Two insulation thickness alternatives have been proposed for a process steam line subject to severe weather conditions. One alternative must be selected. Estimated savings in heat loss and installation cost are given below:
THICKNESS |
INSTALLATION COST |
ANNUAL SAVINGS |
MAINTENANCE ONCE IN EACH 2 YEARS |
2cm |
$125000 |
$62000 |
$4800 |
5cm |
$408000 |
$125000 |
$0 |
C.) Useful lives of both alternatives are 8 years. Find the best alternative using a.) discounted payback period b.) conventional benefit cost ratio method c.) modified benefit cost ratio method. When MARR= 9% per year
IN EXCEL PLEASE!!
a) In Discounted Payback method, the PV of each year cashflow is calculated using Excel as per the following Table
Year | 2cm | PV of 2cm | Cumulative Payback | 5cm | PV of 5cm | Cumulative Payback |
A | B | C=B/1.09^A | D(n)=D(n-1)+C(n) | E | F=E/1.09^A | G(n)=G(n-1)+F(n) |
0 | -125000.00 | -125000.00 | -125000.00 | -408000.00 | -408000.00 | -408000.00 |
1 | 62000.00 | 56880.73 | -68119.27 | 125000.00 | 114678.90 | -293321.10 |
2 | 57200.00 | 48144.10 | -19975.17 | 125000.00 | 105210.00 | -188111.10 |
3 | 62000.00 | 47875.38 | 27900.21 | 125000.00 | 96522.94 | -91588.17 |
4 | 57200.00 | 40521.92 | 68422.13 | 125000.00 | 88553.15 | -3035.02 |
5 | 62000.00 | 40295.75 | 108717.87 | 125000.00 | 81241.42 | 78206.41 |
6 | 57200.00 | 34106.49 | 142824.36 | 125000.00 | 74533.42 | 152739.82 |
7 | 62000.00 | 33916.12 | 176740.49 | 125000.00 | 68379.28 | 221119.10 |
8 | 57200.00 | 28706.75 | 205447.24 | 125000.00 | 62733.28 | 283852.39 |
Here n = Row Number.
For the 2cm thickness, the cumulative payback becomes positive from negative in year 3.
So Discounted Payback Period = 2+ 19975.17/47875.38 = 2.417years
For the 5cm Thickness, the cumulative Payback becomes positive from negative in year 5.
So discounted Payback Period = 4 + 3035.02/81241.42 = 4.037 years
Since the discounted payback period of the 2cm thickness insulation is lower, it makes sense to go ahead with that.
b) In B/C ratio, the tables can be made as follows
2cm | 5cm | |||||||
Year | Benefits | Costs | PV of Benefits | PV of Costs | Benefits | Costs | PV of Benefits | PV of Costs |
A | B | C | D=B/1.09^A | E=C/1.09^A | F | G | H=F/1.09^A | I=G/1.09^A |
0 | 125000.00 | 0.00 | 125000.00 | 0.00 | 408000.00 | 0.00 | 408000.00 | |
1 | 62000.00 | 56880.73 | 0.00 | 125000.00 | 114678.90 | 0.00 | ||
2 | 62000.00 | 4800.00 | 52184.16 | 4040.06 | 125000.00 | 105210.00 | 0.00 | |
3 | 62000.00 | 47875.38 | 0.00 | 125000.00 | 96522.94 | 0.00 | ||
4 | 62000.00 | 4800.00 | 43922.36 | 3400.44 | 125000.00 | 88553.15 | 0.00 | |
5 | 62000.00 | 40295.75 | 0.00 | 125000.00 | 81241.42 | 0.00 | ||
6 | 62000.00 | 4800.00 | 36968.57 | 2862.08 | 125000.00 | 74533.42 | 0.00 | |
7 | 62000.00 | 33916.12 | 0.00 | 125000.00 | 68379.28 | 0.00 | ||
8 | 62000.00 | 4800.00 | 31115.71 | 2408.96 | 125000.00 | 62733.28 | 0.00 | |
Total | 343158.79 | 137711.55 | 691852.39 | 408000.00 |
B/C Ratio of 2cm Thickness = 343158.79/137711.55 = 2.49
B/C Ratio of 5cm Thickness = 691852.39/408000 = 1.70
Since the B/C Ratio is higher for 2cm thickness insulation, that should be used.
c) In case of Modified B/C Ratio, the tables are again calculated as follows
2cm | 5cm | |||||||||||
Year | Benefits | Recurring Costs | Installation Cost | PV of Benefits | PV of Costs | PV of Installation Costs | Benefits | Recurring Costs | Installation Cost | PV of Benefits | PV of Costs | PV of Installation Costs |
A | B | C | D | E=B/1.09^A | F=C/1.09^A | G=D/1.09^A | H | I | J | K=H/1.09^A | L=I/1.09^A | M=J/1.09^A |
0 | 125000.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 125000.00 | 0.00 | 408000.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 408000.00 | |||
1 | 62000.00 | 56880.73 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 125000.00 | 114678.90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
2 | 62000.00 | 4800.00 | 52184.16 | 4040.06 | 0.00 | 125000.00 | 105210.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
3 | 62000.00 | 47875.38 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 125000.00 | 96522.94 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
4 | 62000.00 | 4800.00 | 43922.36 | 3400.44 | 0.00 | 125000.00 | 88553.15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
5 | 62000.00 | 40295.75 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 125000.00 | 81241.42 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
6 | 62000.00 | 4800.00 | 36968.57 | 2862.08 | 0.00 | 125000.00 | 74533.42 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
7 | 62000.00 | 33916.12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 125000.00 | 68379.28 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
8 | 62000.00 | 4800.00 | 31115.71 | 2408.96 | 0.00 | 125000.00 | 62733.28 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
Total | 343158.79 | 12711.55 | 125000.00 | 691852.39 | 0.00 | 408000.00 |
For 2cm Thickness, Modified B/C Ratio = (343158 - 12711.55) / 125000 = 2.64
For 5cm thickness, Modified B/C Ratio = (691852.39-0)/408000 = 1.70
Since the Modified B/C Ratio of 2cm thickness is higher than 5cm thickness, so it is advisable to go ahead with 2cm insulation.
The screenshots of the tables are given below
For discounted Payback Method
For B/C Ratio Method
For Modified B/C Ratio Method
If you found this helpful, please rate it so that I can have higher earnings at no extra cost to you. This will motivate me to write more.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.