In the long-run a restaurateur with high set-up costs (e.g. $2,000,000 physical capital costs) would most likely:
Select one:
a. Have to be confident that her turnover would be sufficiently high to lower her marginal costs in the long-run.
b. Have to be confident that her marginal costs were below her average variable costs in the long-run.
c. Have to be confident that her marginal costs were going to decrease in the long-run.
d. Have to be confident that her sales would be at least at the minimum efficient level of production in the long-run.
Q |
TC ($) |
11 |
635 |
12 |
650 |
13 |
670 |
14 |
700 |
15 |
750 |
16 |
800 |
17 |
850 |
18 |
915 |
19 |
1,000 |
20 |
1,110 |
Based on the cost table above, the firm is operating with diseconomies of scale over which of the following output ranges:
Select one:
a. 11 to 14.
b. 16 to 20.
c. 14 to 17.
d. 18 to 20.
Q |
TC ($) |
300 |
2,000 |
320 |
2,100 |
340 |
2,210 |
360 |
2,300 |
380 |
2,385 |
400 |
2,465 |
420 |
2,535 |
440 |
2,605 |
460 |
2,670 |
480 |
2,730 |
Based on the long-run cost table above, the firm is experiencing diseconomies of scale over which of the following output ranges:
Select one:
a. The firm does not experience diseconomies of scale over any output range.
b. 380 to 420.
c. 300 to 360.
d. 440 to 480.
Quantity |
Long-Run Total Cost |
200 |
$ 80,000 |
300 |
$110,000 |
400 |
$140,000 |
500 |
$150,000 |
600 |
$180,000 |
700 |
$210,000 |
800 |
$260,000 |
900 |
$300,000 |
1000 |
$340,000 |
Based on the table above, can one determine if the restaurant experiences constant returns to scale, and if so, over what output range:
Select one:
a. Yes, constant returns to scale over the 500 – 700 range of output.
b. Yes, constant returns to scale over the 400 – 600 range of output.
c. Yes, there are no constant returns to scale.
d. Yes, constant returns to scale over the 500 – 800 range of output.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.