Question

Suppose that two power plants each releases 200 units of toxic air into the atmosphere per...

Suppose that two power plants each releases 200 units of toxic air into the atmosphere per year. Both firms are ordered by the federal government to reduce their pollution levels. Let Q denote the amount of pollution reduction. Firm A’s marginal costs associated with pollution reduction are M C = 2Q − 20. Firm B’s marginal costs associated with pollution reduction are MC = 3Q. The marginal benefit of pollution reduction is MB = 240. (a) What is the socially optimal level of each firm’s pollution reduction? Show your cal- culation. (b) Taking the sum of the two firm’s optimal level of pollution calculated in (a) as the target of total reduction, is the policy of splitting this target amount equally between the two firms socially optimal? Why? (c) How would a “cap and trade” scheme work? In particular, (i) How many pollution permits should be issued to the two firms in total? (ii) Assuming equal amount of initial pollution permits for each firm, who buys how much permits from whom? How much pollution reduction each firm would achieve? (iii) Is the final outcome after trade efficient? Explain.

Homework Answers

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Two firms are ordered by the federal government to reduce their pollution levels. Firm A’s marginal...
Two firms are ordered by the federal government to reduce their pollution levels. Firm A’s marginal costs associated with pollution reduction are MCA = 20+4QA. Firm B’s marginal costs associated with pollution reduction are M CB = 10 + 8QB . The marginal benefit of pollution reduction is M B = 400 − 4(QA + QB ). (a) What is the socially optimal level of each firm’s pollution reduction? (b) Compare the social efficiency of three possible outcomes: (1) require...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of reducing pollution for each firm is as follows: MC1= 3e1and MC2= 45e2, where e1and e2are the amounts (in tons) of emissions reduced by the first and second firms, respectively. Assume that in the absence of government intervention, Firm 1 generates 500 units of emissions and Firm 2 generates 500 units of emissions. Suppose Shreveport regulators decide to reduce total pollution by 400 units. If...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of reducing pollution for each firm is as follows: MC1 = 3e1 and MC2 = 45e2, where e1 and e2 are the amounts (in tons) of emissions reduced by the first and second firms, respectively. Assume that in the absence of government intervention, Firm 1 generates 500 units of emissions and Firm 2 generates 500 units of emissions. Suppose Shreveport regulators decide to reduce total...
tradable permits Two steel factories are currently emitting 8,000 tons of pollution each (for a total...
tradable permits Two steel factories are currently emitting 8,000 tons of pollution each (for a total of 16,000 tons). Pollution reduction (abatement) costs for Plant 1 are given by MCR1= 0.02Q and for Plant 2 by MCR2 = 0.03Q, where Q represents tons of abatement, and MCR the marginal cost of pollution reduction. A. Suppose a tradable permit system is instituted in which permits for emissions of 6,000 tons of pollution are freely issued, 3,000 permits to each plant. What...
Assume there are two polluting firms in two different cities. In the business-as-usual outcome, Firm #1...
Assume there are two polluting firms in two different cities. In the business-as-usual outcome, Firm #1 would emit 20 units of pollution (e1=20) and Firm #2 would emit 20 units of pollution (e2=20). Additionally, assume the marginal abatement costs for Firm #1 and Firm #2 are given below: MAC1 (x1) = 0.5x1    &    MAC2 (x2) = 2x2 This pollutant is known to cause adverse health effects when in high concentrations. Since the firms are in different cities, assume the marginal social benefit...
Two firms, A and B, currently pollute the air. Each firm currently emits 6 units in...
Two firms, A and B, currently pollute the air. Each firm currently emits 6 units in each period. A study shows that total economic surplus can be increased by reducing the total level of emissions by 6 units. The cost to each of the two firms of reducing their emissions is shown in the table below. Marginal Cost of Reducing Emissions ($/unit) Unit Reduced Firm A Firm B 1 10 18 2 15 28 3 20 45 4 25 57...
Part II. Kang Corporation operates a factory that produces labor economic textbooks. The factory is located...
Part II. Kang Corporation operates a factory that produces labor economic textbooks. The factory is located next to a river. Mr. Roh, a fisherman in the downstream area of the river, experiences damages to his fishery business due to pollution caused by the factory. Assignment 2 Public Finance S. Go Q denotes the quantity of the labor economics textbooks produced a year. The supply curve, or the private marginal costs, of the Kang Corporation is P = 3Q + 2....
Two polluting firms emit 200 tons of SO2 each, with Marginal Abatement Costs given by MAC1=...
Two polluting firms emit 200 tons of SO2 each, with Marginal Abatement Costs given by MAC1= 2X1 and MAC2= 3X2, respectively. Xi represents the level of abatement for each firm i, in tons. The government wants to reduce total SO2 emissions by 30% and decides to impose a uniform cap on emissions, with each firm receiving 140 allowances for free (firms don’t pay for allowance). What is the market price of SO2 abatement? How many permits are traded between firms,...
(c) The aggregate marginal cost function for this two-firm industry is: MC = 3Q Suppose the...
(c) The aggregate marginal cost function for this two-firm industry is: MC = 3Q Suppose the marginal benefit of pollution control is given by: MB = 35 − 0.5Q What is the efficient level of abatement? (d) What is the relationship between cost-effectiveness and efficiency? (e) What pollution tax would yield the efficient level of abatement you found in part (c)? If the pollution charge is levied on all units of emissions, how much revenue would the government receive? (f)...
Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each...
Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods: Available Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government sets pollution standards using regulation. 2. The government allocates tradable pollution permits. Each firm faces different costs,...