Question

Explain the three (3) part test developed by the Supreme Court in the 1971 case of...

Explain the three (3) part test developed by the Supreme Court in the 1971 case of Lemon v. Kurtzman

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Part three test or lemon test was developed by the Supreme Court. Government should not make any rule or legislations that are against the Establishment clause of first amendment. Establishment clause of first amendment ensures that no law violates the secular structure of constitution. Government should not favor any religion. Following are points of test:

  • Intent of law should be secular.
  • It should not inhibit or advance any religion.
  • It should not lead to excessive entanglement of government in religious matter.
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Imagine that you are a Supreme Court justice deciding the Dred Scott v. Sanford case. Explain...
Imagine that you are a Supreme Court justice deciding the Dred Scott v. Sanford case. Explain why you would rule in favor of Sanford.
True or False: Miranda v. Arizona was a 1926 United States Supreme Court case.
True or False: Miranda v. Arizona was a 1926 United States Supreme Court case.
Why was the landmark Supreme Court case Lawrence v. Texas so important? Add in text citation...
Why was the landmark Supreme Court case Lawrence v. Texas so important? Add in text citation and reference
Discuss the Arizona Supreme Court case of Simat Corp v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System.
Discuss the Arizona Supreme Court case of Simat Corp v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System.
In this assignment, you have the opportunity to review a Supreme Court case decision written in...
In this assignment, you have the opportunity to review a Supreme Court case decision written in 1979 that is still good law today and affects everyone who drives an automobile. Use any web browser to look up the above case of Taylor v Superior Court. 24 Cal 3rd indicates that the case is located in volume 24 of the official reports of the Supreme Ct. of California (3rd series) at page 890.                 There the court grappled with an award...
Explain what the Supreme Court means in the Village of Euclid when the Court says “a...
Explain what the Supreme Court means in the Village of Euclid when the Court says “a degree of elasticity is thus imparted… to the application of constitutional principles.” (1 point) Be detailed and site sources.
In the case of Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission, the Supreme Court ruled that        Individuals,...
In the case of Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission, the Supreme Court ruled that        Individuals, but not unions and corporations, could spend unlimited money on federal elections        Individual campaign contributions were limited to $50        Unions and corporations could spend unlimited money from their general treasuries on federal elections        Political Action committees could spend unlimited money on Federal elections
Discuss the impact of McCulloch v. Maryland on American Federalism. How has this landmark Supreme Court...
Discuss the impact of McCulloch v. Maryland on American Federalism. How has this landmark Supreme Court case helped to define the relationship between the national and state government?   
16. The New Jersey Supreme Court decided, in the case of A.P. Smith Manufacturing v. Barlow,...
16. The New Jersey Supreme Court decided, in the case of A.P. Smith Manufacturing v. Barlow, the legal question of: A. Whether corporations could give to charity. B. Whether corporations could give paid vacation time to employees. C. Whether employees of corporations could give to charity. D. Whether employees of corporations were entitled to paid vacation time.
Antitrust a) In the Grinnell opinion (to the Sherman Act), the Supreme Court set out a...
Antitrust a) In the Grinnell opinion (to the Sherman Act), the Supreme Court set out a two-prong test for illegal monopolization. What are these two prongs? b) Briefly describe Deutscher Tennis Bund v. ATP Tour Inc c) Briefly describe Gunter Harz Sports v. USTA
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT