Question

The United States and France both enjoy wine and pasta and currently each country produces both...

The United States and France both enjoy wine and pasta and currently each country produces both goods. France can produce 10,000 pounds of pasta or 15,000 bottles of wine per month. The U.S. can produce 24,000 pounds of pasta or 18,000 bottles of wine per month.

a. Does either country have an absolute advantage at producing wine or pasta?

b. Calculate the comparative advantage for both countries for pasta and wine.

c. Explain who should specialize in producing wine and who should specialize in producing pasta.

d. If instead the U.S. could produce 100,000 pounds of pasta and 150,000 bottles of wine, should they still trade with France?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

(a)

France can produce 10,000 pounds of pasta or 15,000 bottles of wine per month.

US can produce 24,000 pounds of pasta or 18,000 bottles of wine per month.

United States can produce greater amount of both pasta and wine relative to France.

So,

United States have an absolute advantage at producing wine and pasta.

(b)

For France, the opportunity cost of producing 1 pound of pasta is (15,000/10,000) 1.5 bottles of wine and the opportunity cost of producing 1 bottle of wine is (10,000/15,000) 0.67 pounds of pasta.

For United States, the opportunity cost of producing 1 pound of pasta is (18,000/24,000) 0.75 bottles of wine and the opportunity cost of producing 1 bottle of wine is (24,000/18,000) 1.33 pounds of pasta.

France can produce wine at lower opportunity cost relative to US.

US can produce pasta at lower opportunity cost relative to France.

So,

France has comparative advantage in production of wine.

US has comparative advantage in production of pasta.

(c)

A country should specialize in production of that good in which it has comparative advantage.

So,

France should specialize in producing wine.

United States should specialize in producing pasta.

(d)

Now, United States can produce 100,000 pounds of pasta and 150,000 bottles of wine.

The opportunity cost of producing 1 pound of pasta is (150,000/100,000) 1.5 bottles of wine and the opportunity cost of producing 1 bottle of wine is (100,000/150,000) 0.67 pounds of pasta.

It can be seen that after change in production structure, the opportunity cost of producing both goods is same in both countries.

So, both countries can produce both goods in equal terms and no one has comparative advantage in production of any good.

Thus,

United States should not trade with France.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Consider two countries, A and B. Each country produces only two goods with 1,000 production units:...
Consider two countries, A and B. Each country produces only two goods with 1,000 production units: Wine and Cheese. Country A can produce 400 bottles of wine or 200 pounds of cheese or any combination of two goods. At the same time, country B can produce 1200 bottles of wine or 300 pounds of cheese or any combination of two goods. Suppose that both countries maximize their utility when they consume wine and cheese in equal proportions. 1.      a) Absolute...
France can produce 7 airplanes or 12 bottles of wine (and every linear combination in between)...
France can produce 7 airplanes or 12 bottles of wine (and every linear combination in between) per person. Similarly, the USA can produce 8 airplanes or 16 bottles of wine per person. Who has absolute advantage in each good? Who has comparative advantage in each good (if anyone)? Write your answer on paper and upload a picture
Suppose that France and Austria both produce jeans and wine. France's opportunity cost of producing a...
Suppose that France and Austria both produce jeans and wine. France's opportunity cost of producing a bottle of wine is 3 pairs of jeans while Austria's opportunity cost of producing a bottle of wine is 11 pairs of jeans. By comparing the opportunity cost of producing wine in the two countries, you can tell that has a comparative advantage in the production of wine and has a comparative advantage in the production of jeans. Suppose that France and Austria consider...
Suppose that Spain and Sweden both produce fish and wine. Spain's opportunity cost of producing a...
Suppose that Spain and Sweden both produce fish and wine. Spain's opportunity cost of producing a bottle of wine is 4 pounds of fish while Sweden's opportunity cost of producing a bottle of wine is 10 pounds of fish. By comparing the opportunity cost of producing wine in the two countries, you can tell that ( spain or sweden ) has a comparative advantage in the production of wine and ( spain or sweden ) has a comparative advantage in...
Suppose the United States can produce 10,000 books or 500 donuts while France can produce 12,000...
Suppose the United States can produce 10,000 books or 500 donuts while France can produce 12,000 books and 600 donuts. a) Which country has absolute advantage in donuts? In books? b) Which country should specialize in donuts? In books? Show your work
Assume that Canada and the United States both produce tea cakes and lumber, which are sold...
Assume that Canada and the United States both produce tea cakes and lumber, which are sold for the same price in each country. Below are the combinations of the two goods that each country can produce in one day, using the same quantities of capital and labor. Canada United States Tea Cakes (in pounds) Lumber (in tons) Tea Cakes (in pounds) Lumber (in tons) 0 60 0 50 10 45 10 40 20 30 20 30 30 15 30 20...
Assume UK and Russia produce both grapes and cloth. Output in units UK Russia Grapes 45...
Assume UK and Russia produce both grapes and cloth. Output in units UK Russia Grapes 45 65 Cloth 100 45 1) By the theory of absolute advantage which country should specialize in Grapes? Which country should specialize in clothes? Critically comment on the applicability of the theory. (1 mark) 2) Who has a comparative advantage in flowers? Who has a comparative advantage in cloth? Explain your answer by calculation of opportunity costs. (2 mark)
1. Two countries A and B both produce food and clothing. Country A can produce both...
1. Two countries A and B both produce food and clothing. Country A can produce both food and clothing using fewer resources than B. According to international trade theory A. Country A and B profitably specialize and trade with each other B. Country A and B should specialize in the good for which they each have a comparative advantage and then trade with one another C. Country B should specialize in both goods and trade with country A D. Country...
True or False? 1) If Country A is absolutely better at producing everything than Country B,...
True or False? 1) If Country A is absolutely better at producing everything than Country B, then there is no incentive for Country A to engage in trade with Country B. 2) If Tom has a comparative advantage in producing corn then he must also have an absolute advantage in producing corn. 3) If Joe can produce a good at a lower opportunity cost than Fred, then Joe must have an absolute advantage in producing this good. 4) Consider the...
Suppose there are two countries producing just two goods, soybeans and potash fertilizer. Each country has...
Suppose there are two countries producing just two goods, soybeans and potash fertilizer. Each country has the same amount of inputs (factor resources and technology). An analysis of the level of output for each product if each country was to fully specialize in producing only one good is shown below. (the data shows how much output could be produced through specialization by each country: example: for soybeans country A can produce 40 units soybeans specializing and zero potash and B...