Question

News release      In May​ 2017, real personal consumption expenditures​ (PCE) was​ $11,845 billion and the PCE...

News release

    

In May​ 2017, real personal consumption expenditures​ (PCE) was​ $11,845 billion and the PCE deflator was 112.257.

In June​ 2017, real personal consumption expenditure was​ $11,850 billion and personal consumption expenditure was​ $13,305 billion.    

​Source: BEA, July​ 31, 2017

    

Calculate personal consumption expenditure in May 2017 and the PCE deflator in June 2017.

Was the percentage increase in real personal consumption expenditure greater or smaller than that in personal consumption​ expenditure?

    

Personal consumption expenditure in May 2017 was

​$nothing

billion.

​>>> Answer with a whole number.

The PCE deflator in June 2017 was

nothing.

​>>> Answer to 1 decimal place.

The percentage change in real personal consumption expenditure between May 2017 and June 2017 was

nothing

percent.

​>>> Answer to 2 decimal places.

​>>> If your answer is​ negative, include a minus sign. If your answer is​ positive, do not include a plus sign.

The percentage change in personal consumption expenditure between May 2017 and June 2017 was

nothing

percent.

​>>> Answer to 2 decimal places.

​>>> If your answer is​ negative, include a minus sign. If your answer is​ positive, do not include a plus sign.

The percentage change in real personal consumption expenditure is

than the percentage change in personal consumption expenditure.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

PCE deflator = (personal consumption expenditure/ real personal consumption expenditure) *100

  1. Thus personal consumption expenditure in May 2017 is :

(PCE deflator * real personal consumption expenditure) / 100

= (112.275 * 11845)/100

= 1329897.38 /100

= $13298.973 Billion

2. PCE deflator in June 2017 is:

= (13305/11850)*100

= 1.12278 *100

= 112.2

3. % increase in real personal consumption expenditure is given by:

(real PCEJune - real PCEMay) / real PCEMay *100

= (11850- 11845)/11845 *100

= 5/11845 *100

= .000422 *100

=.042%

Now,

% increase in personal consumption expenditure is given by:

(PCEJune - PCEMay) / PCEMay *100

= (13305- 13298.973)/ 13298.973 *100

= 6.027 / 13298.973 *100

= .000453 *100

=.045%

Thus the % increase in real personal consumption expenditure was smaller than the % increase in personal consumption expenditure from May to June.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Component of GDP Previous Quarter Most Recent Quarter Consumer Spending – i.e. “Personal Consumption Expenditures” 3.8...
Component of GDP Previous Quarter Most Recent Quarter Consumer Spending – i.e. “Personal Consumption Expenditures” 3.8 3.5 Investment Spending i.e. “Gross Private Domestic Investment” -0.5 15.2 Government Spending – i.e. “Government Consumption Expenditures and gross investment” 2.5 2.6 Exports - i.e. “Exports.” 9.3 -4.9 Imports – i.e. “Imports” 13.5 -8.4 RGDP i.e. “Gross Domestic Product” – Line 1 7.6 4.9 Which components of GDP have increased in the most recent quarter (i.e. the percentage change > 0)? Which components of...
23-The relationship between households' planned consumption expenditures and households' level of disposable real income is called...
23-The relationship between households' planned consumption expenditures and households' level of disposable real income is called the investment function. the savings function. the household aggregate demand function. the consumption function. 25-Of the relationships below, which is the least stable? Investment Net exports Consumption Saving 28-In the multiplier process successive rounds of spending get smaller and smaller because the mps equals 0. mps is negative but less than -1. mps is positive and equals 1. mps is positive and less than...
1. Suppose the supply of money, measured by M1, is $2.9 trillion, output, measured by real...
1. Suppose the supply of money, measured by M1, is $2.9 trillion, output, measured by real GDP, is $15.8 trillion, and the velocity of money is 7.6. Suppose the supply of money increases to $3.9 trillion but GDP and the velocity of money do not change. What is the percent by which prices change? Provide your answer as a percentage rounded to two decimal places. Do not include any symbols, such as "$," "=," "%," or "," in your answer....
1.a) The Federal Reserve of St. Louis's web page includes statistics on real disposable personal income...
1.a) The Federal Reserve of St. Louis's web page includes statistics on real disposable personal income at DSPIC96 <http://research.stlouisfed.org:80/fred2/series/DSPIC96?&cid=110> and on real personal consumption expenditures at PCEC96 <http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/PCEC96?&cid=110>. Go to these pages and calculate the marginal propensity to consume by comparing the same month of two consecutive years, such as March 1998 and March 1999. For example, I would calculate the marginal propensity to consume using March 1998 and March 1999 as follows Subtract real personal consumption for March 1998...
There are few, if any, real companies with negative betas. But suppose you found one with...
There are few, if any, real companies with negative betas. But suppose you found one with β = −.22 a-1. How would you expect this stock's rate of return to change if the overall market rose by an extra 8%? (A negative answer should be indicated by a minus sign. Input your answer as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places.) Change in stock's rate of return % ______________ a-2. How would the stock's rate of return change if the...
Suppose GDP is 16.0 trillion and aggregate expenditures are 20.6 trillion. How does inventory change? Calculate...
Suppose GDP is 16.0 trillion and aggregate expenditures are 20.6 trillion. How does inventory change? Calculate the change in the level of inventory, if any. Provide your answer in dollars measured in trillions rounded to two decimal places. Use a negative sign "-" to indicate a decrease in inventory but do not include any other symbols, such as "$," "=," "%," or "," in your answer. Suppose for every 10 thousand dollar increase in income, consumption increases by 9.0 thousand...
Question 1 (1 point) Which of the following can cause relative PPP to NOT hold in...
Question 1 (1 point) Which of the following can cause relative PPP to NOT hold in the short run? Question 1 options: frictionless markets state-sponsored monopolies types of labor and unique skill sets than can only be found in one area or certain areas shipping costs Question 2 (1 point) If relative PPP holds, absolute PPP must hold. Question 2 options: True False Question 3 (1 point) In 2019, the US had the highest nominal GDP in the world, before...
Debby Kauffman and her two colleagues, Jamie Hiatt and Ella rincon are personal trainers at an...
Debby Kauffman and her two colleagues, Jamie Hiatt and Ella rincon are personal trainers at an upscale health spa/resot in Tampa, Florida. They want to start a health club that specializes in health plants for people in the fifty plus range. The growing pop in this age range and strong consumer interest in the health benefits pf phsyical activity have convinced them they can proitably operate their own club. In addition to many other deicisions, they need to determine what...
Will rate, thank you. Part 1: A project requires an initial investment of $100,000 and is...
Will rate, thank you. Part 1: A project requires an initial investment of $100,000 and is expected to produce a cash inflow before tax of $27,500 per year for five years. Company A has substantial accumulated tax losses and is unlikely to pay taxes in the foreseeable future. Company B pays corporate taxes at a rate of 34% and can depreciate the investment for tax purposes using the five-year MACRS tax depreciation schedule. Suppose the opportunity cost of capital is...
What is Cannibalization? Cannibalization results when the sales of a new product in part come from...
What is Cannibalization? Cannibalization results when the sales of a new product in part come from sales taken away from other products sold by that firm. Cannibalization most commonly occurs when a firm introduces a new flanker brand or line extension into the same product line in which it already has brand representation. For example, when Proctor & Gamble introduces a new brand of laundry detergent into its extensive line of detergents, some sales for the new brand will highly...