Question

Mike and Jake are basketball players who sometimes flop (that is, intentionally fall or feign an...

Mike and Jake are basketball players who sometimes flop (that is, intentionally fall or feign an injury in order to cause a foul on another player). It is better for each of them if both play fairly and don't flop then when both flop. But each player is better off flopping than not flopping. Their payoffs are given below.

Jake

Mike

Flop

Not Flop

Flop

(3, 3)

(4, 1)

Not Flop

(1, 4)

(1, 1)

For instance, if Mike flops but Jake doesn't flop, Mike gets a payoff of 4 and Jake gets a payoff of 1.

Question 11 (0.5 points)

This game is an example of

Question 11 options:

A sequential game.

A simultaneous game.

A game in pure strategies.

A game in mixed strategies.

Question 12 (0.5 points)

What is Mike's best response if Jake flops?

Question 12 options:

Flop.

Don't flop.

He is indifferent between flopping and not flopping.

There is not enough information to determine his best response.

Question 13 (0.5 points)

What is Mike's best response if Jake doesn't flop?

Question 13 options:

Flop.

Don't flop.

He is indifferent between flopping and not flopping.

There is not enough information to determine his best response.

Question 14 (0.5 points)

What is Mike's dominant strategy?

Question 14 options:

Mike doesn't have a dominant strategy.

Flop.

Don't flop.

There is not enough information to determine his dominant strategy.  

Question 15 (1 point)

What is the pure strategy Nash equilibrium of this game?

Question 15 options:

Both players flop.

Neither player flops.

Mike flops but Jake doesn't.

Jake flops but Mike doesn't.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Answer 11. A Simultaneous game

reason- A Simultaneous move game is depicted in normal /table form where both players can choose their strategies simultaneously.

Answer 12. Flop

reason- When Jake flops, mike should also flop because 3>1.

Answer 13.

Flop

reason- When Jake doesn't flops, mike should flop because 4>1.

Answer 14.Flop

reason- Irrespective of what Jake chooses, Mike always chooses Flop. So flop is the Dominant strategy of Mike.

Answer 15. Both players flop

reason- Both players have a dominant strategy to choose Flop. So the Nash Equilibrium is for both players to Flop.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Mixed Strategies Consider the following game between two players Bad-Boy and Good-Girl. Bad-Boy can either behave...
Mixed Strategies Consider the following game between two players Bad-Boy and Good-Girl. Bad-Boy can either behave or misbehave whereas Good-Girl can either punish or reward. Below payoff matrix shows the game as pure strategies. Good Girl Reward Punish Bad Boy Behave 5, 5 -5,-5 Misbehave 10,-10 -10,-5 Question 41 (1 point) What is the Nash equilibrium of the game in pure strategies? Question 41 options: Behave-Reward Behave-Punish Misbehave-Punish There is no Nash equilibrium in pure strategies. Question 42 (1 point)...
(4) In this game, each of two players can volunteer some of their spare time planting...
(4) In this game, each of two players can volunteer some of their spare time planting and cleaning up the community garden. They both like a nicer garden and the garden is nicer if they volunteer more time to work on it. However, each would rather that the other person do the volunteering. Suppose that each player can volunteer 0, 1, 2, 3, or4 hours. If player 1 volunteers x hours and 2 volunteers y hours, then the resultant garden...
Question 1 Which of the followings is correct according to what you learn in chapter Oligopoly?...
Question 1 Which of the followings is correct according to what you learn in chapter Oligopoly? options: a. Monopoly output is higher than the market output in an oligopoly market. b. Monopoly profit is higher than the total profit in an oligopoly market. c. Monopoly price is lower than the price in an oligopoly market. d. Monopoly outcome is more socially efficient than the outcome in an oligopoly market. Question 2 In a Nash equilibrium: options: a. The joint payoff...
Mr. T. is the front-runner in a political race. Mr. R and Mr. C are two...
Mr. T. is the front-runner in a political race. Mr. R and Mr. C are two other rival candidates, and will simultaneously decide on their strategies for the upcoming debate. In this question, consider this interaction as a one-shot (ie., not repeated), and completely ignore the third player, Mr. T. Mr. R is more popularly known than Mr. C, so every time he insults Mr. T, he receives a large bump in polls if Mr. C chooses not to insult....
James and William, two equally talented athletes, expect to compete in the upcoming world championship in...
James and William, two equally talented athletes, expect to compete in the upcoming world championship in the 400-meter hurdles. Each of them is trying to decide how many hours to train each week for the first race. We will use the Tullock model to describe their behavior. For each athlete, winning is worth 90 hours per week, so we measure the prize as 90 hours. The cost of an hour of effort is, of course, an hour. Suppose that James...
Please answer the following Case analysis questions 1-How is New Balance performing compared to its primary...
Please answer the following Case analysis questions 1-How is New Balance performing compared to its primary rivals? How will the acquisition of Reebok by Adidas impact the structure of the athletic shoe industry? Is this likely to be favorable or unfavorable for New Balance? 2- What issues does New Balance management need to address? 3-What recommendations would you make to New Balance Management? What does New Balance need to do to continue to be successful? Should management continue to invest...
Sign In INNOVATION Deep Change: How Operational Innovation Can Transform Your Company by Michael Hammer From...
Sign In INNOVATION Deep Change: How Operational Innovation Can Transform Your Company by Michael Hammer From the April 2004 Issue Save Share 8.95 In 1991, Progressive Insurance, an automobile insurer based in Mayfield Village, Ohio, had approximately $1.3 billion in sales. By 2002, that figure had grown to $9.5 billion. What fashionable strategies did Progressive employ to achieve sevenfold growth in just over a decade? Was it positioned in a high-growth industry? Hardly. Auto insurance is a mature, 100-year-old industry...
Using the model proposed by Lafley and Charan, analyze how Apigee was able to drive innovation....
Using the model proposed by Lafley and Charan, analyze how Apigee was able to drive innovation. case:    W17400 APIGEE: PEOPLE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND THE CHALLENGE OF GROWTH Ranjeet Nambudiri, S. Ramnarayan, and Catherine Xavier wrote this case solely to provide material for class discussion. The authors do not intend to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a managerial situation. The authors may have disguised certain names and other identifying information to protect confidentiality. This publication may not be...
What tools could AA leaders have used to increase their awareness of internal and external issues?...
What tools could AA leaders have used to increase their awareness of internal and external issues? ???ALASKA AIRLINES: NAVIGATING CHANGE In the autumn of 2007, Alaska Airlines executives adjourned at the end of a long and stressful day in the midst of a multi-day strategic planning session. Most headed outside to relax, unwind and enjoy a bonfire on the shore of Semiahmoo Spit, outside the meeting venue in Blaine, a seaport town in northwest Washington state. Meanwhile, several members of...