Question

1) Which statement about the Great Recession of 2008 is FALSE? The large collapse in output...

1) Which statement about the Great Recession of 2008 is FALSE?

The large collapse in output and employment that occurred after September 2008 was the result of the financial crisis.

The Federal Reserve made the crisis worse by using conventional monetary policy to lower interest rates.

The Great Recession of 2008 was caused by a large fall in aggregate demand.

The use of conventional monetary policy proved to be incapable on its own of stopping the large fall in output and employment.

The financial crisis which began in September 2008 was over a few months later because of government’s rescue efforts

2) Which statement about the use of conventional monetary during the Great Recession is most likely correct?

Using conventional monetary to combat the Great Recession only succeeded in increasing the inflation rate.

Using conventional monetary policy to combat the Great Recession had no impact on the fall of output and employment.

Using conventional monetary policy to combat the Great Depression will go down as one of the worst policy mistakes the Federal Reserve has ever made.

Using conventional monetary policy to combat the Great Recession worsen the fall of output and employment.

Using conventional monetary policy to combat the Great Recession did not prevent a large fall in output and employment, but prevented the collapse from being worse than it was.

3) Complete crowding out implies that:

A $100 billion increase in the money supply would raise the inflation rate because of a multiple increase in wages and prices.

A $100 billion decrease in government spending would reduce private spending by over $100 billion because the multiplier effect has a negative value.

A $100 billion increase in government spending would reduce private spending by $100 billion because the multiplier effect has a value of one.

A S100 billion increase in government spending would reduce private spending by more than $100 billion because the multiplier effect has a negative value.

A $100 billion increase in government spending would reduce private spending by $100 billion because the multiplier effect has a value of zero.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

1.

E.

The financial crisis lasted longer than the few months and the economy could only be recovered after few years with the joint effort of fiscal and monetary policy.

2.

B

There was no any significant impact upon the output level and employment due to the conventional monetary policy.

3.

E

Crowding out effect will offset the impact of increase in government spending, by reducing private spending and it will not show any impact. It will make the multiplier effect to be 0.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
If we find that our economy is in a recession, which of the following could the...
If we find that our economy is in a recession, which of the following could the Fiscal policy makers do to correct the situation? Decrease the money supply Reduce government spending Increase taxes Reduce taxes The marginal propensity to consume is typically: equal to one. often negative. between zero and one. greater than one. The income expenditure model predicts that if the marginal propensity to consume is 0.75 and the federal government increases spending by $100 billion, real GDP will...
Consider a hypothetical economy in which households spend $0.50 of each additional dollar of their after-tax...
Consider a hypothetical economy in which households spend $0.50 of each additional dollar of their after-tax income. The expenditure multiplier for this economy is___. Suppose that this economy is experiencing a recession. The government would like to stimulate aggregate demand and is deciding whether it should increase its spending by $1 billion or reduce income tax by $1 billion. Assume other things remain constant, and the marginal propensity to consume remains at 0.5. Before any multiplier effect takes place, a...
Suppose a hypothetical economy is currently in a situation of deficient aggregate demand of $64 billion....
Suppose a hypothetical economy is currently in a situation of deficient aggregate demand of $64 billion. Four economists agree that expansionary fiscal policy can increase total spending and move the economy out of recession, but they are debating which type of expansionary policy should be used. Economist A believes that the government spending multiplier is 8 and the tax multiplier is 2. Economist B believes that the government spending multiplier is 4 and the tax multiplier is 8. Compute the...
Monetary Policy and Fiscal Policy have in the past had relatively large impacts on the economy...
Monetary Policy and Fiscal Policy have in the past had relatively large impacts on the economy because of the multiplier effect. The multiplier comes from the fact that your spending turns into income for someone else, who then in turn spends some of that money. The multiplier is calculated using the simple formula 1/(1-MPC) where MPC is the marginal propensity to consumer (how much of each additional dollar in income is spent. Historically, this value has been 0.9, that is...
1. A real Keynesian model of a mixed economy with a marginal propensity to consume equal...
1. A real Keynesian model of a mixed economy with a marginal propensity to consume equal to .9 produces an equilibrium level of $2400 billion that is $600 billion below a full employment level of output. A) What change in government spending would bring about full employment? Be sure to calculate the government spending multiplier. B) The resulting increase in real output have driven up real interests rates from 3% to 4% and those higher real interest rates reduced investment...
A real Keynesian model of a mixed economy with a marginal propensity to consume equal to...
A real Keynesian model of a mixed economy with a marginal propensity to consume equal to .9 produces an equilibrium level of $2400 billion that is $600 billion below a full employment level of output. A) What change in government spending would bring about full employment? Be sure to calculate the government spending multiplier. B) The resulting increase in real output have driven up real interests rates from 3% to 4% and those higher real interest rates reduced investment by...
1a. The government of Turkey is facing a recession. Presume they plan a tax cut of...
1a. The government of Turkey is facing a recession. Presume they plan a tax cut of 40 Billion Euros and spending increase of 20 Billion. The MPC is 0.60. We are curious what the fiscal multiplier will be from the policy. What would be the total increase in GDP based on the fiscal multiplier using the data above? 1b. Using a more realistic multiplier - Let’s add some realism to the exercise and include the effects of taxes and import...
Some questions may contain one or more answers. Please explain why. 1) During the Great Recession,...
Some questions may contain one or more answers. Please explain why. 1) During the Great Recession, the goal of fiscal policy was to Increase aggregate demand Decrease aggregate supply None of these Decrease aggregate demand (incorrect) Increase aggregate supply 2) According to the Keynesian framework, which of the following may help a country reduce inflation, but will not help that country to get out of a recession? Increased spending by the government on health care An increase in military spending...
5. Using fiscal policy to avoid the recession of 2009. GDP in 2009 was roughly $15,000...
5. Using fiscal policy to avoid the recession of 2009. GDP in 2009 was roughly $15,000 billion ($15tr). GDP fell by approximately 3 percentage points in 2009. Throughout this question, assume that only consumption depends on Y. a. How many billion dollars is 3 percent of $15,000 billion? b. If the marginal propensity to consume were 0.5, by how much would government spending have to have increased to prevent a decrease in output? c. If the MPC were 0.5, by...
1) Assume China in 2008 has a per-capita income of$3000 and the U. S. has a...
1) Assume China in 2008 has a per-capita income of$3000 and the U. S. has a per-capita income of $40,000.Between 2008 and 2028 China grows at 9 percent while the U. S. grows at 2 percent. The per-capita income of China in 2028 will be and that of the U. S. will be a) 18148; 59672    b) 10148; 69672     C) 10148; 59672     d) 18148; 69672 ---- 2) If output is growing at 5% annually, how many years...