Question

Consider the 12 logical fallacies listed in your textbook. Which fallacy applies to

each of the following statements? You do not need to explain your answer.

a) "The Bible is wrong because it's so old. We need to rely on new information."

b) "During COVID-19, it is important to trust expert sources, such as the World Health Organization and the Canada Public Health Officer."

c) "Marriage has always been between one man and one woman. Therefore, we should not engage in same-sex marriages."

d) "Christianity is stupid. If someone were born in Saudi Arabia, they'd be a Muslim, just by nature of where they're born. Religion is just a fluke."

e) "The idea that manmade climate change is disastrous must be true because it is an obvious fact."

f) "Those who are protesting against COVID-19 lockdowns are wrong because they are just stupid rednecks who do not have an education."

g) "There are only two kinds of people in this world. Those who support human rights, and those who do not."

The 12 Fallacies are

Argumentum Ad Hominem

This is when the person making the argument is attacked, instead of the argument itself. A person can be evil to the core, but his argument may still be sound.

Example: "Priya's arguments against immigration are stupid, because she is a racist!"

Argumentum Ad Populum

This is the fallacious claim that because many or most people believe a proposition to be true, it must be true.

Example: "2 billion people belive in a historical virgin birth, and therefore such a birth must be true."

Appeal to Emotion

Appealing to the emotions of people, instead of using logic and reason.

Example: Consider the following exchange between Priya and Alice, in which Alice demonstrates this fallacy:

• PRIYA: "As a country, we do not have the resources to house and provide for so many refugees. We need to take in fewer refugees than we currently are taking in."
• ALICE: "That's so insensitive! Do you even know what it's like to be a refugee? Don't you know how refugees feel?"

Straw Man Argument

Taking an opponent's argument, and rephrasing it as a weaker argument, in order to easily demolish it. A straw man, or scarecrow, can effortlessly be defeated. In attacking a straw man, an interlocutor is being unfair to his opponent.

Example: The following is a debate between TIM and JIM, on the issue of national defence:

• TIM: "The military is overextended, and we do not need to get involved in foreign, jingoistic adventures. We should cut our defence budget, and bring our troops home."
• JIM: "You want to leave our glorious nation defenceless? Are you insane?"

Red Herring

Deflecting the topic to another issue, which is unrelated to the argument at hand.

Example: Plato and Eusebius are debating politics:

• PLATO: "Senator Sandman's tax plan is fantastic. I'm going to vote for him."
• EUSEBIUS: "But Senator Sandman was a draft dodger. He's a coward. How can you vote for a coward?"

The Genetic Fallacy

Attacking a person, practice, or object based on its origins, which are irrelevant to its present-day meaning.

Example: "You're a Christian, right? Then why are you celebrating Christmas? Don't you know that Christmas comes from a pagan ceremony?"

Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc

The claim that since event X precedes event Y, it must be that X causes Y.

Example: "Every time I wear my special jersey, the Leafs win the hockey game. My jersey must cause them to win."

Argument From Authority/Experts

The assertion that because an authority figure, or figures, claims something to be true, it must be true. Instead of tackling the argument directly, the lazy person appeals to scientists, lawyers, experts, etc.5

Example: "There is a scientific consensus that anthropogenic global warming is real. Therefore, it must be real."

Begging The Question

When the conclusion is assumed, or hidden, in one of the premises.

Example: "Murder is wrong, because murdering people is immoral."

Appeal to Novelty

The claim that what is new or modern is superior to that which is old.

Example: "We are living in the modern age, and thus continue to progress morally and in terms of human rights."

Appeal to Tradition

The claim that what is traditional, or old, is superior to that which is new or modern.

Example: "Chattel slavery has been practiced for thousands of years, so we should continue to do it."

False Dilemma

When only two choices are presented, even though more than two exist.

Example: "Either you are for me, or you are against me."

Answer 1

Answer a :-

Appeal to novelty

Press statements tries to claim that new or modern superior to which is old.

Answer b :-

Argument from Authority/Experts

This statement claims that because a statement is made on the behalf of some authority or expert , the statement tshould be considered as true.

Answer c :-

Begging the question

The conclusion is hidden on one of its premises.

Answer d :-

The Genetic Fallacy

This statement is attacking a person on the basis of his origin or religion.

Answer e :-

Begging the question

The conclusion is hidden in one of its premises.

Answer f :-

Argumentum Ad Homenum

The person making the argument is attacked instead of the argument itself.

Answer g :-

False Dilemma

Only two choices are presented.