Question

Consider a first-price sealed-bid auction. Suppose bidders' valuations are v1=10 and v2=10. Suppose bidder 2 submits...

Consider a first-price sealed-bid auction. Suppose bidders' valuations are v1=10 and v2=10. Suppose bidder 2 submits a bid b2=10. Then, in a Nash equilibrium in pure strategies bidder 1 must be submitting a bid equal to ______. In this Nash equilibrium, bidder 1's payoff is equal to ______.

Please explain!!

Homework Answers

Answer #1

In a pure stratergy the first bidder value is 10 and second biddr value is 20

V1 = 10

V2 = 20

Bid value of 2nd bidder = 10

According to pure stratergies assume thefirst bidder bid value as i.

if the values of first bidder

B2 i > V1 than the first bidder will loose and pay off is zero

i > b2 > V1 first bidder wins the auction and the pay off is negative and he should avoid bidding

So according tgo this responses the first bidder value B1 = 10 and the payoff is zero as the responses are equally distributted with same probability between 1 and 2

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Consider a first-price sealed-bid auction as the one analyzed in class. Suppose bidders' valuations are v1=10...
Consider a first-price sealed-bid auction as the one analyzed in class. Suppose bidders' valuations are v1=10 and v2=10. Suppose bidder 2 submits a bid b2=10. Then, in a Nash equilibrium in pure strategies bidder 1 must be submitting a bid equal to __ . In this Nash equilibrium, bidder 1's payoff is equal to __ (please, enter numerical values only, for example: 4).
Find a Nash Equilibrium of the second price sealed bid auction that is different from [v1,...
Find a Nash Equilibrium of the second price sealed bid auction that is different from [v1, v2, 0, ....0]
Consider 45 risk-neutral bidders who are participating in a second-price, sealed-bid auction. It is commonly known...
Consider 45 risk-neutral bidders who are participating in a second-price, sealed-bid auction. It is commonly known that bidders have independent private values. Based on this information, we know the optimal bidding strategy for each bidder is to: A. bid their own valuation of the item. B. shade their bid to just below their own valuation. C. bid according to the following bid function: b = v − (v − L)/n. D. bid one penny above their own valuation to ensure...
. In the 2nd-Price Sealed-Bid auction, the highest bidder wins, but pays a price equal to...
. In the 2nd-Price Sealed-Bid auction, the highest bidder wins, but pays a price equal to the second-highest bid. So why wouldn’t a player simply submit an absurdly large bid, thus increasing the likelihood of winning - after all, she doesn’t pay this bid. In other words, consider a player whose true valuation is 10, but who bids 100.
Suppose that we have the following auction scheme. There are two bidders, and an item to...
Suppose that we have the following auction scheme. There are two bidders, and an item to be allocated to them. Each bidder submits a bid. The highest bidder gets the good, but both bidders pay their bids. Consider the case in which bidder 1 values the item at 3, while bidder 2 values the item at 5; this is commonly known. Each bidder can only submit one of three bids: 0, 1 or 2. If player i bids more than...
1. Which is statement is true? I. A single-price monopolist charges a price equal to the...
1. Which is statement is true? I. A single-price monopolist charges a price equal to the marginal cost of the last unit sold. II. A monopolist with positive marginal costs and facing a linear demand curve always sets a quantity (or price) such that it sells on the elastic section of the demand curve. III. A monopolist regulated by marginal-cost pricing regulation sells at a price that covers its variable and fixed costs of production, but it still causes a...