Question

In a defamation case, if the plaintiff is a public figure, then the plaintiff must prove...

In a defamation case, if the plaintiff is a public figure, then the plaintiff must prove which of the following?
A. Plaintiff must prove that the defendant's conduct was extreme and outrageous.
B. The standard elements of defamation and negligence.
C. There is a very lenient standard for public figures. The plaintiff only must prove the statement was defamatory and that it was false.
D. The standard elements of defamation and actual malice.

Business   Economics   
0 0
Add a commentTranscribed image text
Next >

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Option D is correct.

Given that the plaintiff is a public figure. the same has to prove that the defamation is done with an intention of defaming and the statement with a malice. Under such a case, there is an attempt to have a legal claim that involves a deliberate intention to cause injury to the reputation of a person which is therefore caused by a false statement of fact. Hence, the plaintiff will be required to prove that the defendant has acted with actual malice if the plaintiff is a public figure.

0 0
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Log In

Sign Up

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
If a plaintiff in an action for defamation is a public figure/official, what, in addition to...
If a plaintiff in an action for defamation is a public figure/official, what, in addition to showing the defendant made a false statement about the plaintiff that damaged them, must the plaintiff show? a-Intentional Conduct b-Negligence in making the statement c-that people knew the statement was concerning the plaintiff d-the statement was made with knowing falsity and/or reckless disregard for the truth only one confect answer
True or false I. Truth and privilege are defenses to defamation and if these defenses are...
True or false I. Truth and privilege are defenses to defamation and if these defenses are proved by the defendant, then the defendant cannot be held responsible for defamation. 2. Mitigation of damages in an obligation in tort law that plaintiffs have to lessen or reduce their potential injuries/damages through prompt medical treatment or other actions a reasonable person would have performed under similar circumstances or injuries. 3. In a false imprisonment situation, the law states that if there is...
The differences & similarities between the federal & state court systems. 2. The structure of the...
The differences & similarities between the federal & state court systems. 2. The structure of the Washington state court system; i.e. the trial court of general jurisdiction, the intermediate appellate court, the state supreme court. 3. Remember, Washington is in the 9 th Circuit Court of Appeals. 4. Under both the Washington state and federal court system, there is one appeal as of right. Appeals to the Washington Supreme Court(in the state system), or to the U.S. Supreme Court in...
1.Which of the following is the amount the borrower must pay back to the bondholders at...
1.Which of the following is the amount the borrower must pay back to the bondholders at maturity? A. present value B. principal amount C. stated interest value D. market value 2. Which of the following is a true statement regarding the effect of a stock split and stock dividend on total assets or liabilities? A. Both a stock split and a stock dividend will increase total liabilities. B. A stock split will increase total assets, but a stock dividend will...
Liebeck v. McDonalds Restaurants: The Original Coffee Product Liability Case James M. Dedman, IV Back in...
Liebeck v. McDonalds Restaurants: The Original Coffee Product Liability Case James M. Dedman, IV Back in 1994, Stella Liebeck v. McDonalds Restaurants became one of the most talked about lawsuits in American history. To this day, that New Mexico state court case is an essential component of any tort reform debate or discussion of litigation lore. At that time, and to this day, the thought of a fast food drive-thru customer spilling coffee on herself in her vehicle and later...
Janet Broom and Darla Miller were employed as certified medication aide and cook, respectively, at the...
Janet Broom and Darla Miller were employed as certified medication aide and cook, respectively, at the employer's residential care facility located in Norman, Oklahoma. Both employees suspected another employee of stealing and using drugs, intended for use by residents of the faculty, from the facility’s medication room. Broom and Miller decided to report the suspected employee based on their observation that she had falsified medical drug log books to conceal her theft from facility managers. The facility’s Employee Handbook clearly...
The case WorldCom On 9 June 2003, the US Bankruptcy Court of New York issued an...
The case WorldCom On 9 June 2003, the US Bankruptcy Court of New York issued an interim report (Thornburgh, 2003) which expanded on the Court’s earlier find- ings (Thornburgh, 2002) of lack of corporate gov- ernance, mismanagement and concern regarding the integrity of WorldCom’s accounting and fi- nancial reporting functions. Amongst the numer- ous incidents of mismanagement, corporate gov- ernance failure and accounting irregularities, the most salient related to the overstatement of re- ported profitability by inappropriately capitaliz- ing very...
QUESTION 1 Which one of the following would NOT be necessary for an offer to have...
QUESTION 1 Which one of the following would NOT be necessary for an offer to have legal standing? A. The language must reflect the intent to become a party to a contract. B. All of the conditions under which the offer would be terminated must be identified. C. All the significant terms and/or conditions must be contained in the offer. D. The offer must be effectively communicated to the other party. 3 points    QUESTION 2 Which one of the...
1. Evidence that relates to, or bears directly upon, the point or fact in issue, and...
1. Evidence that relates to, or bears directly upon, the point or fact in issue, and proves or has a tendency to prove the proposition alleged, is relevant evidence. T OR F? 2. Evidence is legally material and admissible if it relates to a fact in issue and has only a slight bearing on the matter in issue. T OR F? 3. Photographic evidence of a gruesome crime scene may be admitted if it is probative of a fact in...
READ THE CASE STUDY AND ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS 2nd CASE: An Unexplained Death A 65-year-old...
READ THE CASE STUDY AND ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS 2nd CASE: An Unexplained Death A 65-year-old man of Scandinavian descent was rushed to the Emergency Room of your local hospital after a family member discovered him unconscious in his home. The woman who dialed “911” told the dispatcher that the man, her brother, was the local librarian of the past 10 years and had no spouse or children. She reported that they had spoken the day before, and he had...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT