Question

A policy has been implemented to control pollution from two firms. The marginal cost of abatement...

A policy has been implemented to control pollution from two firms. The marginal cost of abatement for firm 1 is $5/ton at its choice of emissions. The marginal cost of abatement for firm 2 is $3/ton at its choice of emissions.

What is true about this policy?

This policy is optimal

This policy is inefficient because both firms should increase their abatement

The policy is inefficient because firm 1 should increase its abatement and firm 2 should decrease its abatement

The policy is inefficient because firm 1 should decrease its abatement and firm 2 should increase its abatement

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Answer- Correct option is 'D'

''The policy is inefficient because firm 1 should decrease its abatement and firm 2 should increase its abatement'', this statement is True. Because the direct pollution control are usually inefficient because by mandating the same response from all agent but the different marginal cost of pollution abatement of two firms. If one firm has a lowered abatement cost than another firm, it pays to reallocate a given amount of abatement. To minimize the total cost of any given amount of pollution abatement the lower-cost firm should abate more and the higher-cost firm less. The general conclusion is that efficient abatement requires that each firm have the same marginal cost of the last unit of abatement undertaken.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Two polluting firms can control emissions of a pollutant by incurring the following marginal abatement costs:...
Two polluting firms can control emissions of a pollutant by incurring the following marginal abatement costs: MAC1 = $300?1, and MAC2 = $100?2 where ?1, and ?2 are the amount of emissions abated (i.e., pollution controlled) by firm 1 and firm 2 respectively. Assume that with no abatement of emissions at all, firm 1 would release 15 units of pollution and firm 2 would release 10 units, for a total of 25 units. Assume the target level of abatement is...
Two firms can control emissions at the following marginal abatement costs. ?? 1= 200?1 and ??.2...
Two firms can control emissions at the following marginal abatement costs. ?? 1= 200?1 and ??.2 = 100?1, where q1 and q2 are, respectively the amount of emissions abated for firm 1 and firm 2. Assume that with no control at all each firm would be abating 20 units of emissions or a total of 40 units for both firms. a) Calculate the marginal cost for abating 20 units of emissions for each firm. b) Calculate the cost-effective allocation of...
Consider two polluting firms. The marginal cost of abatement for firm 1 is MC1 = e1...
Consider two polluting firms. The marginal cost of abatement for firm 1 is MC1 = e1 + 300, and the marginal cost of abatement for firm 2 is MC2 = 3e2, where e1 and e2 are the tons of pollution abatement by firms 1 and 2, respectively. Baseline pollution levels are bl1 = 2000 and bl2 = 2000. Suppose the government sets a pollution reduction goal of 1600 total units of abatement. Write down two equations that ensure that the...
Suppose a control authority is trying to design a cost-effective pollution control policy. They assume the...
Suppose a control authority is trying to design a cost-effective pollution control policy. They assume the aggregate marginal abatement cost is given as MAC = 16 –q and the marginal pollution damage is given as MD = 3q where q is the total amount of emissions. Calculate the socially efficient level of emissions. Use a diagram to explain why the profit-maximising level of emissions and socially efficient level of emissions are different. Suppose the control authority tries to achieve the...
Suppose that there are two firms (1 and 2) with marginal abatement cost (MAC) curves as...
Suppose that there are two firms (1 and 2) with marginal abatement cost (MAC) curves as follows: MAC1 = 160 − 4E1 MAC2 = 100 − E2 (E1 and E2 represent the respective amounts of emissions in litres.) a-)What are the marginal abatement cost curves of these two firms as a function of their abatement? b-)What would the industry-wide emissions be after 40 litres of abatement? c-)Calculate the industry total cost of abatement if each firm abates 20 litres. d-)Derive...
marginal abatement cost curves for polluters 1 and 2 : MAC1=10-e1 and MAC2=8-e1. * How much...
marginal abatement cost curves for polluters 1 and 2 : MAC1=10-e1 and MAC2=8-e1. * How much does polluter 1 and polluter 2 pollute without government intervention? * This level of pollution should be reduced by 50%. What are the marginal and total abatement costs of polluters 1 and 2 if a command and control policy is applied? * What is the optimal outcome, or which allocation of emissions minimize the abatement costs? Please calculate the total abatement costs for the...
4. Consider an industry with three firms. Firm 1’s marginal cost of abatement (MCA)=20-2E1, where E...
4. Consider an industry with three firms. Firm 1’s marginal cost of abatement (MCA)=20-2E1, where E is the tons of pollution emitted. Firm 2’s MCA=10-E2. Firm 3’s MCA=40-2E3. Please draw a diagram to support your answers to the following questions. If there is no policy to reduce pollution, how much pollution will be emitted by each firm? What will be total pollution? If the government imposes a tax of $10/ton, how much pollution will be emitted by each firm? What...
Assume the following marginal abatement cost curves for polluters 1 and 2 : MAC1=10-e1 and MAC2=8-e1....
Assume the following marginal abatement cost curves for polluters 1 and 2 : MAC1=10-e1 and MAC2=8-e1. 1. How much does polluter 1 and polluter 2 pollute without government intervention? 2. This level of pollution should be reduced by 50%. What are the marginal and total abatement costs of polluters 1 and 2 if a command and control policy is applied? 3. What is the optimal outcome, or which allocation of emissions minimize the abatement costs? Please calculate the total abatement...
Emissions (tons/month) Marginal Abatement Cost Total Abatement Cost Total Subsidy at $150/ton Total tax bill at...
Emissions (tons/month) Marginal Abatement Cost Total Abatement Cost Total Subsidy at $150/ton Total tax bill at $150/ton Total Costs 10 0 0 9 15 15 8 30 45 7 50 95 6 70 165 5 95 260 4 120 380 3 150 530 2 185 715 1 230 945 0 290 1,235 50. What optimal level of emissions would the above firm choose given the subsidy level detailed above? 51. If the above firm emits the optimal level of emissions...
Two polluting firms emit 200 tons of SO2 each, with Marginal Abatement Costs given by MAC1=...
Two polluting firms emit 200 tons of SO2 each, with Marginal Abatement Costs given by MAC1= 2X1 and MAC2= 3X2, respectively. Xi represents the level of abatement for each firm i, in tons. The government wants to reduce total SO2 emissions by 30% and decides to impose a uniform cap on emissions, with each firm receiving 140 allowances for free (firms don’t pay for allowance). a) In a first moment assume polluters are not allowed to trade, so each firm...