Question

PC Connection and CDW are two online retailers that compete in an Internet market for digital...

PC Connection and CDW are two online retailers that compete in an Internet market for digital cameras. While the products they sell are similar, the firms attempt to differentiate themselves through their service policies. Over the last couple of months, PC Connection has matched CDW’s price cuts,but has not matched its price increases. Suppose that when PC Connection matches CDW’s price changes, the inverse demand curve for CDW’s cameras is given by P=1,225-2Q. When it does not match price changes, CDW’s inverse demand curve is P=775-0.5Q. Based on this information, determine CDW’s inverse demand function over the last couple of months.

P=( )-( ) Q if <300

( )-( ) Q if <300

Over what range will changes in marginal cost have on effect on CDW’s profit-maximizing level of output?

$( ) to $( )

Homework Answers

Answer #1

For quantity less than 300, the demand curve should be elastic (implying that the maximum price should be relatively lower). Hence demand is P = 775 - 0.5Q

For quantity greater than 300, the demand curve should be inelastic (implying that the maximum price should be relatively higher). Hence demand is P = 1225 - 2Q

Hence,

P = (775) - (0.5) Q if <300

= (1225) - (2) Q if > 300

Find the range for marginal cost using marginal revenue

MR1(Q = 300) = 775 - 300 = $475

MR2(Q = 300) = 1225 - 4*300 = $25

Hence the range is $25 to $475

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
PC Connection and CDW are two online retailers that compete in an Internet market for digital...
PC Connection and CDW are two online retailers that compete in an Internet market for digital cameras. While the products they sell are similar, the firms attempt to differentiate themselves through their service policies. Over the last couple of months, PC Connection has matched CDW’s price cuts, but has not matched its price increases. Suppose that when PC Connection matches CDW’s price changes, the inverse demand curve for CDW’s cameras is given by P = 1,400 - 2Q. When it...
PC Connection and CDW are two online retailers that compete in an Internet market for digital...
PC Connection and CDW are two online retailers that compete in an Internet market for digital cameras. While the products they sell are similar, the firms attempt to differentiate themselves through their service policies. Over the last couple of months, PC Connection has matched CDW’s price cuts, but has not matched its price increases. Suppose that when PC Connection matches CDW’s price changes, the inverse demand curve for CDW’s cameras is given by P = 1,600 - 3Q.When it does...
Two firms, a and b, compete in a market to sell homogeneous products with inverse demand...
Two firms, a and b, compete in a market to sell homogeneous products with inverse demand function P = 400 – 2Q where Q = Qa + Qb. Firm a has the cost function Ca = 100 + 15Qa and firm b has the cost function Cb = 100 + 15Qb. Use this information to compare the output levels, price and profits in settings characterized by the following markets: Cournot Stackelberg Bertrand Collusion
Two firms, a and b, compete in a market to sell homogeneous products with inverse demand...
Two firms, a and b, compete in a market to sell homogeneous products with inverse demand function P = 400 – 2Q where Q = Qa + Qb. Firm a has the cost function Ca = 100 + 15Qa and firm b has the cost function Cb = 100 + 15Qb. Use this information to compare the output levels, price, and profits in settings characterized by the following markets: a, Cournot b, Stackelberg c, Bertrand d, Collusion
Two firms compete in a homogeneous product market where the inverse demand function is P =...
Two firms compete in a homogeneous product market where the inverse demand function is P = 10 -2Q (quantity is measured in millions). Firm 1 has been in business for one year, while Firm 2 just recently entered the market. Each firm has a legal obligation to pay one year’s rent of $0.7 million regardless of its production decision. Firm 1’s marginal cost is $2, and Firm 2’s marginal cost is $6. The current market price is $8 and was...
Two firms compete in a homogeneous product market where the inverse demand function is P =...
Two firms compete in a homogeneous product market where the inverse demand function is P = 10 -2Q(quantity is measured in millions). Firm 1 has been in business for one year, while Firm 2 just recently entered the market. Each firm has a legal obligation to pay one year’s rent of $0.7 million regardless of its production decision. Firm 1’s marginal cost is $2, and Firm 2’s marginal cost is $6. The current market price is $8 and was set...
Two firms compete in a homogeneous product market where the inverse demand function is P =...
Two firms compete in a homogeneous product market where the inverse demand function is P = 10 -2Q(quantity is measured in millions). Firm 1 has been in business for one year, while Firm 2 just recently entered the market. Each firm has a legal obligation to pay one year’s rent of $0.7 million regardless of its production decision. Firm 1’s marginal cost is $2, and Firm 2’s marginal cost is $6. The current market price is $8 and was set...
1. Assume that Bradley Corporation Inc. produces advanced analytic software for computer simulations called Market-It. Based...
1. Assume that Bradley Corporation Inc. produces advanced analytic software for computer simulations called Market-It. Based on an analysis of product sales over a two-year period, Bradley’s marketing department estimates the demand for Market-It to be QM = 1,200 − 8PM + 4PS, where QM denotes units sold of Market-It software, PM denotes Market-It’s price, and PS denotes the price of a (competing) best-selling statistical software package (with both prices in dollars). a) Currently, PM = $200 and PS =...
In February 2012, the Pepsi Next product was launched into the US market. This case study...
In February 2012, the Pepsi Next product was launched into the US market. This case study provides students with an interesting insight into PepsiCo’s new product process and some of the challenging decisions that they faced along the way. Pepsi Next Case Study Introduction Pepsi Next was launched by PepsiCo into the US market in February 2012, and has since been rolled out to various international markets (for instance, it was launched in Australia in September 2012). The new product...