Question

The table below is an application of a one-shot game. Identify and explain the dominant strategy...

The table below is an application of a one-shot game. Identify and explain the dominant strategy of each firm and the Nash equilibrium.

Firm B

Firm A

Price Strategy $

300

500

300

10,000; 10,000

50,000; -15,000

500

-15,000; 50,000

30,000; 30,000

Homework Answers

Answer #1

When Firm A chooses $300 price strategy, Firm B's best response is $300 price strategy (10,000)
When Firm A chooses $500 price strategy, Firm B's best response is $300 price strategy (50,000)
So, Firm B's dominant strategy is $300 price strategy as it is Firm B's best response irrespective of Firm A's strategy choice.

When Firm B chooses $300 price strategy, Firm A's best response is $300 price strategy (10,000)
When Firm B chooses $500 price strategy, Firm A's best response is $300 price strategy (50,000)
So, Firm A's dominant strategy is $300 price strategy as it is Firm A's best response irrespective of Firm B's strategy choice.

The nash equilibrium of the game is (10,000, 10,000) or ($300, $300) as best response of both firms occur simulatenously at this outcome.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
We know that the one-shot prisoner’s dilemma game results in a dominant Nash equilibrium strategy that...
We know that the one-shot prisoner’s dilemma game results in a dominant Nash equilibrium strategy that is Pareto inefficient. Suppose we allow the two prisoners to retaliate after their respective prison terms. Formally, what aspect of the game would this affect? Could a Pareto efficient outcome result?
a. i. If a game has a dominant strategy equilibrium, does it have a Nash equilibrium?...
a. i. If a game has a dominant strategy equilibrium, does it have a Nash equilibrium? ii. If a game has a Nash equilibrium, does it have a dominant strategy equilibrium? iii. If one firm has a dominant strategy, can another firm take advantage of that fact in deciding on its optimal strategy? iv. Can a game have more than one dominant strategy equilibrium? v. Can a game have more than one Nash equilibrium? b) There are only two firms...
Fill in a payoff matrix for a prisoner’s dilemma game where one player has a dominant...
Fill in a payoff matrix for a prisoner’s dilemma game where one player has a dominant strategy and the other doesn’t. Firm 2 in Duopoly Firm 1 in Duopoly a. Explain the dominant and non-dominant strategy of the firms. b. Is there a Nash equilibrium in your game? Explain.
Consider the following simultaneous-move, one-shot game facing two firms (Firm I and Firm II), with the...
Consider the following simultaneous-move, one-shot game facing two firms (Firm I and Firm II), with the payoffs given in Table1. The firms are not able to coordinate or communicate. Each firm has three strategic options (options A, B and C for Firm I and D, E and F for Firm II). Table 1 Firm II Firm I Strategy D E F A 100, 125 300, 250 200, 260 B 250, 0 350, 300 340, 400 C 0, -100 400, 300...
If only one player has a dominant strategy in a game with two players, will there...
If only one player has a dominant strategy in a game with two players, will there be a Nash equilibrium?
Consider the following simultaneous-move, one-shot game facing two firms (Firm A and Firm B), with the...
Consider the following simultaneous-move, one-shot game facing two firms (Firm A and Firm B), with the payoffs given in Table I. Assume the firms are not able to coordinate or communicate. Firm A and B each has three strategic options. Table I Firm B Firm A Strategy Low average high Small 100, 125 300, 200 200, 190 Medium 250, 0 470, 340 480, 300 Large 300, -100 450, 450 475, 360 (a). For each of the firms, identify the dominant...
PAYOFF MATRIX FOR A PRICING GAME FIRM B Low Price High Price FIRM A Low Price...
PAYOFF MATRIX FOR A PRICING GAME FIRM B Low Price High Price FIRM A Low Price (50,000; 50,000) (80,000; 30,000) High Price (30,000; 80,000) (20,000; 20,000) From the above payoff matrix where the payoffs are the profits of the two firms, determine whether: Firm A has a dominant strategy. If so, what is it?      Firm B has a dominant strategy. If so, what is it? The optimal strategy for each firm if there is any. Will a Nash equilibrium exist...
Two firms play the game below. Each must choose strategy 1 or 2. They choose their...
Two firms play the game below. Each must choose strategy 1 or 2. They choose their strategies simultaneously and without cooperating with each other. Firm A?'s payoffs are on the left side of each? cell, and Firm B?'s payoffs are on the right. Firm A Firm B Strategy 1 Strategy 2 Strategy 1 10, 16 8, 12 Strategy 2 13, 12 17, 10 Determine the dominant strategy for each firm. 1) For Firm A : A. Strategy 1 is a...
Consider the following one-shot simultaneous game: Firm 2 Advertising campaign Do nothing Firm 1 Advertising campain...
Consider the following one-shot simultaneous game: Firm 2 Advertising campaign Do nothing Firm 1 Advertising campain 3, 8 20, 8 Offer discounts 6, 8 9, 2 Do nothing 7, 10 9, 12 a. State all the dominated strategies in the game, by which strategy they are dominated, and whether weakly or strictly. b. What is the equilibrium outcome by dominance (by elimination of dominated strategies), if any? c. What is (or are) the pure strategy Nash equilibria of this game?
Payoffs below are in millions of dollars                                    &nb
Payoffs below are in millions of dollars                                                                                         Firm B                                                                                 Strategy 1        Strategy 2                                                                                                                    Strategy 1:   23, 24                25, 27                                                            Firm A                                                                                              Strategy 2:   26, 30               21, 32                                                                                                              5. (2 pts.) In this single shot simultaneous play game, identify any and all Nash equilibria.              6. (2 pts.) Suppose Firm B has the option of going first, i.e. being a first mover in a sequential game with the above payoffs. To go first though, Firm B will incur a cost of $2 million dollars....
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT