Question

Environmental Economics The table below shows the marginal abatement costs of three firms for various levels...

Environmental Economics

The table below shows the marginal abatement costs of three firms for various levels of emissions. Each firm is currently emitting 10 tons per week, so total emissions are 30 tons per week. Suppose we wish to reduce total emissions by 50 percent, to 15 tons per week.

Emissions

(tons/week)

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

Marginal abatement costs ($/ton):

Firm A

0

1

2

3

6

10

14

18

23

30

38

Firm B

0

2

3

7

12

18

25

36

42

48

56

Firm C

0

6

12

18

24

30

36

42

54

69

86

        a.     Calculate the total cost of reducing emissions (TAC) to 15 tons per week with an equi-proportional decrease in emissions. Show your calculation, clearly indicating the emission level and TAC for each firm. Keep in mind that the above table shows the MAC, not the TAC.

        b.    Calculate the total cost of reducing emissions (TAC) to 15 tons per week in a manner that meets the equimarginal principle. Again, show your calculation, clearly indicating the emission level and TAC for each firm.

        c.     What is the difference in the overall TC of abatement between the equimarginal allocation compared to the equi-proportional allocation and which is lower?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Equiproportional Decrease will be equal decrease for each firm i.e. 5 units per firm

Total abatement cost for first five unit for firm A=1+2+3+6+10=$22 for B=2+3+7+12+18=$42,For C=6+12+18+24+30=$90 Hence, Total abatement cost through equiproportional Decrease=90+42+22=$154 (a)

b) in equimarginal decrease decrease is done with last unit reduced having same marginal cost across firms

Total unit needs to be reduced =15 now 7th unit of reduction from A cost $18 which is same for 5th unit in B and3rd unit in C so total abatement of unit=7+5+3=15 which is what the target was, Hence cost for A=1+2+3+6+10+14+18=$54, For B=2+3+7+12+18=$42 and for C=6+12+18=36 so, Total abatement cost=54+42+36=$132

c) Equimarginal abatement cost is lower than equiproportional by 154-132=$22

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Emissions (tons/month) Marginal Abatement Cost Total Abatement Cost Total Subsidy at $150/ton Total tax bill at...
Emissions (tons/month) Marginal Abatement Cost Total Abatement Cost Total Subsidy at $150/ton Total tax bill at $150/ton Total Costs 10 0 0 9 15 15 8 30 45 7 50 95 6 70 165 5 95 260 4 120 380 3 150 530 2 185 715 1 230 945 0 290 1,235 50. What optimal level of emissions would the above firm choose given the subsidy level detailed above? 51. If the above firm emits the optimal level of emissions...
Please answer E only . Below are the marginal abatement costs from two different sources. They...
Please answer E only . Below are the marginal abatement costs from two different sources. They currently emit 100 tons each. A. What would the total abatement cost be for an equiporportional cutback to a total of 100 tons? B. Suppose we issue 10 transferable permits, each entitles the firm to 10 tons of emissions. They are distributed equally to both sources. What are the final emissions each of the two sources?             C. What are the total abatement costs...
Two polluting firms emit 200 tons of SO2 each, with Marginal Abatement Costs given by MAC1=...
Two polluting firms emit 200 tons of SO2 each, with Marginal Abatement Costs given by MAC1= 2X1 and MAC2= 3X2, respectively. Xi represents the level of abatement for each firm i, in tons. The government wants to reduce total SO2 emissions by 30% and decides to impose a uniform cap on emissions, with each firm receiving 140 allowances for free (firms don’t pay for allowance). a) In a first moment assume polluters are not allowed to trade, so each firm...
Use the following to answer the questions below: Below are the marginal costs of abating pollution...
Use the following to answer the questions below: Below are the marginal costs of abating pollution for three firms in an industry, based on their emissions levels. Each firm is now emitting 10 tons/week, so total emissions are 30 tons/week. Suppose we wish to reduce total emissions by 50 percent, to 15 tons per week in this industry. Marginal Abatement Costs ($/ton) Emissions (tons/week) Firm 1 Firm 2 Firm 3 10 0 0 0 9 5 1 1 8 9...
Two polluting firms emit 200 tons of SO2 each, with Marginal Abatement Costs given by MAC1=...
Two polluting firms emit 200 tons of SO2 each, with Marginal Abatement Costs given by MAC1= 2X1 and MAC2= 3X2, respectively. Xi represents the level of abatement for each firm i, in tons. The government wants to reduce total SO2 emissions by 30% and decides to impose a uniform cap on emissions, with each firm receiving 140 allowances for free (firms don’t pay for allowance). What is the market price of SO2 abatement? How many permits are traded between firms,...
Two polluting firms can control emissions of a pollutant by incurring the following marginal abatement costs:...
Two polluting firms can control emissions of a pollutant by incurring the following marginal abatement costs: MAC1 = $300?1, and MAC2 = $100?2 where ?1, and ?2 are the amount of emissions abated (i.e., pollution controlled) by firm 1 and firm 2 respectively. Assume that with no abatement of emissions at all, firm 1 would release 15 units of pollution and firm 2 would release 10 units, for a total of 25 units. Assume the target level of abatement is...
Two firms, A and B, currently pollute the air. Each firm currently emits 6 units in...
Two firms, A and B, currently pollute the air. Each firm currently emits 6 units in each period. A study shows that total economic surplus can be increased by reducing the total level of emissions by 6 units. The cost to each of the two firms of reducing their emissions is shown in the table below. Marginal Cost of Reducing Emissions ($/unit) Unit Reduced Firm A Firm B 1 10 18 2 15 28 3 20 45 4 25 57...
The table below shows the total cost (TC) and marginal cost (MC) for Choco Lovers, a...
The table below shows the total cost (TC) and marginal cost (MC) for Choco Lovers, a monopolistic firm producing different quantities of chocolate gift boxes. Fill in the blanks in the table. Quantity Price Total REVENUE TOTAL COST MARGINAL COST MARGINAL REVENUE 0 $19 $0 $30 - - 25 18 450 205 $7 30 510 237.5 6.5 12 35 16 272.5 10 40 15 600 312.5 8 8 45 14 630 10 50 13 650 422.5 12 4 INSTRUCTIONS; ENTER...
The following table shows​ William's utility from consuming slices of pizza and cans of Coke. Slices...
The following table shows​ William's utility from consuming slices of pizza and cans of Coke. Slices of PizzaPizza Total Utility from PizzaPizza Marginal Utility from Last Slice Cans of CokeCoke Total Utility from CokeCoke Marginal Utility from Last Can 0 0 ​- 0 ​- ​- 1 36 36 1 30 30 2 66 30 2 55 25 3 90 24 3 75 20 4 108 18 4 90 15 5 120 12 5 100 10 6 126 6 6 105...
The table below show the marginal utility, measured in utils, that Ricardo would get by purchasing...
The table below show the marginal utility, measured in utils, that Ricardo would get by purchasing various amounts of products A, B, C, and D. Column 5 shows the marginal utility Ricardo gets from saving. Assume that the prices of A, B, C, and D are, respectively, $18, $6, $4, and $24 and that Ricardo has a budget of $106. Quantity of A MU of A Quantity of B MU of B Quantity of C MU of C Quantity of...