Question

If a plaintiff was injured by a defective product (which may even include an inadequate warning...

If a plaintiff was injured by a defective product (which may even include an inadequate warning label), then he or she can win without even proving fault (negligence). This category of law is called:

Group of answer choices

punitive damages

strict product liability

manufacturer's malpractice

intentional torts

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Option B.

Strict product liability refers to the law which requires the manufacturer to be liable for his actions if he produces and sells a defective product even if it did not harm the consumer.

The manufacture will have to pay a compensation amount to the consumer in this case without even proving his act of negligence in using the defective product.

Hence if a plaintiff was injured by a defective product, then he or she can win without even proving fault. This category of law is called strict product liability.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Case Study: Medical Product Liability What are the limits on medical product liability cases under federal...
Case Study: Medical Product Liability What are the limits on medical product liability cases under federal law? FACTS: On May 10, 1996, the plaintiff underwent a percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, intended to dilate his right coronary artery, which had been found to be “diffusely diseased” and “heavily calcified.” The physician used an Evergreen balloon catheter, which is specifically contraindicated for patients who have “diffuse or calcified stenosis.” During the procedure, the physician first attempted to remove the calcium deposits in...
The differences & similarities between the federal & state court systems. 2. The structure of the...
The differences & similarities between the federal & state court systems. 2. The structure of the Washington state court system; i.e. the trial court of general jurisdiction, the intermediate appellate court, the state supreme court. 3. Remember, Washington is in the 9 th Circuit Court of Appeals. 4. Under both the Washington state and federal court system, there is one appeal as of right. Appeals to the Washington Supreme Court(in the state system), or to the U.S. Supreme Court in...
Liebeck v. McDonalds Restaurants: The Original Coffee Product Liability Case James M. Dedman, IV Back in...
Liebeck v. McDonalds Restaurants: The Original Coffee Product Liability Case James M. Dedman, IV Back in 1994, Stella Liebeck v. McDonalds Restaurants became one of the most talked about lawsuits in American history. To this day, that New Mexico state court case is an essential component of any tort reform debate or discussion of litigation lore. At that time, and to this day, the thought of a fast food drive-thru customer spilling coffee on herself in her vehicle and later...
Mattel Responds to Ethical Challenges Business Ethics This case was written by Debbie Thorne, John Fraedrich,...
Mattel Responds to Ethical Challenges Business Ethics This case was written by Debbie Thorne, John Fraedrich, O. C. Ferrell, and Jennifer Jackson, with the editorial assistance of Jennifer Sawayda. This case was developed for classroom discussion rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of an administrative, ethical, or legal discussion by management. All sources used for this case were obtained through publicly available material. Mattel, Inc. is a world leader in the design, manufacture, and marketing of family...