Question

Use the following to answer the questions below: Below are the marginal costs of abating pollution...

Use the following to answer the questions below:

Below are the marginal costs of abating pollution for three firms in an industry, based on their emissions levels. Each firm is now emitting 10 tons/week, so total emissions are 30 tons/week. Suppose we wish to reduce total emissions by 50 percent, to 15 tons per week in this industry.

Marginal Abatement Costs ($/ton)

Emissions (tons/week)

Firm 1

Firm 2

Firm 3

10

0

0

0

9

5

1

1

8

9

3

2

7

12

5

3

6

14

7

5

5

20

9

6

4

27

11

7

3

35

13

8

2

44

15

9

1

54

17

11

0

65

19

13

Flag this Question

Question 13 pts

How much pollution will each firm be able to release if we use the equiproportionate method of reductions (i.e. reduction split evenly)?

Firm 1:                             [ Select ]                       ["5", "10", "8", "7", "3"]      

Firm 2:                             [ Select ]                       ["5", "7", "9", "2", "4"]      

Firm 3:                             [ Select ]                       ["7", "9", "5", "8", "6", "4"]      

Question

What is the total cost of emission reductions for each firm if we use the equiproportionate reduction method (i.e. reduction split evenly)?

Firm 1:                             [ Select ]                       ["14", "176", "122", "26", "60"]      

Firm 2:                             [ Select ]                       ["49", "9", "25", "1", "16"]      

Firm 3:                             [ Select ]                       ["24", "17", "11", "41", "3"]      

How much pollution will each firm be able to release if we use the equimarginal reduction method (i.e. marginal cost across firms is equalized)?

Firm 1:                             [ Select ]                       ["3", "5", "6", "10", "8"]      

Firm 2:                             [ Select ]                       ["9", "4", "7", "2", "5"]      

Firm 3:                             [ Select ]                       ["2", "7", "4", "9", "5"]      

What is the total cost of emission reductions for each firm if we use the equimarginal reduction method (i.e. marginal cost across firms is equalized)?

Firm 1:                             [ Select ]                       ["26", "14", "87", "5", "60"]      

Firm 2:                             [ Select ]                       ["9", "1", "16", "25", "49"]      

Firm 3:                             [ Select ]                       ["24", "41", "11", "3", "17"]      

Homework Answers

Answer #1

ANSWER 1: Following equiproportionate method of reducing emissions to 15 Tons per week we will simply divide required reduction by number of firms i.e. 15/3 = 5 tons/week for each firm.

ANSWER 2: Cost for each firm will be -

FIRM 1 = $20

FIRM 2 = $9

  FIRM 3 =$6

ANSWER 3: Using equimarginal method the number of emissions that each firm would be able to emit is:

FIRM 1 = 8 TONS

FIRM 2 = 5 TONS

FIRM 3= 2 TONS

ANSWER 4: $9

According to equimarginal reduction method ( i.e. marginal cost is equal across all firms) , each firm must spend $9 for abatement of emissions.

I hope this answer helps you .plz give a thumbsup if you like the answer.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Environmental Economics The table below shows the marginal abatement costs of three firms for various levels...
Environmental Economics The table below shows the marginal abatement costs of three firms for various levels of emissions. Each firm is currently emitting 10 tons per week, so total emissions are 30 tons per week. Suppose we wish to reduce total emissions by 50 percent, to 15 tons per week. Emissions (tons/week) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Marginal abatement costs ($/ton): Firm A 0 1 2 3 6 10 14 18 23 30 38...
You can use graphs or simple algebra to answer this question; either way, be sure to...
You can use graphs or simple algebra to answer this question; either way, be sure to show all of your work and/or explain your reasoning. Two firms can reduce emissions of a pollutant at the following marginal costs: MC1 = $3 q1 MC2 = $1 q2 where q1 and q2 are, respectively, the amount of emissions reduced by the first and second firms. Total pollution-control cost functions for the two firms are Respectively: TC1 = $100 + $60 (q1)2                                                                                      TC2...
This problem set reviews the basic analytics of cost-effective pollution control. Two firms can reduce emissions...
This problem set reviews the basic analytics of cost-effective pollution control. Two firms can reduce emissions of a pollutant at the following marginal costs: MC1 = $12·q1; MC2 = $4·q2, where q1 and q2 are, respectively, the amount of emissions reduced by the first and second firms. Assume that with no control at all, each firm would be emitting 40 units of emissions (for aggregate emissions of 80 tons), and assume that there are no significant transaction costs. 1) Compute...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of reducing pollution for each firm is as follows: MC1= 3e1and MC2= 45e2, where e1and e2are the amounts (in tons) of emissions reduced by the first and second firms, respectively. Assume that in the absence of government intervention, Firm 1 generates 500 units of emissions and Firm 2 generates 500 units of emissions. Suppose Shreveport regulators decide to reduce total pollution by 400 units. If...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of reducing pollution for each firm is as follows: MC1 = 3e1 and MC2 = 45e2, where e1 and e2 are the amounts (in tons) of emissions reduced by the first and second firms, respectively. Assume that in the absence of government intervention, Firm 1 generates 500 units of emissions and Firm 2 generates 500 units of emissions. Suppose Shreveport regulators decide to reduce total...
Two polluting firms can control emissions of a pollutant by incurring the following marginal abatement costs:...
Two polluting firms can control emissions of a pollutant by incurring the following marginal abatement costs: MAC1 = $300?1, and MAC2 = $100?2 where ?1, and ?2 are the amount of emissions abated (i.e., pollution controlled) by firm 1 and firm 2 respectively. Assume that with no abatement of emissions at all, firm 1 would release 15 units of pollution and firm 2 would release 10 units, for a total of 25 units. Assume the target level of abatement is...
Two firms are ordered by the federal government to reduce their pollution levels. Firm A’s marginal...
Two firms are ordered by the federal government to reduce their pollution levels. Firm A’s marginal costs associated with pollution reduction are MCA = 20+4QA. Firm B’s marginal costs associated with pollution reduction are M CB = 10 + 8QB . The marginal benefit of pollution reduction is M B = 400 − 4(QA + QB ). (a) What is the socially optimal level of each firm’s pollution reduction? (b) Compare the social efficiency of three possible outcomes: (1) require...
Please answer E only . Below are the marginal abatement costs from two different sources. They...
Please answer E only . Below are the marginal abatement costs from two different sources. They currently emit 100 tons each. A. What would the total abatement cost be for an equiporportional cutback to a total of 100 tons? B. Suppose we issue 10 transferable permits, each entitles the firm to 10 tons of emissions. They are distributed equally to both sources. What are the final emissions each of the two sources?             C. What are the total abatement costs...
Two polluting firms emit 200 tons of SO2 each, with Marginal Abatement Costs given by MAC1=...
Two polluting firms emit 200 tons of SO2 each, with Marginal Abatement Costs given by MAC1= 2X1 and MAC2= 3X2, respectively. Xi represents the level of abatement for each firm i, in tons. The government wants to reduce total SO2 emissions by 30% and decides to impose a uniform cap on emissions, with each firm receiving 140 allowances for free (firms don’t pay for allowance). What is the market price of SO2 abatement? How many permits are traded between firms,...
tradable permits Two steel factories are currently emitting 8,000 tons of pollution each (for a total...
tradable permits Two steel factories are currently emitting 8,000 tons of pollution each (for a total of 16,000 tons). Pollution reduction (abatement) costs for Plant 1 are given by MCR1= 0.02Q and for Plant 2 by MCR2 = 0.03Q, where Q represents tons of abatement, and MCR the marginal cost of pollution reduction. A. Suppose a tradable permit system is instituted in which permits for emissions of 6,000 tons of pollution are freely issued, 3,000 permits to each plant. What...