You can use graphs or simple algebra to answer this question; either way, be sure
to show all of your work and/or explain your reasoning.
Two firms can reduce emissions of a pollutant at the following marginal costs:
MC1 = $3 q1
MC2 = $1 q2
where q1 and q2 are, respectively, the amount of emissions reduced by the first
and second firms. Total pollution-control cost functions for the two firms are
Respectively:
TC1 = $100 + $60 (q1)2
TC2 = $100 + $20 (q2)2
Assume that with no control at all, each firm would be emitting 10 units of emissions (for aggregate emissions of 20 tons), and assume that there are no significant transaction costs.
a. What are the total industry costs of pollution control (for both firms
combined) if a uniform emission standard is utilized to achieve an
aggregate reduction (for both firms combined) of 6 tons of emissions?
TC1 =
TC2 =
TC = TC1 + TC2 =
b. What are the marginal costs of pollution control for firm #1 and for firm
#2 under the standard considered in part a?
MC1 =
MC2 =
c. Compute the cost-effective reduction by each of the two firms if a total
reduction of 10 tons of emissions is necessary.
Note:
(MC1 = MC2) and
(q1 + q2 = 10)
d. What is the total industry cost of reduction (for both firms combined) for
the scenario above in part (c)?
TC1 =
TC2 =
TC = TC1 + TC2
e. What is the cost-effective reduction by the two firms with a tradable
permit approach if both firm #1 and firm #2 are freely allocated 7 tons of
emissions permits?
How will the cost-effective reduction be affected by a change in the initial allocation?
q1 =
q2 =
f. If the authority chose to reach its objective of 6 tons of aggregate
Reduction with an emission charge, what per-unit charge should be
Imposed? How much government revenue will the tax system generate, if
the tax is levied on all units of emission?
Emissions charge = MC1 [= MC2]
Tax revenue =
g. Which policy instrument ? taxes, tradable permits, or a uniform
standard ? would you expect private industry as a whole to prefer
(assuming the same target for aggregate emission reductions in each
case)? Why?
(a) Here aggregate reduction is given 6 ton of emissions so we assume q1=q2=3. Then,
TC1= $100+$60(q1)2
= $100 + $60 (3)2
= $100 + $360
= $460
TC2= $100 + $20 (q2)2
= $100 + $20 (3)2
= $100 + $120
= $220
TC = TC1 + TC2
= $460 + $220
= $680
(b) MC1= $3q1
= $3(3) [ from (a) ]
= $9
MC2 = $1q2
= $1(3) [ from (a) ]
= $3
(c) Given,
MC1 = MC2 & q1+ q2 =10
Therefore, $3q1 = $1q2
Now, putting q2 = 3q1 in q1+ q2 = 10
q1+ 3q1 = 10
4q1 = 10
q1 = 2.5
So, q2 = 3q1
= 3(2.5)
= 7.5
(d) Taking value of q1= 2.5 & q2 = 7.5 from (c)
TC1 = $100 + $60(2.5)2
= $100 + $300
= $400
TC2 = $100 + $20(7.5)2
= $100 + $300
= $400
TC = TC1 + TC2
= $400 + $400
= $800
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.