Question

What was the Supreme Court's decision in the 1963 case Gideon v. Wainwright?

What was the Supreme Court's decision in the 1963 case Gideon v. Wainwright?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

the 1963 case Gideon v. Wainwright is a remarkable case in the judicial history of the United States. In this case, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that under the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, in case of criminal cases states are obliged to provide counsel to represent defendants who cannot afford to pay their own attorneys. Therefore, the decision of the supreme court actually extended the 'right to counsel' established under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Consider the decision by the US Supreme Court concerning any recent major case that interests you....
Consider the decision by the US Supreme Court concerning any recent major case that interests you. It could be anything from gay marriage, to voter rights, to immigration. Briefly discuss the pros and cons of the case and give your own opinion of the court's decision.
In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Bush V. Gore, what effect did the judicial...
In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Bush V. Gore, what effect did the judicial philosophy of the Court have on the outcome?
Miranda v. Arizona is a very well know U.S. Supreme Court decision. Who does this decision...
Miranda v. Arizona is a very well know U.S. Supreme Court decision. Who does this decision protect? How is law enforcement affected by this decision?
How will the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby (divided 5-4 decision) impact...
How will the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby (divided 5-4 decision) impact Hobby Lobby’s stakeholders and its future success?
True or False: Miranda v. Arizona was a 1926 United States Supreme Court case.
True or False: Miranda v. Arizona was a 1926 United States Supreme Court case.
The Supreme Court’s “separate but equal” rule in a school segregation case in 1896 was: A...
The Supreme Court’s “separate but equal” rule in a school segregation case in 1896 was: A A defeat for the Southern states. B Reaffirmed by the court’s Brown v. Board of Education decision in 1954. C Overturned by the court’s Brown v. Board of Education decision in 1954. D An important step toward racial equality. D
In this assignment, you have the opportunity to review a Supreme Court case decision written in...
In this assignment, you have the opportunity to review a Supreme Court case decision written in 1979 that is still good law today and affects everyone who drives an automobile. Use any web browser to look up the above case of Taylor v Superior Court. 24 Cal 3rd indicates that the case is located in volume 24 of the official reports of the Supreme Ct. of California (3rd series) at page 890.                 There the court grappled with an award...
Why was the landmark Supreme Court case Lawrence v. Texas so important? Add in text citation...
Why was the landmark Supreme Court case Lawrence v. Texas so important? Add in text citation and reference
Discuss the Arizona Supreme Court case of Simat Corp v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System.
Discuss the Arizona Supreme Court case of Simat Corp v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System.
In Kelo v. New London, a divided Supreme Court allowed the city of New London to...
In Kelo v. New London, a divided Supreme Court allowed the city of New London to seize a homeowner’s property by eminent domain. A private developer had been buying up derelict waterfront property for a very extensive redevelopment project that would bring hundreds of needed jobs to New London’s depressed economy. The project could not be built without the homeowner’s land and she refused to sell to the developer. New London seized her property by eminent domain then sold the...