Question

1. There are important trade-offs involved in granting "Wild and Scenic River Status" to portions of...

1. There are important trade-offs involved in granting "Wild and Scenic River Status" to portions of a river. The critical issue is how much of this public good, a free-flowing river, should be protected from further development. As an analyst in the Office of Policy Analysis of the U.S. Department of the Interior, you are called upon to make a recommendation, based upon the following information. Each year, 1000 people benefit from the River's various services, exclusively for recreational purposes. A contingent valuation survey carried out by your office has estimated that each beneficiary has the same demand function for river preservation, Q = 40 - 0.4P where P is the price-per-mile which persons are willing to pay (per year) for Q miles of river preserved. You find that the marginal (opportunity) cost of preservation is $25,000 per mile per year. [Hint: You need to derive the market (aggregate) demand curve for a public good.]

e) What is the magnitude of the total (gross) annual benefits associated with this (efficient allocation) policy?

f) What is the magnitude of the total (gross) annual costs associated with this (efficient allocation) policy?

g) What is the magnitude of the net annual benefits associated with this (efficient allocation) policy?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

The demand function of the river's preservation for each beneficiary is

Q=40-0.4P

The demand function remains the same for all the beneficiaries and there are 1000 people. Thus, the aggregate demand function of the public good is given as

1000Q=40,000-400P

Since P is the price-per-mile which persons are willing to pay (per year) for Q miles of river preserved, the total (gross) annual benefits associated with this efficient allocation policy is $1000PQ = $1000(40P-0.4P2).

The marginal (opportunity) cost of preservation is $25,000 per mile per year. Hence, the total (gross) annual costs associated with this (efficient allocation) policy is $(25,000*1000Q)=$25,000,000(40-0.4P).

The net annual benefits associated with this (efficient allocation) policy is $[1000(40P-0.4P2)-25,000,000(40-0.4P)]

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
step by step solution for the below question please Flag this Question Question 11 pts What...
step by step solution for the below question please Flag this Question Question 11 pts What is the difference between positive economics and normative economics? Group of answer choices Positive economics deals with dynamic systems, while normative economics focuses on static systems. Normative economics deals with how the world actually works, whereas positive economics focuses on what people ought to do. Positive economics requires making value judgments, while normative economics relies solely on factual statements. Normative economics applies in cases...
2. SECURING THE WORKFORCE Diversity management in X-tech, a Japanese organisation This case is intended to...
2. SECURING THE WORKFORCE Diversity management in X-tech, a Japanese organisation This case is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion rather than as an illustration of the effective or ineffective handling of an administrative situation. The name of the company is disguised. INTRODUCTION In light of demographic concerns, in 2012, the Japanese government initiated an effort to change the work environment in order to secure the workforce of the future. Japan is world renowned for its...
3 SECURING THE WORKFORCE Diversity management in X-tech, a Japanese organisation This case is intended to...
3 SECURING THE WORKFORCE Diversity management in X-tech, a Japanese organisation This case is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion rather than as an illustration of the effective or ineffective handling of an administrative situation. The name of the company is disguised. INTRODUCTION In light of demographic concerns, in 2012, the Japanese government initiated an effort to change the work environment in order to secure the workforce of the future. Japan is world renowned for its...
Using the model proposed by Lafley and Charan, analyze how Apigee was able to drive innovation....
Using the model proposed by Lafley and Charan, analyze how Apigee was able to drive innovation. case:    W17400 APIGEE: PEOPLE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND THE CHALLENGE OF GROWTH Ranjeet Nambudiri, S. Ramnarayan, and Catherine Xavier wrote this case solely to provide material for class discussion. The authors do not intend to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a managerial situation. The authors may have disguised certain names and other identifying information to protect confidentiality. This publication may not be...
What tools could AA leaders have used to increase their awareness of internal and external issues?...
What tools could AA leaders have used to increase their awareness of internal and external issues? ???ALASKA AIRLINES: NAVIGATING CHANGE In the autumn of 2007, Alaska Airlines executives adjourned at the end of a long and stressful day in the midst of a multi-day strategic planning session. Most headed outside to relax, unwind and enjoy a bonfire on the shore of Semiahmoo Spit, outside the meeting venue in Blaine, a seaport town in northwest Washington state. Meanwhile, several members of...