Question

B. A regional electric utility currently relies on natural gas for power generation. It has 200...

B. A regional electric utility currently relies on natural gas for power generation. It has 200 Mw of natural gas capacity that is running on an average of 30 percent efficiency. It is studying options for supplying additional power to its customers. It has all of the following options:

Coal:   A 50 megawatt (Mw) coal plant with a capital cost of $50 million and operating costs of $5 million per year plus the cost of coal. The coal plant would operate at 33 percent efficiency for converting heat for burning coal into electricity, and can expect a 50 percent load factor (capacity factor) and will last for 30 years. Under these assumptions, there are enough local resources (the cheapest source) to supply the power plant with coal for 30 years at a cost of $2.00 per million Btu (MMBtu).

Wind: The region has two potential sites for commercial-scale wind farms. One could support 10 Mw of capacity with a 30 percent load factor. The other could support 20 Mw of capacity, but can only expect a 25 percent load factor. Both wind farms have a capital cost of $1,000 per kilowatt (kw) of installed capacity, and an annual operating and maintenance cost of $50 per year for each kw of installed capacity. The wind mills are expected to last for 20 years before needing to be replaced.

Natural gas: It could build a new 50 Mw plant for additional capacity using modern combined cycle technology that would yield 50 percent efficiency. The capital cost of the new plant would be $10 million, and the operating and maintenance costs of both new and old gas plants is $50 per kw per year, exclusive of the cost of natural gas. Both new and existing gas plants have an expected life of 30 years. The expected load factor for the natural gas plants is 30 percent. The utility has an existing contract for 30 years to purchase up to 6 trillion Btu of natural gas per year at a price of $5.00 per MMbtu. If it wants to use more the 6 trillion Btu in a year, it can purchase as much additional gas as it needs, but has to pay $9.00 per MMbtu.

1. a. Assuming that the utility has to pay an annual rate of 10 percent for investment funds, what is the levelized cost of power for each of the sources, in cents per kwh? Calculate separate costs for the two wind sites and for natural gas using the existing facilities ($0 capital cost), and using a new plant ($10 million capital cost). You may assume that the capital costs are all spent in the first year, and that operating and fuel costs are constant per year for the life of the plant. (Hint: you will need to convert all costs into common units of energy generated per unit of time -- in this case, Mwh -- and apply both the load factor and efficiency percentages to estimate electricity actually generated from total capacity, and scale up fuel costs. Note that there are 8,760 hours in a year, and 1 MMBtu=293 kwh, or 0.293 Mwh. Also, remember to separate gas costs into existing contract gas vs. new purchases.)

b. Now suppose the utility expects to pay a carbon tax of $50 per ton of CO2 emissions.. You may assume that the coal plant burns coal with an average emissions rate of 95.52 tons per MMBtu, and the average emissions rate of natural gas is 53 tons per MMBtu. How does that change the answers to part a?

2. Extra credit! If the utility minimizes average cost of power, which sources will it use and how much electricity will it generate from each source if it has a demand of:
    a. 400,000 Mwh per year?
    b. 500,000 Mwh per year?

Assume that the utility can build only one of each type of plant, and that there is no carbon tax.

(This problem is more complicated than it might seem, because the utility's power demand does not match up nicely with the capacities of the different generating plants. That means that some plant is left running at less than full capacity, which raises its effective cost per kwh. This is a real problem with electric power planning that electric utilities face all the time.)

Homework Answers

Answer #1

regional electric utility currently relies on natural gas for power generation. It has 200 Mw of natural gas capacity that is running on an average of 30 percent efficiency. It is studying options for supplying additional power to its customers. It has all of the following options:

Coal:   A 50 megawatt (Mw) coal plant with a capital cost of $50 million and operating costs of $5 million per year plus the cost of coal. The coal plant would operate at 33 percent efficiency for converting heat for burning coal into electricity, and can expect a 50 percent load factor (capacity factor) and will last for 30 years. Under these assumptions, there are enough local resources (the cheapest source) to supply the power plant with coal for 30 years at a cost of $2.00 per million Btu (MMBtu).

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Suppose an electric utility is considering whether to install a wind farm with 30 megawatts (mw)...
Suppose an electric utility is considering whether to install a wind farm with 30 megawatts (mw) of capacity or a natural gas generator that would produce the same amount of annual electricity. An engineering study showed that the site for the wind farm would produce a load factor of 25 percent. (Actual generation would be 25 percent of capacity on average over the course of a year.) The natural gas plant could be operated with a load factor of 50...
1. A regulated investor-owned electric utility currently generates 12 million Mwh per year with a total...
1. A regulated investor-owned electric utility currently generates 12 million Mwh per year with a total rate base, including transmission and distribution assets, of $10 billion. Its operating costs are $200 million annually. If the regulatory agency allows a 10 percent rate of return on the rate base, what is the regulated price of electricity, and the utility's annual earnings? 2. The utility projects its annual electricity demand to grow by an additional 7 million Mwh to 19 Mwh per...
Consider a wholesale electric power market where 1 nuclear power plant, 1 coal plant, and 2...
Consider a wholesale electric power market where 1 nuclear power plant, 1 coal plant, and 2 natural gas plants supply power. The nuclear power plant can supply 100 megawatt-hours (MWh) per hour, the coal plant can supply 80 MWh, and each natural gas plant can supply 60 MWh. The marginal cost of the nuclear power plant is equal to $10, MCN = 10. Similarly, MCC = 12 and MCG = 15. Demand fluctuates between off-peak (L) and peak (H) demand...
A coal-fired power plant can produce electricity at an operating cost of $0.06 per kilowatt-hour when...
A coal-fired power plant can produce electricity at an operating cost of $0.06 per kilowatt-hour when running at its full capacity of 30 megawatts per hour, $0.16 per kilowatt-hour when running at 20 megawatts per hour, and $0.24 per kilowatt-hour when running at 10 megawatts per hour. A gas-fired power plant can produce electricity at a variable cost of $0.12 per kilowatt-hour at any capacity from 1 megawatt per hour to its full capacity of 5 megawatts per hour. The...
Wind turbine capital investment analysis Central Plains Power Company is considering an investment in wind farm...
Wind turbine capital investment analysis Central Plains Power Company is considering an investment in wind farm technology to reduce its use of natural gas. Initial installation costs are expected to be $1,200 per kilowatt-hour of capacity. The wind turbine has a capacity of generating 2 megawatts per hour. A kilowatt-hour is 1,000 watts generated per hour and a megawatt hour is 1,000 kilowatts generated per hour. Annual operating information related to the wind turbine project was developed as follows: Wind...
In this exercise we will consider two coal-fired power plants and a solar thermal plant, in...
In this exercise we will consider two coal-fired power plants and a solar thermal plant, in order to compare their power densities, i.e., their power output vs. the amount of land they occupy. This method of comparison of diverse forms of renewable and non-renewable energy systems was pioneered by Vaclav Smil of the University of Manitoba in Canada. The first coal plant is highly efficient and is optimally located, next to a mine that supplies high-quality coal from a thick...
A particular home owner is tired of paying electric utility bills and wants to remove him/herself...
A particular home owner is tired of paying electric utility bills and wants to remove him/herself from the power grid. After reviewing the electrical bills for the past year, the home owner determines that his/her house uses 20kWh per day on average. The home owner wants to purchase a generator capable of meeting his/her electrical demands. 1. Estimate how much gasoline it would use in one 24-hour period. How much would it cost to operate per day assuming gas costs...
A natural gas pipeline currently has annual operating & maintenance costs of $40k. A new pipeline...
A natural gas pipeline currently has annual operating & maintenance costs of $40k. A new pipeline would initially cost $100k, but would reduce the annual O&M costs to $10k per year. Assuming an analysis period of 25 years, no salvage value for either pipeline, and an interest rate of 6%, what's the difference in EUAC between the existing pipeline and the new pipeline, rounded to the nearest whole dollar amount?
Suppose you own some land next to a 50 MW wind farm located on Colorado’s Front...
Suppose you own some land next to a 50 MW wind farm located on Colorado’s Front Range. Your land has a fantastic cliff/ridgeline with an elevation difference of 250 m. Evaluate whether or not you can make money by building a pumped hydroelectric energy storage system on your land that interfaces with the wind farm. Your plan is to capture excess energy from the wind farm or buy energy from the wind farm when electricity prices are low and sell...
RET Inc. currently has one product, low-priced stoves. RET Inc.  has decided to sell a new line...
RET Inc. currently has one product, low-priced stoves. RET Inc.  has decided to sell a new line of medium-priced stoves. Sales revenues for the new line of stoves are estimated at $50 million a year. Variable costs are 60% of sales.  The project is expected to last 10 years. Also, non-variable costs are $10,000,000 per year. The company has spent $4,000,000 in research and a marketing study that determined the company will lose (cannibalization) $10 million in sales a year of its...