Question

In U.S. v. Microsoft, the appellate court found that

Multiple Choice

• Microsoft's business practices were a per se violation of the Sherman Act.

• Microsoft illegally attempted to monopolize the browser market.

• Microsoft did not employ illegal anticompetitive means to maintain and further its monopoly of the operating system market.

• Microsoft employed illegal anticompetitive means to maintain and further its monopoly of the operating system market.

Answer 1

Ans:

Microsoft's business practices were a per se violation of the Sherman Act.

The complaint accused Microsoft of unlawfully defending its operating system monopoly and pursuing a new monopoly for its own browser, Internet Explorer.

The concern was that Microsoft would destroy Netscape, monopolize the browser market, and use that control point to conquer the coming web era.
Notwithstanding the imaginative editing of images, data, and emails, Microsoft has lost the case.

The presiding judge, Thomas Penfield Jackson, ruled that Microsoft had violated sections of the Sherman Antitrust Act, which was formed in 1890 to prohibit monopolies and cartels.

Other options are invalid because of the above justification.

Please don't forget to like the solution if it is helpful. Thank you.