Question

Two insulation thickness alternatives have been proposed for a process steam line subject to severe weather...

Two insulation thickness alternatives have been proposed for a process steam line subject to severe weather conditions. One alternative must be selected. Estimated savings in heat loss and installation cost are given below:

THICKNESS

INSTALLATION COST

ANNUAL SAVINGS

MAINTENANCE ONCE IN EACH 2 YEARS

2cm

$125000

$62000

$4800

5cm

$408000

$125000

$0

C.) Useful lives of both alternatives are 8 years. Find the best alternative using a.) discounted payback period b.) conventional benefit cost ratio method c.) modified benefit cost ratio method. When MARR= 9% per year

IN EXCEL PLEASE!!

Homework Answers

Answer #1

a) In Discounted Payback method, the PV of each year cashflow is calculated using Excel as per the following Table

Year 2cm PV of 2cm Cumulative Payback 5cm PV of 5cm Cumulative Payback
A B C=B/1.09^A D(n)=D(n-1)+C(n) E F=E/1.09^A G(n)=G(n-1)+F(n)
0 -125000.00 -125000.00 -125000.00 -408000.00 -408000.00 -408000.00
1 62000.00 56880.73 -68119.27 125000.00 114678.90 -293321.10
2 57200.00 48144.10 -19975.17 125000.00 105210.00 -188111.10
3 62000.00 47875.38 27900.21 125000.00 96522.94 -91588.17
4 57200.00 40521.92 68422.13 125000.00 88553.15 -3035.02
5 62000.00 40295.75 108717.87 125000.00 81241.42 78206.41
6 57200.00 34106.49 142824.36 125000.00 74533.42 152739.82
7 62000.00 33916.12 176740.49 125000.00 68379.28 221119.10
8 57200.00 28706.75 205447.24 125000.00 62733.28 283852.39

Here n = Row Number.

For the 2cm thickness, the cumulative payback becomes positive from negative in year 3.

So Discounted Payback Period = 2+ 19975.17/47875.38 = 2.417years

For the 5cm Thickness, the cumulative Payback becomes positive from negative in year 5.

So discounted Payback Period = 4 + 3035.02/81241.42 = 4.037 years

Since the discounted payback period of the 2cm thickness insulation is lower, it makes sense to go ahead with that.

b) In B/C ratio, the tables can be made as follows

2cm 5cm
Year Benefits Costs PV of Benefits PV of Costs Benefits Costs PV of Benefits PV of Costs
A B C D=B/1.09^A E=C/1.09^A F G H=F/1.09^A I=G/1.09^A
0 125000.00 0.00 125000.00 0.00 408000.00 0.00 408000.00
1 62000.00 56880.73 0.00 125000.00 114678.90 0.00
2 62000.00 4800.00 52184.16 4040.06 125000.00 105210.00 0.00
3 62000.00 47875.38 0.00 125000.00 96522.94 0.00
4 62000.00 4800.00 43922.36 3400.44 125000.00 88553.15 0.00
5 62000.00 40295.75 0.00 125000.00 81241.42 0.00
6 62000.00 4800.00 36968.57 2862.08 125000.00 74533.42 0.00
7 62000.00 33916.12 0.00 125000.00 68379.28 0.00
8 62000.00 4800.00 31115.71 2408.96 125000.00 62733.28 0.00
Total 343158.79 137711.55 691852.39 408000.00

B/C Ratio of 2cm Thickness = 343158.79/137711.55 = 2.49

B/C Ratio of 5cm Thickness = 691852.39/408000 = 1.70

Since the B/C Ratio is higher for 2cm thickness insulation, that should be used.

c) In case of Modified B/C Ratio, the tables are again calculated as follows

2cm 5cm
Year Benefits Recurring Costs Installation Cost PV of Benefits PV of Costs PV of Installation Costs Benefits Recurring Costs Installation Cost PV of Benefits PV of Costs PV of Installation Costs
A B C D E=B/1.09^A F=C/1.09^A G=D/1.09^A H I J K=H/1.09^A L=I/1.09^A M=J/1.09^A
0 125000.00 0.00 0.00 125000.00 0.00 408000.00 0.00 0.00 408000.00
1 62000.00 56880.73 0.00 0.00 125000.00 114678.90 0.00 0.00
2 62000.00 4800.00 52184.16 4040.06 0.00 125000.00 105210.00 0.00 0.00
3 62000.00 47875.38 0.00 0.00 125000.00 96522.94 0.00 0.00
4 62000.00 4800.00 43922.36 3400.44 0.00 125000.00 88553.15 0.00 0.00
5 62000.00 40295.75 0.00 0.00 125000.00 81241.42 0.00 0.00
6 62000.00 4800.00 36968.57 2862.08 0.00 125000.00 74533.42 0.00 0.00
7 62000.00 33916.12 0.00 0.00 125000.00 68379.28 0.00 0.00
8 62000.00 4800.00 31115.71 2408.96 0.00 125000.00 62733.28 0.00 0.00
Total 343158.79 12711.55 125000.00 691852.39 0.00 408000.00

For 2cm Thickness, Modified B/C Ratio = (343158 - 12711.55) / 125000 = 2.64

For 5cm thickness, Modified B/C Ratio = (691852.39-0)/408000 = 1.70

Since the Modified B/C Ratio of 2cm thickness is higher than 5cm thickness, so it is advisable to go ahead with 2cm insulation.

The screenshots of the tables are given below

For discounted Payback Method

For B/C Ratio Method

For Modified B/C Ratio Method

If you found this helpful, please rate it so that I can have higher earnings at no extra cost to you. This will motivate me to write more.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions