Question

An energy manager is evaluating the purchase of two water heating systems. The first system has...

An energy manager is evaluating the purchase of two water heating systems. The first system has a standard efficiency of 85%. The system will cost $9,500 to install with an annual operating cost of $7,500. The second system has high efficiency of 94%. This system will cost $15,500 to install and has an annual operating cost of $4,700. Both systems will last 14 years. The discount rate of the organization is 15%. Which system would you recommend for purchase based on the least negative Net Present Value?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Answer -

It is natural to think in order to compare the economy,
We could use the Annual Value

Where second systems annual value is lower than first heating system so

Energy manager will perchase second system.

Here we can understand by illustration :-

First system standard efficiency is lower than second system.

Annual cost for first heating system is -

Total annual cost =Annual operating 4cost × no of years

$7,500 × 14 = $105,000

Total anual cost - discont

$105000 - $1,575 = $103,425

Total Annul cost + System cost = total paybel cost

$103,425+$9,500 = $112, 925

And for second heating system he have to pay

$4,700 × 14 = $65,800 = $70, 930

$65,800 - $9,870 = $55,930

$55,930 + $15,000 = $70,930.

$70930 is lower than $112,925

So energy manager will purchase second heating system.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Emporia Mills management is evaluating two alternative heating systems. Costs and projected energy savings are given...
Emporia Mills management is evaluating two alternative heating systems. Costs and projected energy savings are given in the following table. The firm uses 12.27 percent to discount such project cash flows. Year System 100 System 200 0 $-2,053,200 $-1,741,800 1 314,410 701,900 2 520,830 460,300 3 529,940 614,300 4 656,200 314,000 What is the NPV of the systems? (Enter negative amounts using negative sign e.g. -45.25. Do not round discount factors. Round answers to 0 decimal places, e.g. 5,275.) NPV...
Emporia Mills is evaluating two alternative heating systems. Costs and projected energy savings are given in...
Emporia Mills is evaluating two alternative heating systems. Costs and projected energy savings are given in the following table. The firm uses 11.5 percent to discount such project cash flows. Which system should be chosen? Year System 100 System 200 0 $(1,750,000) $(1,735,000) 1 $275,223 $750,000 2 $512,445 $612,500 3 $648,997 $550,112 4 $875,000 $384,226
A company is evaluating two different computer systems for purchase. The company uses a MARR of...
A company is evaluating two different computer systems for purchase. The company uses a MARR of 4% to evaluate investments. The information for the two systems is in the following table: A B First Cost $20,000 $10,000 Annual Maintenance $5,000 $4,000 Annual Cost Savings $7,000 $5,000 Salvage Value $1,300 $1,000 Expected Life 3 years 2 years Based on present worth analysis, what is the present worth of system A? Hints: 1. What do you need to consider when evaluating multiple...
Problem 6 The plant engineer is considering purchase of a solar water heating system. The firm’s...
Problem 6 The plant engineer is considering purchase of a solar water heating system. The firm’s MARR is 8%. The solar water heating system would save the company $900 annually in electricity costs, and would be expected to last 20 years. Maintenance will cost $150 per year. The expected salvage value for the system at the end of 20 years is $500. a) In order for this solar water heating system to pay for itself (that is, break even), what...
The Tempo Golf and Country Club in London, Ontario, is evaluating two different irrigation system options....
The Tempo Golf and Country Club in London, Ontario, is evaluating two different irrigation system options. An underground automatic irrigation system will cost $9.2 million to install and $81,300 pre-tax annually to operate. It will not have to be replaced for 20 years. An aboveground system will cost $6.8 million to install, but $203,000 per year to operate. The aboveground equipment has an effective operating life of nine years. The country club leases its land from the city and both...
Lang Industrial Systems Company (LISC) is trying to decide between two different conveyor belt systems. System...
Lang Industrial Systems Company (LISC) is trying to decide between two different conveyor belt systems. System A costs $216,000, has a four-year life, and requires $69,000 in pretax annual operating costs. System B costs $306,000, has a six-year life, and requires $63,000 in pretax annual operating costs. Both systems are to be depreciated straight-line to zero over their lives and will have zero salvage value. Whichever project is chosen, it will not be replaced when it wears out. The tax...
Hagar Industrial Systems Company (HISC) is trying to decide between two different conveyor belt systems. System...
Hagar Industrial Systems Company (HISC) is trying to decide between two different conveyor belt systems. System A costs $200,000, has a four-year life, and requires $65,000 in pretax annual operating costs. System B costs $282,000, has a six-year life, and requires $59,000 in pretax annual operating costs. Both systems are to be depreciated straight-line to zero over their lives and will have zero salvage value. Whichever system is chosen, it will not be replaced when it wears out. The tax...
Letang Industrial Systems Company (LISC) is trying to decide between two different conveyor belt systems. System...
Letang Industrial Systems Company (LISC) is trying to decide between two different conveyor belt systems. System A costs $300,000, has a four-year life, and requires $101,000 in pretax annual operating costs. System B costs $380,000, has a six-year life, and requires $95,000 in pretax annual operating costs. Both systems are to be depreciated straight-line to zero over their lives and will have zero salvage value. Whichever project is chosen, it will not be replaced when it wears out. The tax...
Lang Industrial Systems Company (LISC) is trying to decide between two different conveyor belt systems. System...
Lang Industrial Systems Company (LISC) is trying to decide between two different conveyor belt systems. System A costs $268,000, has a four-year life, and requires $82,000 in pretax annual operating costs. System B costs $378,000, has a six-year life, and requires $76,000 in pretax annual operating costs. Suppose LISC always needs a conveyor belt system; when one wears out, it must be replaced. Assume the tax rate is 35 percent and the discount rate is 10 percent. Calculate the EAC...
Hagar Industrial Systems Company (HISC) is trying to decide between two different conveyor belt systems. System...
Hagar Industrial Systems Company (HISC) is trying to decide between two different conveyor belt systems. System A costs $325,000, has a 4-year life, and requires $121,000 in pretax annual operating costs. System B costs $405,000, has a 6-year life, and requires $115,000 in pretax annual operating costs. Suppose the company always needs a conveyor belt system; when one wears out, it must be replaced. Assume the tax rate is 22 percent and the discount rate is 11 percent. Calculate the...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT