Kate and Antonio meet in their school cafeteria and examine the
contents of their lunch boxes. Kate discovers a bag of M&Ms
while Antonio finds a package of Starburst. Suppose a market place
for candy has emerged in the school lunch room. The price of a
Starburst is 16 cents, p1 = 16, and the price of an M&M is 4
cent, p2 = 4. Antonio has 12 Starbursts and zero M&M’s. Kate
has zero Starbursts and 200 M&Ms. Suppose Antonio’s and Kate’s
preferences are characterized by marginal rate of substitution
functions,
MRSAntonio(x1,x2) = (12)/(√(3(x1))
MRSKate (x1,x2)= (2√(2(x2))/(5)
1. Verify that MRS representation of preferences for Antonio and
Kate are consistent with the utility function
representations,
uA(x1,x2) = 16√(3(x1)) + 2(x2)
uK(x1,x2) = 2(x1) + 5√(2(x2))
where uA(x) is Antonio’s utility function and uK(x) is Kate’s
utility function. (Hint: Use the formula, MRS = MU1/MU2.)
2. Use the formula for optimal demand, MRS (x∗) = p1/p2 together
with the equation for the budget line to determine Antonio’s
optimal consumption choice. Denote it x∗A.
3. Use the formula for optimal demand, MRS (x∗) = p1/p2 together
with the equation for the budget line to determine Kate’s optimal
consumption choice. Denote it x∗K.
4. Draw Antonio’s budget constraint the same way as in Problem 3.
Illustrate the optimal consumption choice x∗A and the initial
allocation eA. Draw the indifference curves that run through each
of the two points. Use this to argue how the market has allowed
Antonio to improve his welfare relative to his initial
allocation.
5. Repeat question 4, but for Kate.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.