Case 3: Webporn
Case Summary: Al Smetana, the CEO of Rayburn Unlimited
Company, has built the company on foundations of honesty,
integrity, and acknowledging the values that every individual at
the company possesses. One day, he realized that an employee had
found a way of accessing emails belonging to other people at the
company. He immediately asked the employee to leave the company for
violating the code of conduct.
As the employee was leaving, he made some remarks in
anger regarding the vice president of the human resources division
at the company, Mr. Craig Lindsey. The employee alleged that
Lindsey used his computer to watch pornography.
At the time, Al Smetana was skeptical about the
allegation, but later he decided to call Lindsey in his office and
make inquiries. During the meeting, Lindsey accepted the
allegations amid tears and stated that he was addicted to it and he
was trying to stop. He asked the CEO for help, but Smetana said he
needed time to think about the matter.
Discussion and application: The scenario creates a
dilemma for Al Smetana where on one hand, he does not want to lose
a friend, but on the other hand, he does not want to apply double
standards and fail to abide by his own rules.
This scenario brings out Bentham’s point on morality
as being an abstract concept that requires certain rules in order
to apply to diverse situations without changing the core values. In
this case, the rules are the presumptions that form the utilitarian
theory. Application of the theory to the situation in this case
will depend on the desired outcome as well as the company
rules.
Give a conclusion about the case. The standard would
be at least 3 to 5 sentences.
Answer this question:
How is Utilitarianism theory related to the case studies discussed?
According to the theory of utilitarianism, something is morally good if it is good for the maximum number of individuals in a society. Hence, and action should produce a balance between happiness and sufferring. For the given case study, Rayburn Unlimited Company can be considered as a representative society. If Mr Craig Lindsey is still kept in the company it will set a bad precedent for the other employees. They will believe that anything wrong can be forgiven if one is friends with the CEO. Hence, in the interest of other employees which maximizes happiness it will be good to get rid of Mr Craig Lindsey.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.