Question

Suppose the marginal cost of abatement for a airborne pollutant is MC= 4X, where X is...

Suppose the marginal cost of abatement for a airborne pollutant is MC= 4X, where X is measured in tons, and the marginal benefit of abatement is 500 - X. The maximum abatement (reducing pollution to zero) is XMAX= 500.

a) Graph the MC and MB curves and show the efficienct level of abatement X* on the graph.

b) Calculate the efficient level of abatement X*

c) Suppose there is no abatement (X=0, which implies no actions are made to remove pollution and we all deal with it) Calculate the deadweight loss.

D) If the government restricted the total amount of pollution to 350 tons (so abatement would be 150), would that be efficient? If not, is it too much pollution or too little? Calculate the total waste in dollars relative to the efficient level.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

a)

X MC MB
0 0 500
10 40 490
20 80 480
30 120 470
40 160 460
50 200 450
60 240 440
70 280 430
80 320 420
90 360 410
100 400 400
110 440 390
120 480 380
130 520 370
140 560 360
150 600 350
160 640 340

b. The efficient level ox X is where MC=MR=400 and X =100

c. Deadweight loss = 0.5*(500-400)*100 = 5000

d. With the restriction of pollution to 350 tons, is an inefficient level which would lead to increased cost of 600, so the total waste in dollars which is an extra increased cost would be 250.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
(c) The aggregate marginal cost function for this two-firm industry is: MC = 3Q Suppose the...
(c) The aggregate marginal cost function for this two-firm industry is: MC = 3Q Suppose the marginal benefit of pollution control is given by: MB = 35 − 0.5Q What is the efficient level of abatement? (d) What is the relationship between cost-effectiveness and efficiency? (e) What pollution tax would yield the efficient level of abatement you found in part (c)? If the pollution charge is levied on all units of emissions, how much revenue would the government receive? (f)...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of reducing pollution for each firm is as follows: MC1= 3e1and MC2= 45e2, where e1and e2are the amounts (in tons) of emissions reduced by the first and second firms, respectively. Assume that in the absence of government intervention, Firm 1 generates 500 units of emissions and Firm 2 generates 500 units of emissions. Suppose Shreveport regulators decide to reduce total pollution by 400 units. If...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of reducing pollution for each firm is as follows: MC1 = 3e1 and MC2 = 45e2, where e1 and e2 are the amounts (in tons) of emissions reduced by the first and second firms, respectively. Assume that in the absence of government intervention, Firm 1 generates 500 units of emissions and Firm 2 generates 500 units of emissions. Suppose Shreveport regulators decide to reduce total...
Two polluting firms can control emissions of a pollutant by incurring the following marginal abatement costs:...
Two polluting firms can control emissions of a pollutant by incurring the following marginal abatement costs: MAC1 = $300?1, and MAC2 = $100?2 where ?1, and ?2 are the amount of emissions abated (i.e., pollution controlled) by firm 1 and firm 2 respectively. Assume that with no abatement of emissions at all, firm 1 would release 15 units of pollution and firm 2 would release 10 units, for a total of 25 units. Assume the target level of abatement is...
Consider two polluting firms. The marginal cost of abatement for firm 1 is MC1 = e1...
Consider two polluting firms. The marginal cost of abatement for firm 1 is MC1 = e1 + 300, and the marginal cost of abatement for firm 2 is MC2 = 3e2, where e1 and e2 are the tons of pollution abatement by firms 1 and 2, respectively. Baseline pollution levels are bl1 = 2000 and bl2 = 2000. Suppose the government sets a pollution reduction goal of 1600 total units of abatement. Write down two equations that ensure that the...
Consider a "market for pollution'' where the marginal abatement cost is given by ???(?)=300−2?MAC(e)=300−2e and the...
Consider a "market for pollution'' where the marginal abatement cost is given by ???(?)=300−2?MAC(e)=300−2e and the marginal social cost of emissions is constant at $20$20 per tonnes of emissions. ?e is measured in tons of emissions. a) (4) What would be the unregulated market amount of emissions? b) (4) What is the socially efficient amount of emissions? c) (3) Compute the deadweight loss from the unregulated emissions externality. d) (4) Give two policies, implied by this model, that can generate...
Suppose that there are two firms (1 and 2) with marginal abatement cost (MAC) curves as...
Suppose that there are two firms (1 and 2) with marginal abatement cost (MAC) curves as follows: MAC1 = 160 − 4E1 MAC2 = 100 − E2 (E1 and E2 represent the respective amounts of emissions in litres.) a-)What are the marginal abatement cost curves of these two firms as a function of their abatement? b-)What would the industry-wide emissions be after 40 litres of abatement? c-)Calculate the industry total cost of abatement if each firm abates 20 litres. d-)Derive...
4. Consider an industry with three firms. Firm 1’s marginal cost of abatement (MCA)=20-2E1, where E...
4. Consider an industry with three firms. Firm 1’s marginal cost of abatement (MCA)=20-2E1, where E is the tons of pollution emitted. Firm 2’s MCA=10-E2. Firm 3’s MCA=40-2E3. Please draw a diagram to support your answers to the following questions. If there is no policy to reduce pollution, how much pollution will be emitted by each firm? What will be total pollution? If the government imposes a tax of $10/ton, how much pollution will be emitted by each firm? What...
Suppose that the Marginal Abatement Cost function and the Marginal Damage function for an industry are...
Suppose that the Marginal Abatement Cost function and the Marginal Damage function for an industry are given as follows: MAC = 48 – 0.4e MD = 0.35e For simplicity here, we are assuming that they are linear. a. Graph the MAC and MD curves for this industry. Make sure you are marking out any and all relevant axis intercepts. b. Suppose that the government want to impose a standard limiting the emissions to the efficient level. i. At what value...
Suppose a control authority is trying to design a cost-effective pollution control policy. They assume the...
Suppose a control authority is trying to design a cost-effective pollution control policy. They assume the aggregate marginal abatement cost is given as MAC = 16 –q and the marginal pollution damage is given as MD = 3q where q is the total amount of emissions. Calculate the socially efficient level of emissions. Use a diagram to explain why the profit-maximising level of emissions and socially efficient level of emissions are different. Suppose the control authority tries to achieve the...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT