Question

You can use graphs or simple algebra to answer this question; either way, be sure to...

You can use graphs or simple algebra to answer this question; either way, be sure

to show all of your work and/or explain your reasoning.

Two firms can reduce emissions of a pollutant at the following marginal costs:

MC1 = $3 q1

MC2 = $1 q2

where q1 and q2 are, respectively, the amount of emissions reduced by the first

and second firms. Total pollution-control cost functions for the two firms are

Respectively:

TC1 = $100 + $60 (q1)2                                                                                     

TC2 = $100 + $20 (q2)2                                                                                    

Assume that with no control at all, each firm would be emitting 10 units of emissions (for aggregate emissions of 20 tons), and assume that there are no significant transaction costs.

a.         What are the total industry costs of pollution control (for both firms

combined) if a uniform emission standard is utilized to achieve an

aggregate reduction (for both firms combined) of 6 tons of emissions?

TC1 =                                                                                                                        

TC2 =                                                                                                               

TC = TC1 + TC2 =

b.         What are the marginal costs of pollution control for firm #1 and for firm

#2 under the standard considered in part a?

MC1 =

MC2 =

c.         Compute the cost-effective reduction by each of the two firms if a total

reduction of 10 tons of emissions is necessary.

Note:

(MC1 = MC2) and

(q1 + q2 = 10)

d.         What is the total industry cost of reduction (for both firms combined) for

the scenario above in part (c)?

TC1 =                                                                                                               

TC2 =

TC = TC1 + TC2

e.         What is the cost-effective reduction by the two firms with a tradable

permit approach if both firm #1 and firm #2 are freely allocated 7 tons of

emissions permits?

How will the cost-effective reduction be affected by a change in the initial allocation?

q1 =

q2 =

f.          If the authority chose to reach its objective of 6 tons of aggregate

Reduction with an emission charge, what per-unit charge should be

Imposed? How much government revenue will the tax system generate, if

the tax is levied on all units of emission?

Emissions charge = MC1 [= MC2]

Tax revenue =

g.         Which policy instrument ? taxes, tradable permits, or a uniform

standard ? would you expect private industry as a whole to prefer

(assuming the same target for aggregate emission reductions in each

case)? Why?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

(a) Here aggregate reduction is given 6 ton of emissions so we assume q1=q2=3. Then,

TC1= $100+$60(q1)2

= $100 + $60 (3)2

= $100 + $360

= $460

TC2= $100 + $20 (q2)2

= $100 + $20 (3)2

= $100 + $120

= $220

TC = TC1 + TC2

= $460 + $220

= $680

(b) MC1= $3q1

= $3(3) [ from (a) ]

= $9

MC2 = $1q2

= $1(3) [ from (a) ]

= $3

(c) Given,

MC1 = MC2 & q1+ q2 =10

Therefore, $3q1 = $1q2

Now, putting q2 = 3q1 in q1+ q2 = 10

q1+ 3q1 = 10

4q1 = 10

q1 = 2.5

So, q2 = 3q1

= 3(2.5)

= 7.5

(d) Taking value of q1= 2.5 & q2 = 7.5 from (c)

TC1 = $100 + $60(2.5)2

= $100 + $300

= $400

TC2 = $100 + $20(7.5)2

= $100 + $300

= $400

TC = TC1 + TC2

= $400 + $400

= $800

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
This problem set reviews the basic analytics of cost-effective pollution control. Two firms can reduce emissions...
This problem set reviews the basic analytics of cost-effective pollution control. Two firms can reduce emissions of a pollutant at the following marginal costs: MC1 = $12·q1; MC2 = $4·q2, where q1 and q2 are, respectively, the amount of emissions reduced by the first and second firms. Assume that with no control at all, each firm would be emitting 40 units of emissions (for aggregate emissions of 80 tons), and assume that there are no significant transaction costs. 1) Compute...
Is this statement true or false? Explain why the statement is true or false. Two firms,...
Is this statement true or false? Explain why the statement is true or false. Two firms, 1 and 2, can control their emissions of a pollutant according to the following marginal cost equations: MC1 = $1*q1 and MC2 = $1/2*q2, where q1 and q2 are the amount of emissions controlled by firm 1 and firm 2, respectively. In addition, each firm is currently emitting 100 units of pollution and neither firm is controlling its emissions. Assuming the control authority has...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of reducing pollution for each firm is as follows: MC1= 3e1and MC2= 45e2, where e1and e2are the amounts (in tons) of emissions reduced by the first and second firms, respectively. Assume that in the absence of government intervention, Firm 1 generates 500 units of emissions and Firm 2 generates 500 units of emissions. Suppose Shreveport regulators decide to reduce total pollution by 400 units. If...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of reducing pollution for each firm is as follows: MC1 = 3e1 and MC2 = 45e2, where e1 and e2 are the amounts (in tons) of emissions reduced by the first and second firms, respectively. Assume that in the absence of government intervention, Firm 1 generates 500 units of emissions and Firm 2 generates 500 units of emissions. Suppose Shreveport regulators decide to reduce total...
Suppose there are only two sources of SO2 emissions in Ohio. Source 1 is a coal...
Suppose there are only two sources of SO2 emissions in Ohio. Source 1 is a coal fired power plant and Source 2 is an oil refinery. Marginal control costs for the two firms are given by MCC1=100*q1 and MCC2=300*q2, where q1 and q2 represent the tons of pollution that each respective firm controls. Each of these two sources both currently emits 20 tons of sulfur dioxide. Ohio's government decides that it wants to reduce SO2 pollution by 20 tons total....
Use the following to answer the questions below: Below are the marginal costs of abating pollution...
Use the following to answer the questions below: Below are the marginal costs of abating pollution for three firms in an industry, based on their emissions levels. Each firm is now emitting 10 tons/week, so total emissions are 30 tons/week. Suppose we wish to reduce total emissions by 50 percent, to 15 tons per week in this industry. Marginal Abatement Costs ($/ton) Emissions (tons/week) Firm 1 Firm 2 Firm 3 10 0 0 0 9 5 1 1 8 9...
Two firms can control emissions at the following marginal abatement costs. ?? 1= 200?1 and ??.2...
Two firms can control emissions at the following marginal abatement costs. ?? 1= 200?1 and ??.2 = 100?1, where q1 and q2 are, respectively the amount of emissions abated for firm 1 and firm 2. Assume that with no control at all each firm would be abating 20 units of emissions or a total of 40 units for both firms. a) Calculate the marginal cost for abating 20 units of emissions for each firm. b) Calculate the cost-effective allocation of...
(c) The aggregate marginal cost function for this two-firm industry is: MC = 3Q Suppose the...
(c) The aggregate marginal cost function for this two-firm industry is: MC = 3Q Suppose the marginal benefit of pollution control is given by: MB = 35 − 0.5Q What is the efficient level of abatement? (d) What is the relationship between cost-effectiveness and efficiency? (e) What pollution tax would yield the efficient level of abatement you found in part (c)? If the pollution charge is levied on all units of emissions, how much revenue would the government receive? (f)...
5. Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradable permits Suppose the government wants to reduce...
5. Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradable permits Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods: Available Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government sets pollution standards using regulation. 2. The...
5. Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradable permits Suppose the government wants to reduce...
5. Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradable permits Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods: Available Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government sets pollution standards using regulation. 2. The...