture that (when finished) brought about gear being taken from a similar area to trade for cash.
Joe comprehends their neighborhood support would increase an extraordinary preferred position in including sun powered boards in the network. It would likewise cultivate a decent business association between the two organizations.
Ethical right/wrong decisions
Joe feels it is his responsibility to give the network an increasingly basic and productive answer for their concern, without plunging into a huge venture that might prompt negative symptoms.
(5) SCENARIO-5
Stephen is recruited as a passage level programming engineer at SDX Alliance which is a huge organization that sells PCs, PC parts, and programming.His first Company was to help with composing the code for SDX Alliance's new hard circle controller. He chipped away at a comparative framework interning at a beginning up and had composed a code which incredibly upgraded the exhibition of their item.
Stephen quietly re-utilizes this equivalent code in the SDX Alliance item, and did not tell anybody that he has utilized the code from his last employment. His director is excited with the speed enhancements this code brings to the item.
Before the item is discharged, it needs to experience a four-month long quality confirmation process audit. During the audit of the item, it was discovered the code which Stephen created had been copyrighted by the startup he had recently worked for. Despite the fact that Stephen had built up the code, his past organization despite everything possessed the protected innovation rights to it.
When Stephen's manager informed the problem, Stephen admits he did not realize he had made a mistake because he was not aware with copyright laws. Stephen then goes on to explain that the start-up he used to work for is now out of business and is unsure
Ethical right/wrong decisions
if SDX Alliance would be able to get in contact with the owner of the copyright. If SDX Alliance can’t use Stephen’s code, then it will have to rewrite the entire code of the product, delaying its release by many months.
___________________________________________________________________________________
Questions
(1) Is it okay if Alex does not send the product for shipping? Give Brief explaination.
(2)How should Rosey deal with such situation?
(3)David wants to bring her concerns up to her manager or ethics department, but is unsure if it is necessary. What should he do?
(4) Is Joe's association wrong to offer advancement to the system when they needn't waste time with it?
(5) if SDX Alliance would be able to get in contact with the owner of the copyright. If SDX Alliance can’t use Stephen’s code, then it will have to rewrite the entire code of the product, delaying its release by many months.
Hope that helps :)
___________________________________________________________________________________
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.