Question

In Fisher v. University of Texas, Austin, the Court upheld the university’s affirmative action program because...

In Fisher v. University of Texas, Austin, the Court upheld the university’s affirmative action program because it did not establish _________

Homework Answers

Answer #1

The Court held that the University of Texas’ use of race as a factor in the holistic review used to fill the spots remaining after the Top Ten Percent Plan was narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state interest. Previous precedent had established that educational diversity is a compelling interest as long as it is expressed as a concrete and precise goal that is neither a quota of minority students nor an amorphous idea of diversity. In this case, the Court determined that the University of Texas sufficiently expressed a series of concrete goals along with a reasoned explanation for its decision to pursue these goals along with a thoughtful consideration of why previous attempts to achieve the goals had not been successful. The University of Texas’ plan is also narrowly tailored to serve this compelling interest because there are no other available and workable alternatives for doing so.

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a dissent in which he argued that the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment categorically prohibits the use of race as a consideration in a higher education admissions process. In his separate dissent, Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr. wrote that majority’s decision was too deferential to the University of Texas’ determination that its use of race in the admissions process was narrowly tailored to serve a compelling interest and that the majority failed to properly apply strict scrutiny. Because the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause was enacted at least in part to prevent the government from treating individuals as merely components of racial class, race-based classifications, regardless of their purpose must be subject to the strictest level of constitutional scrutiny. In this case, the University of Texas’ use of race in its admissions policy cannot withstand strict scrutiny because the University’s interest is not sufficiently clearly defined and therefore judicial review to determine whether the policy is narrowly tailored is impossible. Even if it were, the goal of demographic diversity could only feasibly be achieved using impermissible quotas for racial balancing that are based on stereotypes. Justice Alito also argued that the use of racial preferences is unnecessary to achieve the goal of diversity because the admissions process could use a race-neutral holistic review based on life experiences that would achieve the same effect. Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. and Justice Clarence Thomas joined in the dissent.

Justice Elena Kagan did not participate in the discussion or decision of the case.

This is the detailed explanation.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Tomorrow is the big football game between the University of Texas in Austin and the University...
Tomorrow is the big football game between the University of Texas in Austin and the University of Oklahoma. As always, the game will be played in Dallas, which is halfway between the schools. For many years, the Oklahoma Boosters Club of Austin, Texas, has rented a billboard over the freeway in Austin for a few days and posted a huge sign making fun of the Texas team. The new owner of the billboard faces a business decision now, as the...
Scalisi et al. v. New York University Medical Center 805 N.Y.S.2d 62 (N.Y. App. Div., 1st...
Scalisi et al. v. New York University Medical Center 805 N.Y.S.2d 62 (N.Y. App. Div., 1st Dept., Dec. 6, 2005) The plaintiffs in this breach-of-contract action learned the importance of getting guarantees in writing. They allegedly entered into an oral agreement with the Medical Center for an in vitro fertilization procedure that would not result in the birth of an autistic child. Subsequently, the parties signed a written contract stating that a certain percentage of children are born with physical...
Questions: Given the broad precedent-setting scope of the ruling, could this be regarded as somewhat of...
Questions: Given the broad precedent-setting scope of the ruling, could this be regarded as somewhat of a ‘hollow victory?’ While the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of the plaintiffs, aren’t the Occupational Health concerns still outstanding? That is, although they have the right to do so, should women and men in the family-building stages of their lives work in high fetal-risk environments?        Case: Johnson Controls, Inc. Based in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Johnson Controls was the largest manufacturer of automobile...
What role could the governance of ethics have played if it had been in existence in...
What role could the governance of ethics have played if it had been in existence in the organization? Assess the leadership of Enron from an ethical perspective. THE FALL OF ENRON: A STAKEHOLDER FAILURE Once upon a time, there was a gleaming headquarters office tower in Houston, with a giant tilted "£"' in front, slowly revolving in the Texas sun. The Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies, collapsed in 2001 under a mountain of debt...
Discuss ethical issues that can be identified in this case and the mode of managing ethics...
Discuss ethical issues that can be identified in this case and the mode of managing ethics Enron finds itself in this case. How would you describe the ethical culture and levels of trust at Enron? Provide reasons for your assessment. THE FALL OF ENRON: A STAKEHOLDER FAILURE Once upon a time, there was a gleaming headquarters office tower in Houston, with a giant tilted "£"' in front, slowly revolving in the Texas sun. The Enron Corporation, which once ranked among...
Mattel Responds to Ethical Challenges Business Ethics This case was written by Debbie Thorne, John Fraedrich,...
Mattel Responds to Ethical Challenges Business Ethics This case was written by Debbie Thorne, John Fraedrich, O. C. Ferrell, and Jennifer Jackson, with the editorial assistance of Jennifer Sawayda. This case was developed for classroom discussion rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of an administrative, ethical, or legal discussion by management. All sources used for this case were obtained through publicly available material. Mattel, Inc. is a world leader in the design, manufacture, and marketing of family...