Question

Suppose two point sources are discharging phosphorus into Wisconsin’s Fox River and face the following abatement...

Suppose two point sources are discharging phosphorus into Wisconsin’s Fox River and face the following abatement costs for this pollutant:

Point Source 1: TAC1 = 500 + 0.35(A1)2 MAC1 = 0.7A1

Point Source 2: TAC2 = 750 + 1.05(A2)2 MAC2 = 2.1A2,

where A1 and A2 represent the abatement of phosphorus effluents in pounds by Source 1 and Source 2, respectively, and TAC and MAC are measured in hundreds of dollars.

Assume that the state environmental authority has set the total maximum daily load (TMDL) for the Fox River. To achieve this limit, 40 pounds of phosphorus must be abated across the two point sources. Use this information to answer the following questions.

a. If a uniform abatement standard is used by the regulatory authority, what would be the dollar values of TAC and MAC for each source?

b. Based on your answer to part (a), is there an economic incentive for the sources to participate in the trading program? Explain briefly.

c. Quantify the cost savings associated with a cost-effective abatement allocation achieved through trading.

d. What should be the price level of the tradable permits to achieve the cost-effective solution?

Homework Answers

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
The marginal abatement (control) costs for two air pollutants sources that affect a single receptor are...
The marginal abatement (control) costs for two air pollutants sources that affect a single receptor are MAC1 = $0.6 q1 and MAC2 = $1.0q2, where q1 and q2 are emissions abated. Their respective transfer coefficients are a1 = 3.0 and a2 = 2.0. Without any control, they would each emit 20 units of emissions each. The ambient standard is 24 ppm. I. If an ambient permit system were established, how many permits would be issued and what price would prevail?...
Two polluting firms can control emissions of a pollutant by incurring the following marginal abatement costs:...
Two polluting firms can control emissions of a pollutant by incurring the following marginal abatement costs: MAC1 = $300?1, and MAC2 = $100?2 where ?1, and ?2 are the amount of emissions abated (i.e., pollution controlled) by firm 1 and firm 2 respectively. Assume that with no abatement of emissions at all, firm 1 would release 15 units of pollution and firm 2 would release 10 units, for a total of 25 units. Assume the target level of abatement is...
Suppose that there are two firms (1 and 2) with marginal abatement cost (MAC) curves as...
Suppose that there are two firms (1 and 2) with marginal abatement cost (MAC) curves as follows: MAC1 = 160 − 4E1 MAC2 = 100 − E2 (E1 and E2 represent the respective amounts of emissions in litres.) a-)What are the marginal abatement cost curves of these two firms as a function of their abatement? b-)What would the industry-wide emissions be after 40 litres of abatement? c-)Calculate the industry total cost of abatement if each firm abates 20 litres. d-)Derive...
In this situation there are two independent firms, each emitting 15 units of pollutants into the...
In this situation there are two independent firms, each emitting 15 units of pollutants into the environment for a total of 30 units in their region. The government imposes an abatement standard of 15 units. The polluter’s cost functions are as follows: TAC1 = 5 + 0.75(A1)^2 and MAC1 = 2A1 and TAC2 = 5 + 0.5(A2)^2 and MAC2 = A2, where A is units of abatement undertaken by a firm a. Suppose that the government mandates each company to...
1. Consider the problem of two polluting sources in the region, each of which generated 10...
1. Consider the problem of two polluting sources in the region, each of which generated 10 units of pollution for a total of 20 units released into the environment. The government determined that emissions must be reduced by 12 units across the region to achieve the ”socially desirable level of pollu- tion”. Each firm faces different abatement cost conditions modelled as follows: for Polluter 1, marginal abatement cost is MAC1 = 26- 2.6E1. For Polluter 2, marginal abatement cost is...
Problem 1 What is the difference between cost effectiveness and efficiency? Problem 2 Assume that the...
Problem 1 What is the difference between cost effectiveness and efficiency? Problem 2 Assume that the market demand curve for diamonds is given by the following equation: PD = 1000 ? 2 QE, and the market supply curve, which is equal to the aggregated marginal cost curve of all producers, is given by, PS = 200 + 2 QU Diamond production, however, is associated with harmful side effects on both workers and nearby households and firms. The total damage to...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT