DISCUSSION POST: Read Babe Ruth and Comparative Advantage [PDF] and post to the Chapter 3 Discussion about this material. Then pick another person who excelled in more than one activity. Clease try to avoid picking those who fit neatly into this category. The most obvious are sports figures like Bo Jackson and Deion Sanders who played two sports at the highest level (and also Michael Jordan who also tried this, with little success in his second sport). Avoid these people and other similar prominent figures--try to be a little imaginative about your selection. Make sure to explain how your person embodies the economic concepts that you are trying to understand. Consider the person's decisions about specialization and how that choice affected them. The posting should include a link to a description of this person and their accomplishments.
The article:
Babe Ruth—Absolute Advantage and Comparative Advantage
Although we remember Babe Ruth as one of the greatest power hitters
in the history of baseball, Ruth started his career as a pitcher
for the Boston Red Sox. In his first year, 1914, he played in only
a few games. The next year, he joined the team’s regular rotation
of starting pitchers. By 1916 he had become a dominant pitcher: he
led the American League in both earned run average and shutouts and
finished third in both strikeouts and wins. Noted baseball writer
Robert Creamer called Ruth the best pitcher that year—and at time
the American League included Walter (Big Train) Johnson, a player
many experts believe to have been the greatest pitcher of all
time.
Ruth continued to pitch successfully for the Red Sox in the years
that followed; he led the team to World Series wins in 1915, 1916
and 1918. In the 1918 World Series Ruth extended his string of
consecutive scoreless innings pitched to twenty-nine, a record that
would stand for over forty years. The latter year was the last time
that Boston won the World Series until 2004; a streak that became
infamously known as the curse of the “Bambino,” (one of Ruth’s
nicknames). But he was also beginning to exhibit his strengths as a
hitter. It may not sound all that impressive these days, but Ruth
hit 11 home runs in 1918; for comparison, none of his teammates hit
more than one that year—and remember, the Red Sox won the World
Series that year. It’s also useful to note that this was during the
period known as the “dead ball era.” So while, Ruth was an
impressive pitcher, his talents as a hitter were even more
incredible. Despite this, the Red Sox sold Ruth’s contract to the
New York Yankees just prior to the start of the 1920 season.
Of course, it’s Ruth’s career with the Yankees that has made him an
immortal, and it’s no exaggeration that Yankee Stadium was truly
the “House that Ruth built.” Fans showed up to see Ruth hit, not
pitch and this strategy worked extraordinarily well for the
Yankees; the New York team won 7 American League pennants and 4
Worlds Series championships between 1920 and 1932. Ruth’s exploits
are now legend—hiting over 50 home runs twice and then 60 in 1927,
and this number was not bettered until 1961. His career home run
total of 714 stood for over 50 years.
From an economics standpoint, the question is what Ruth’s
comparative advantage was. He clearly had an absolute advantage
over his Red Sox teammates in both hitting and pitching, the same
probably may well have been the case had he pitched regularly for
the Yankees—but he never really had a chance to prove this, because
he was used almost exclusively as a hitter.
So, why did Ruth—or the Yankees—choose to specialize? It comes down
to their evaluation of his abilities and his comparative advantage
as a hitter. But baseball fans are left with an interesting
question: would the Yankees have been a better team with Ruth as a
starting pitcher than as an outfielder?
Absolute advantage:
Ruth an absolute advantage over the competition,Ruth was the best pittcher in the league year(1974),and also best hitter with good batting average.
compartive advantage :
Ruth had compartive advantage as hitter during the period,if the record of the third or fourth best pitcher had mediocre so could specilize in hitting on compartive,the Sox and soon after,the Yankees.the Yankees record between 1920 to 1924 on win ratio .646 but the same period of time Ruth win ratio was .777,like that Ruth had compartive advantage.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.