Question
If mrt= marginal productivity of abatement expenditures and mrs= opportunity cost of abatement expenditure would a...
If
mrt= marginal productivity of abatement expenditures and mrs=
opportunity cost of abatement expenditure would a policy makers
optimal abatement choice be where mrs=mrt?
True or false
Homework Answers
Answer #1
Not the answer you're looking for?
Similar Questions
A policy has been implemented to control pollution from two firms. The marginal cost of abatement...
A policy has been implemented to control pollution from two
firms. The marginal cost of abatement for firm 1 is $5/ton at its
choice of emissions. The marginal cost of abatement for firm 2 is
$3/ton at its choice of emissions.
What is true about this policy?
This policy is optimal
This policy is inefficient because both firms should increase
their abatement
The policy is inefficient because firm 1 should increase its
abatement and firm 2 should decrease its abatement...
Suppose a society has the following marginal abatement cost (MAC) and marginal damage (MD) functions MAC...
Suppose a society has the following marginal abatement cost
(MAC) and marginal damage (MD) functions MAC = 140 – 4E MD = 3E
Where E denotes the level of pollution.
A) What is the optimal level of pollution? Sketch the MAC and MD
functions and show the optimal level of pollution in the
diagram.
marginal abatement cost curves for polluters 1 and 2 : MAC1=10-e1 and MAC2=8-e1. * How much...
marginal abatement cost curves for polluters 1 and 2 :
MAC1=10-e1 and MAC2=8-e1.
* How much does polluter 1 and polluter 2 pollute
without government intervention?
* This level of pollution should be reduced by 50%.
What are the marginal and total abatement costs of polluters 1 and
2 if a command and control policy is applied?
* What is the optimal outcome, or which allocation of
emissions minimize the abatement costs? Please calculate the total
abatement costs for the...
Emissions (tons/month) Marginal Abatement Cost Total Abatement Cost Total Subsidy at $150/ton Total tax bill at...
Emissions
(tons/month)
Marginal Abatement Cost
Total Abatement Cost
Total Subsidy at $150/ton
Total tax
bill at $150/ton
Total Costs
10
0
0
9
15
15
8
30
45
7
50
95
6
70
165
5
95
260
4
120
380
3
150
530
2
185
715
1
230
945
0
290
1,235
50. What optimal level of emissions would the above firm
choose given the subsidy level detailed above?
51. If the above firm emits the optimal level of
emissions...
Suppose a society has the following marginal abatement cost (MAC) and marginal damage (MD) functions MAC...
Suppose a society has the following marginal abatement cost
(MAC) and marginal damage (MD) functions MAC = 140 – 4E MD = 3E
Where E denotes the level of pollution.
a) What is the unregulated level of pollution?
b) What is the optimal level of pollution? Sketch the MAC and MD
functions and show the optimal level of pollution in the
diagram.
c) Find the per-unit pollution tax that would achieve the
optimal level of pollution. Show the level of...
Assume the following marginal abatement cost curves for polluters 1 and 2 : MAC1=10-e1 and MAC2=8-e1....
Assume the following marginal abatement cost curves for
polluters 1 and 2 : MAC1=10-e1 and
MAC2=8-e1.
1. How much does polluter 1 and polluter 2 pollute without
government intervention?
2. This level of pollution should be reduced by 50%. What are
the marginal and total abatement costs of polluters 1 and 2 if a
command and control policy is applied?
3. What is the optimal outcome, or which allocation of emissions
minimize the abatement costs? Please calculate the total abatement...
Suppose the marginal cost of abatement for a airborne pollutant is MC= 4X, where X is...
Suppose the marginal cost of abatement for a airborne pollutant
is MC= 4X, where X is measured in tons, and the marginal benefit of
abatement is 500 - X. The maximum abatement (reducing pollution to
zero) is XMAX= 500.
a) Graph the MC and MB curves and show the efficienct level of
abatement X* on the graph.
b) Calculate the efficient level of abatement X*
c) Suppose there is no abatement (X=0, which implies no actions
are made to remove...
Consider two polluting firms. The marginal cost of abatement for firm 1 is MC1 = e1...
Consider two polluting firms. The marginal cost of abatement
for firm 1 is MC1 =
e1 + 300, and the marginal cost of
abatement for firm 2 is MC2 =
3e2, where e1 and
e2 are the tons of pollution abatement by firms 1
and 2, respectively. Baseline pollution levels are
bl1 = 2000 and
bl2 = 2000.
Suppose the government sets a pollution reduction goal of 1600
total units of abatement.
Write down two equations that ensure that the...
4. Consider an industry with three firms. Firm 1’s marginal cost of abatement (MCA)=20-2E1, where E...
4. Consider an industry with three firms. Firm 1’s marginal cost
of abatement (MCA)=20-2E1, where E is the tons of pollution
emitted. Firm 2’s MCA=10-E2. Firm 3’s MCA=40-2E3. Please draw a
diagram to support your answers to the following questions. If
there is no policy to reduce pollution, how much pollution will be
emitted by each firm? What will be total pollution? If the
government imposes a tax of $10/ton, how much pollution will be
emitted by each firm? What...
A fishery and a Chemical Company are both operating on the river. Marginal Abatement Cost is...
A fishery and a Chemical Company are both operating on the
river.
Marginal Abatement Cost is MAC = 90 – E and Marginal Damages is
MD = 30 + 2E, where E is measured in tonnes.
19) Suppose the Chemical Company owns the river. Begin by
assuming there has not been any agreement. The Fishery offers the
Chemical Company $50 per tonne of abatement, and the Chemical
Company agrees. What will be resulting Net Social Benefit (NSB) of
the agreement?...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
Active Questions
asked 13 minutes ago
asked 26 minutes ago
asked 48 minutes ago
asked 51 minutes ago
asked 1 hour ago
asked 1 hour ago
asked 1 hour ago
asked 1 hour ago
asked 1 hour ago
asked 1 hour ago
asked 2 hours ago
asked 2 hours ago