Question

Is a recessionary or inflationary gap bad for an economy? Have you ever wondered how the federal government and the Federal Reserve react to smooth out recessionary and inflationary gaps? In this activity, you will explore the concepts of fiscal policy and the attempts the U.S. government takes when the U.S. economy is in a recessionary or inflation gap. You will discuss the concepts of aggregate supply and aggregate demand to determine how the U.S. economy can work its way back to long-run equilibrium based.

Locate a recent article (published within the last year) that discusses fiscal policy and whether the U.S. economy is in an inflationary or recessionary gap. You can use the Hunt Library, newspapers, new stations, or other credible sources to locate an article. Analyze the article and then address the following concepts in your discussion.

• Interpret recessionary and expansionary gaps within the economy.
• Explain the inter-workings of fiscal policy tools.
• State how taxation and government spending works.
• Differentiate between fiscal and monetary policy.
• Demonstrate the mechanics of discretionary fiscal policy within the Keynesian framework.

Summarize your findings using at least 250 words and provide a minimum of one reference. Use current APA formatting to document your sources.

Answer 1

ANSWER :

Recessionary or inflationary gaps are neither bad nor good for economic growth but needs immediate fiscal and monetary policy intervention. When economy enters into recessionary gap occurs when actual GDP is lower than full employment GDP and such situations is visible in UsA due to US China Trade War and global uncertainty. Here Us economy has attempted to lower corporate taxes, rolledout higher discretionary government spending and lowered interest rates and looks forward to buyback government securities using expansionary fiscal policy and expansionary monetary policy. This boosts liquidity in market and boosts aggregate demand as consumption revives and thus real GDP grows.

The biggest issue been surfaced is US China Trade War, Immigration Laws, US National Debt, Foreign Relations policy

US and china have great history of trade wars however recent times has been largely due to sanctions been imposed on china by USA.

Recently, USA slpped tarrifs on 40% of chinese goods. which has caused prices of US goods to go up substantially becuase cheap imports fro china have been stopped.USA has also stopped cheap imports of steel and as a result Chinese government too has imposed substantial tarrifs on USA goods.

As a result, there has been currency devaluation in China to make it goods look more cheaper and attractive and has started selling Goods in emerging markets. US goods however have become more costlier and hence sales have decreased.

Chinese government has aggravated trade war by imposing fresh round of tarrifs , however before G20 summit which will be held in 2018, such issues will be resolved.

Since, China has imposed tarrifs we see there has been lack of entry of chinese workrs and visas in USA which has nullified the clear cut winner. Because of trade war, India has managed to export steel and aluminium to US markets and hence has been the greatest beneficiary.

Given the Presidential Power following economic strategies need best case implementation :

Resolution of NAFTA deal with negotiation as well as maintenance of great relationships with South Korea on denuclearization by maintaining an eye on all developments
US China pact and removal of tarriffsby signing of MOU and economic cooperation
Immigration laws been relaxed by allowing H1B for Indians who look to create startups IN UsA and generate more employment
Debt refinancing and additional taxation on corporates with large market Capitalization to decrease debt in short term.
Increasing interest rates to appreciate dollar and control inflation and money supply in market

References:

Bailey, Martin Neil, What Happened to The Great American Job Machine!? The impact of trade and electronic Offshoring.

Cline, William R 2004. Trade policy and Global Poverty. Washington : Institute for International economics

Goldman Sachs, 2003. Dreaming with BRICS: the path to 2050. Goldman Sachs Global Economics paper 99

Zoelick, Robert B 2001. American Trade Leadership : What is at Stake? Speech before Institute of International Economics washing mton, September 24.

Schott, Jeffrey, 2004. Free trade agreements :US strategy and Priorities. Washington: Institute for International economics

NOTE : IF YOU HAVE ANY DOUTS PLZZ COMMENT AND PLZZ RATE MY ANSWER TO MY SCORE