Question

Labor productivity and GDP 1. The following table shows data for a hypothetical economy in 2006...

Labor productivity and GDP

1. The following table shows data for a hypothetical economy in 2006 and 2007.

Use the table to answer the questions that follow.

(Hint: When calculating growth rate for population use the following formula: Population Growth Rate=Population in 2007−Population in 2006Population in 2006×100Population Growth Rate=Population in 2007−Population in 2006Population in 2006×100. You will need to use similarly structured formulas for calculating growth rate of real GDP per person and the growth rate of labor productivity).

2006

2007

Population

400,000

408,000

Number of Hours Worked

875,000,000

875,000,000

Real GDP

$7,000,000,000

$7,068,600,000

Real GDP per Person

Labor Productivity

  1. The growth rate of the population between 2006 and 2007 is1%, 2%, -2%, or -1%?

Calculate real GDP per person in 2006 and 2007 and enter the values in the previous table.

  1. The growth rate of real GDP per person between 2006 and 2007 is1%, 2%, -2%, or -1%?

Calculate labor productivity in 2006 and 2007, and enter the values in the previous table. (Note: Enter your answer to the nearest penny.

Hint: Labor productivity is equal to real GDP divided by the number of hours worked, so the unit of measurement is dollars per hour.

  1. Based on your calculations, the growth rate of labor productivity between 2006 and 2007 is1%, 2%, -2%, or -1%?

  1. Assuming that real GDP per person is a good measure of living standards, between 2006 and 2007, living standards(declined, did not change, or improved) for which of the following reasons?

  • Productivity growth outpaced population growth.
  • The number of hours worked remained the same.
  • Population growth outpaced productivity growth.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

2006

2007

Population

400,000

408,000

Number of Hours Worked

875,000,000

875,000,000

Real GDP

$7,000,000,000

$7,068,600,000

Real GDP per Person

=7000000000/400000

=17500

=7068600000/408000

=17325

Labor Productivity

=7000000000/875000000

=8

=7068600000/875000000

=8.0784

The growth rate of the population between 2006 and 2007 : 408000-400000/400000x100 = 2%

The growth rate of real GDP per person between 2006 and 2007 is : 17325-17500/17500x100 = -1%

The growth rate of labor productivity between 2006 and 2007 is: 8.0784-8/8x100 = 1%

Assuming that real GDP per person is a good measure of living standards, between 2006 and 2007, living standards(declined) for which of the following reasons?

  • Population growth outpaced productivity growth.
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
The following table shows data for a hypothetical economy in 2006 and 2007. Use the table...
The following table shows data for a hypothetical economy in 2006 and 2007. Use the table to answer the questions that follow. (Hint: When calculating growth rate for population use the following formula: Population Growth Rate=Population in 2007−Population in 2006Population in 2006×100Population Growth Rate=Population in 2007−Population in 2006Population in 2006×100. You will need to use similarly structured formulas for calculating growth rate of real GDP per person and the growth rate of labor productivity). 2006 2007 Population 400,000 412,000 Number...
                                          &nb
                                                               Table 1 Item                                                                                                             1998                     1999 Aggregate Hours Worked (billions)                                                        25.0                      25.2 Real GDP (billions of 1992 dollars)                                                          840                       880 a) Calculate the growth rate of real GDP in 1999. b) Calculate labor productivity in 1998. c) Calculate labor productivity in 1999. d) Calculate the growth rate of labor productivity in 1999. (Hint: Labor productivity is real GDP per hour of labor; that is, it is real GDP divided by aggregate hours worked).
2) •Real GDP grew at 3.3% per year •Capital’s share of income has averaged about 1/3...
2) •Real GDP grew at 3.3% per year •Capital’s share of income has averaged about 1/3 in the United States. •The capital stock grew at 3.3% per year. •The labor force grew at 1.7% per year. The increase in real GDP per capita in the United States from 1949 to 2010 A) was due to increased labor productivity. B) was due to an increase in the hours worked per person. C) was due to both increased in labor productivity and...
Year Quantity of Labor Productivity of Labor 1 2,000 $200 2 2,000 210 3 2,000 210...
Year Quantity of Labor Productivity of Labor 1 2,000 $200 2 2,000 210 3 2,000 210 The table shows the quantity of labor (measured in hours) and the productivity of labor (measured in real GDP per hour) in a hypothetical economy in three different years. Between Year 2 and Year 3, real GDP increased by 5 percent. 2 percent. 10 percent. 15 percent.
You have been given the following data on Pakistan GDP: Nominal GDP GDP Deflator Year in...
You have been given the following data on Pakistan GDP: Nominal GDP GDP Deflator Year in billions of rupees (Base Year = 2006) 2019 38,559 282 2015 27,443 245 Calculate the growth rate of nominal GDP between 2015 and 2019. (Hint: the average annual growth for variable X for N-years can be calculated as .) (0.5 Marks) Calculate the growth rate of GDP deflator between 2015 and 2019. (0.5 Marks) Calculate real GDP in 2015 measured in 2006 prices. (0.5...
The table below shows the real GDP (US$) for two countries in 2019. Table 2 Country...
The table below shows the real GDP (US$) for two countries in 2019. Table 2 Country A Country B GDP (constant 2010 US$) 4.6 million 3 million Population 12,000 8,000 Total hours of employment 80,000 48,000 a) Based on the information provided in Table 2, analyse whether it is correct to assume that productivity and standard of living is higher in country A than country B. Workings has to be shown.                                                                                                                            b) Generally, most economists agree that increases in...
Discussion #6 – Consumer Price Index (CPI), Productivity and standard of living. The CPI is a...
Discussion #6 – Consumer Price Index (CPI), Productivity and standard of living. The CPI is a measure of the overall cost of the goods and services bought by a typical consumer and it is used to calculate the rate of inflation. The government agency that is responsible for calculating the CPI is the Bureau of Labor and Statistics. The Bureau collects data and compares prices in more than 80,000 items in major metropolitan areas of the U.S. A base year...
Q1. Which event from below is not expected to improve labor productivity? A.The acquisition of more...
Q1. Which event from below is not expected to improve labor productivity? A.The acquisition of more education and training by the labor force. B.Technological advance. C.The realization of economies of scale. D.An increase in the size of the labor force. Q2. Say, you know that the labor productivity is increasing by 2 percent every year due to technology improvements. Knowing this and keeping everything else equal, estimate the number of years for the standards of living to double A.35 years....
The accompanying table shows data on nominal GDP (in billions of dollars), real GDP (in billions...
The accompanying table shows data on nominal GDP (in billions of dollars), real GDP (in billions of 2005 dollars), and population (in thousands) of the United States in 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, and 2010. The U.S. price level rose consistently over the period 1960–2010. Year Nominal GDP (billions of dollars) Real GDP (billions of 2005 dollars) Population (thousands) 1960 $526.4 $2,828.5 180,760 1970 1,038.5 4,266.3 205,089 1980 2,788.1 5,834.0 227,726 1990 5,800.5 8,027.1 250,181 2000 9,951.5 11,216.4 282,418 2010...
I have the following problems: --21) Suppose France's real GDP grew from $750 billion in 2010...
I have the following problems: --21) Suppose France's real GDP grew from $750 billion in 2010 to $821 billion in 2011. What was the growth rate of France's real GDP? A) 8.6 percent B) 9.5 percent C) 9.1 percent D) 10 percent --23) Sustained increases in the standard of living depend on A) decreases in labor productivity. B) increases in the quantity of labor. C) increases in aggregate hours. D) increases in labor productivity --16) The difference between nominal and...